New Ischemic Cerebral Lesions After Endarterectomy vs. Stenting for the Treatment of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT03764306

Last Updated: 2018-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-01

Study Completion Date

2018-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background and purpose. Even if periprocedural cerebral microembolism associated with carotid endarterectomy or stenting usually does not manifest as clinically overt stroke, neuropsychological disturbances resulting from these events represent an important clinical and socioeconomic problem. Still, it remains unclear whether the use proximal protection can lower the incidence of cerebral embolism associated with the treatment of carotid stenosis.

Materials and methods. This was a prospective randomised single-centre study, which was aimed at comparison of surgical eversion endarterectomy with stenting under proximal protection in symptomatic patients. The investigators evaluated the incidence of new ischaemic lesions revealed by the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging 2-4 days after the treatment and neurologic events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The CARECarotid was a prospective randomised single-centre study, which was performed in the University Hospital in Kraków. It was planned to evaluate 50 patients presenting with symptomatic lesions of the internal carotid artery.

Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms: surgical endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty with stenting under proximal protection. All patients provided their written informed consent to undergo the procedures and to participate in this trial.

In all surgical patients carotid endarterectomy will perform using the eversion technique. All surgical endarterectomies will perform under cervical block anaesthesia.

Perioperatively patients in the surgical arm received aspirin; other antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents were not administered during 5 days before surgery.

All procedures in carotid artery stenting will perform with proximal protection system - the Mo.Ma (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) device. The investigators will implante stents that were tailored to the localisation of lesions and morphology of carotid arteries: Carotid Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA, and in patients with tortuous arteries Precise Pro RX (Cordis, Fremont, CA, USA) or Roadsaver (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). Patients in the stent arm will receive clopidogrel 75 mg/day and aspirin 75 mg/day. These drugs were administered during 3 days before planned procedure and then 3-6 months after stent implantation. All patients will have MRI DWI performed before and 2-4 days after procedures in both groups. Within 6 months there will be an evaluation of the incidence of neurological events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carotid Artery Stenosis Carotid Atherosclerosis Stroke, Ischemic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms: surgical endarterectomy or carotid angioplasty with stenting under proximal protection
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Carotid Artery Stenting

Subjects will undergo carotid artery angioplasty and stenting with any CE-certificated carotid stent with a proximal protection system Mo.Ma

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carotid Artery Stenting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Carotid artery stenting was considered successful if there was no residual stenosis greater than 20%, and there was no dissection of target artery following the procedure.

Endarterectomy carotid artery

Subjects will undergo carotid endarterectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endarterectomy carotid artery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical endarterectomy was considered successful if there was no residual stenosis after procedure, without symptoms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid artery stenting was considered successful if there was no residual stenosis greater than 20%, and there was no dissection of target artery following the procedure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endarterectomy carotid artery

Surgical endarterectomy was considered successful if there was no residual stenosis after procedure, without symptoms.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient's age ≥ 18 years;
* 60-99% stenosis of the internal carotid artery (degree of stenosis assessed by means of Doppler sonography, CT angiography or catheter angiography);
* diameter of the target internal carotid artery not more than 7 mm;
* symptomatic lesion (a history of ipsilateral stroke, transient ischaemic attack or reversible ischaemic neurological deficit);
* localisation and morphology of the lesion making possible surgical eversion endarterectomy or endovascular angioplasty with stent implantation;
* written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* target lesion that has been previously stented;
* highly calcified lesions;
* very tortuous common and internal carotid arteries;
* occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery without adequate collateral circulation through the circle of Willis (revealed by means of transcranial Doppler sonography);
* anatomical contraindications for eversion endarterectomy;
* acute ipsilateral stroke;
* disabling stroke at any side;
* other severe pathologies of the brain resulting is significant loss of cerebral tissue and/or significant neurological deficits, such as extensive previous stroke or multiple lacunar infarcts;
* history of haemorrhagic transformation of ischaemic stroke;
* severe comorbidities (such as cancer or decompensated heart failure);
* allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine;
* allergy to iodinated contrast media;
* pregnant women;
* women of reproductive age who do not use effective contraception;
* metallic implants (such as peacemakers and orthopaedic endoprostheses) or other known contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jagiellonian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pawel Latacz

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pawel Latacz, PhD MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jagiellonian University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cremonesi A, Gieowarsingh S, Spagnolo B, Manetti R, Liso A, Furgieri A, Barattoni MC, Ghetti L, Tavazzi L, Castriota F. Safety, efficacy and long-term durability of endovascular therapy for carotid artery disease: the tailored-Carotid Artery Stenting Experience of a single high-volume centre (tailored-CASE Registry). EuroIntervention. 2009 Nov;5(5):589-98. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i5a95.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20142180 (View on PubMed)

Ansel GM, Hopkins LN, Jaff MR, Rubino P, Bacharach JM, Scheinert D, Myla S, Das T, Cremonesi A; Investigators for the ARMOUR Pivotal Trial. Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jul 1;76(1):1-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22439.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20222019 (View on PubMed)

Bersin RM, Stabile E, Ansel GM, Clair DG, Cremonesi A, Hopkins LN, Nikas D, Reimers B, Sievert H, Rubino P. A meta-analysis of proximal occlusion device outcomes in carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec 1;80(7):1072-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24433. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22454248 (View on PubMed)

Gao MY, Sillesen HH, Lorentzen JE, Schroeder TV. Eversion carotid endarterectomy generates fewer microemboli than standard carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2000 Aug;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.1072.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10942686 (View on PubMed)

Silver FL, Mackey A, Clark WM, Brooks W, Timaran CH, Chiu D, Goldstein LB, Meschia JF, Ferguson RD, Moore WS, Howard G, Brott TG; CREST Investigators. Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST). Stroke. 2011 Mar;42(3):675-80. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610212. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21307169 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

137/KBL/OIL/2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.