EndovaSCular TreAtment to imProve outcomEs for Medium Vessel Occlusions (ESCAPE-MeVO Trial)

NCT ID: NCT05151172

Last Updated: 2024-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

530 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-15

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke occurs when a blood clot causes a blockage in a blood vessel (artery) within the brain. This type of stroke is called an ischemic stroke and carries a high risk of disability or death. Stroke must be treated very fast. Any delay of even 10 minutes can result in the difference between an independent and a disabled outcome, and in some cases between life and death. Endovascular therapy (EVT) or Thrombectomy is a procedure to remove the blood clot (thrombus) from a blood vessel to reopen it (recanalization). Patients are likely to benefit from a thrombectomy procedure when it is performed in a larger blood vessel. Currently it is not known if thrombectomy procedure will benefit the patients presenting with the stroke that has been caused by a blood clot in a medium sized blood vessel (medium vessel occlusion, MeVO). This trial will enrol patients diagnosed with acute stroke due to a clot in the medium sized vessel. The patients will be randomized within 12 hours of their symptom onset to either standard of care or standard of care plus thrombectomy procedure. The participation will last for 12 months Escape MeVO coordinating centre is located at the University of Calgary. There will be up to 75 sites. We will be recruiting a total of 530 patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

ESCAPE-MeVO is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open- label study with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE design). Participants will be randomized to routine best medical stroke care governed by current guidelines (control group) or to EVT plus best medical care. EVT will be performed with one of the Solitaire group of intracranial stent-retriever devices (Solitaire X, Medtronic) as the first line approach according to the manufacturers' specifications for use.

Patients with clinical symptoms of acute stroke, last seen normal within the last 12 hours, and with either NIHSS ≥ 5 or NIHSS 3-5 due to disabling symptoms in the judgement of the stroke team shall undergo imaging to identify the MeVO and assess the status of the affected brain parenchyma. As is being currently practiced across different stroke centers, imaging may follow different imaging paradigms:

* Option 1: NCCT + mCTA (first phase covers intracranial and extracranial vessels)
* Option 2: NCCT + mCTA/spCTA + either mCTA tissue level perfusion maps or CTP perfusion maps
* Option 3: DWI-MRI + MRA (of both the intracranial and extracranial vessels). Approach to the EVT procedure and technique will be at the discretion of the interventionist and team, with the exception that the first thrombectomy attempt is performed with one of the Solitaire group of intracranial stent-retriever devices (Solitaire X, Medtronic). Available, approved off-the-shelf, secondary devices may be used if reperfusion success is not achieved after use of the first device, at the discretion of the neuro-interventionalist

This study consists of one 90-day study period for each participant. Participants will be hospitalized for care after their acute stroke according to the current standard of care. Participants are required to return to clinic on Day 90 for end-of-study assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Ischemic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

ESCAPE-MeVO is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open- label study with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE design). Subjects will be allocated (1:1) to best guideline-based best medical care plus endovascular therapy (EVT) vs. best guideline- based best medical care alone.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

best medical care

All patients will receive the best standard of medical care according to modern acute stroke care guidelines All patients including the ones in control arm will receive the best standard of medical care according to modern acute stroke care guidelines. The model will be the Canadian best practices guidelines for acute stroke care. These are very similar to the guidelines of the American Stroke Association and the European Stroke Organization. All participants are expected to be admitted to hospital as part of routine standard of care.It is expected that all participants will undergo a routine work-up for the mechanism of their stroke and be treated appropriately and definitively.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Standarad medical care

Intervention Type OTHER

Stanadard medical care wil involve use of thrombolytic drugs, Blood pressure management, use of antiplatelet or anti coagulant drugs

endovascular thrombectomy

All participants will receive the best standard of medical care according to modern acute stroke care guidelines. In the intervention/experimental arm, participants will be treated with endovascular thrombectomy with a Solitaire device (Medtronic) as the first line approach. The trial mandates that the first attempt is performed with a Solitaire X device (3mm, 4mm or 6mm diameter devices; Medtronic). The remaining treatment technique is left to the discretion of the treating neurointerventionalist. Secondary devices may be used if success is not achieved after use of the first device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

minimally invasive endovascular surgery for mechanical removal of occluding intracranial thrombus

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)

minimally invasive endovascular surgery for mechanical removal of occluding intracranial thrombus

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standarad medical care

Stanadard medical care wil involve use of thrombolytic drugs, Blood pressure management, use of antiplatelet or anti coagulant drugs

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

solitaire X

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Acute ischemic stroke clinically eligible for immediate EVT
2. Age ≥18 years at the date of randomization
3. Time from onset (or last-seen-well) to randomization \<12 hours
4. Disabling stroke defined as follows:

1. baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score \>5 at the time of randomization
2. NIHSS 3-5 with disabling deficit (eg. hemianopia, aphasia, loss of hand function) as determined by the attending physician in context of the patient's life situation
5. Confirmed symptomatic and endovascularly treatable MeVO based on neurovascular non-invasive imaging (mCTA or MRA), at one or more of the following locations: M2 or M3 segment, A2 or A3 segment, P2 or P3 segment1.
6. . Clinical deficit commensurate with MeVO occlusion location
7. . Signed informed consent, two-physician consent, or deferral of consent where approved

Exclusion Criteria

8. ASPECTS ≤ 5
9. The following depend on the imaging modality of the participating site:

9a. NCCT + mCTA

* Well demarcated hypodensity in the majority of the brain parenchyma supplied by the occluded vessel or absence of collaterals in the affected territory on the delayed phases of the mCTA OR 9b. NCCT + (m)CTA + CTP\*\*
* Diffusion restriction in the majority of the brain parenchyma supplied by the occluded vessel
* if MR perfusion is performed: lack of core:penumbra mismatch 10) Any evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on qualifying imaging 11) Patients living in a nursing home or requiring daily nursing care or assistance with activities of daily living.

12\) Patient has a major co-morbid illness, such as severe dementia, advanced cancer, advanced heart failure etc. such that they are unlikely to be able to complete follow-up or they are unlikely to achieve the primary outcome due to the underlying illness (rather than the stroke or its treatment).

13\) Pregnancy: female with positive urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) test 14) Participation in another clinical therapeutic intervention trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Michael D Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Michael D Hill

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mayank Goyal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary and Foothills Medical Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baptist Health Medical Center

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Sutter Health

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Providence Little company of Mary

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Yale School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Baptist Health Medical Centre

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Medicine

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Rush university Medical Centre

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

bBston Medican Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Health System

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio Health (Columbus ORI)

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Toledo

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of TN Health Sciences Centre

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas stroke Institute

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Swedish Medical Centre

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Calgary - Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University of Alberta Hospital

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver general hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II HSC

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Health Sciences North

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St Michael's hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Neurological Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Royal University Hospital

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Klinikum Altenburger Lang

Altenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

Freiberg, , Germany

Site Status

University of Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Tübingen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital of Bonn

Venusberg, , Germany

Site Status

Wurzberg University Hospital

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Royal Stoke University Hospital

Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge University Hospital

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Hull University Teaching Hospital

Hull, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds Teaching Hospitals

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Royal London Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kings college Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St Georges Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Charing Cross Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Nottingham University Hospital

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

John Radcliffe Hopital

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Southhampton

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Germany United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goyal M, Ospel JM, Ganesh A, Dowlatshahi D, Volders D, Mohlenbruch MA, Jumaa MA, Nimjee SM, Booth TC, Buck BH, Kennedy J, Shankar JJ, Dorn F, Zhang L, Hametner C, Nardai S, Zafar A, Diprose W, Vatanpour S, Stebner A, Bosshart S, Singh N, Sebastian I, Uchida K, Ryckborst KJ, Fahed R, Hu SX, Vollherbst DF, Zaidi SF, Lee VH, Lynch J, Rempel JL, Teal R, Trivedi A, Bode FJ, Ogungbemi A, Pham M, Orosz P, Abdalkader M, Taschner C, Tarpley J, Poli S, Singh RJ, De Leacy R, Lopez G, Sahlas D, Chen M, Burns P, Schaafsma JD, Marigold R, Reich A, Amole A, Field TS, Swartz RH, Settecase F, Lenzser G, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Asdaghi N, Lobotesis K, Siddiqui AH, Berrouschot J, Mokin M, Ebersole K, Schneider H, Yoo AJ, Mandzia J, Klostranec J, Jadun C, Patankar T, Sauvageau E, Lenthall R, Peeling L, Huynh T, Budzik R, Lee SK, Makalanda L, Levitt MR, Perry RJ, Hlaing T, Jahromi BS, Singh P, Demchuk AM, Hill MD; ESCAPE-MeVO Investigators. Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Due to Medium-Vessel Occlusion. N Engl J Med. 2025 Apr 10;392(14):1385-1395. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2411668. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39908448 (View on PubMed)

Ospel JM, Dowlatshahi D, Demchuk A, Volders D, Mohlenbruch M, Nimjee S, Kennedy J, Buck B, Shankar JJ, Booth TC, Jumaa MA, Fahed R, Ganesh A, Zhang Q, Doram C, Ryckborst KJ, Hill MD, Goyal M; ESCAPE-MeVO investigators. Endovascular treatment to improve outcomes for medium vessel occlusions: The ESCAPE-MeVO trial. Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(9):1064-1070. doi: 10.1177/17474930241262642. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38845180 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Version E, November 15, 2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Minor Stroke Therapy Evaluation
NCT03796468 RECRUITING NA