Treatment of Persistent Distal Occlusion After Successful Proximal Recanalization in Thrombectomy

NCT ID: NCT06034847

Last Updated: 2024-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-30

Study Completion Date

2029-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In stroke patients, mechanical thrombectomy is now the standard of care when the stroke is due to large proximal cerebral vessel occlusion. The purpose of the 2BE3 trial is to test whether adjunct rescue treatment of persisting distal occlusions after successful proximal recanalization of the large vessel occlusion can be proposed as an additional intervention to restore reperfusion of affected stroke tissue and improve clinical outcomes.

The rescue therapies will be either mechanical (small stent retrievers and/or small aspiration catheters) or pharmacological (infusion of intra-arterial thrombolytics).

Patients will be randomized to conservative management (mechanical thrombectomy with or without IV thrombolytics of large proximal vessels) or rescue therapy (mechanical or pharmacological interventions in distal vessels in addition to conservative management). Each patient will be followed for 3 months post-intervention.

The data collected will be clinical assessments and angiographic imaging to evaluate the reperfusion state.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of the 2BE3 trial is to provide a clinical trial context for the use of rescue therapy (mechanical or pharmacological therapies) in patients with persistent distal occlusions after treatment of large vessel occlusions with mechanical thrombectomy and IV thrombolytics. The main hypothesis is that rescue therapy with mechanical or pharmacological therapies, compared with conservative management would result in improved clinical and reperfusion scores at 90 days.

The extent of reperfusion is an interesting therapeutic target because reperfusion status is a strong indicator of clinical outcome: grades of better reperfusion are incrementally associated with better clinical outcomes. Despite increased expertise of neuro-interventional teams and the evolution in thrombectomy devices, incomplete reperfusion occurs in almost half of patients undergoing treatment of large vessel occlusions. Thus, complementary treatments targeting distal occlusions and known as "rescue therapy" have been introduced to reach complete or near complete reperfusion.

The devices and techniques proposed as rescue therapies include small stent retrievers, small aspiration catheters and intra-arterial thrombolytics. Case studies and registries have shown high reperfusion rates and low rates of periprocedural complications; however, there is lack of randomized data to show the impact of rescue therapies on patient outcomes and safety compared to conservative management (treatment of large vessel occlusions only). A randomized clinical trial is therefore needed.

The 2BE3 trial is a simple randomized trial designed to be integrated into daily clinical practice. It will address whether rescue therapies truly offer a safe and more effective alternative to conservative management. Selection criteria are loose in order to be of use to most patients. Endpoints are simple, clinical, meaningful, valuable and resistant to bias. It includes no extra risk or cost of visits beyond what is required in routine care.

The design is multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study with blinded evaluation (PROBE design). The study population is acute ischemic stroke patients with persistent distal occlusions after treatment of large vessel occlusion with mechanical thrombectomy and/or intravenous thrombolysis. The total number of patients will be 300, 150 in each arm, each followed for 3 months post-intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke, Acute Thrombotic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conservative management

Mechanical thrombectomy of large vessel occlusions with or without administration of IV thrombolytics

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels

Intervention Type DEVICE

mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents to remove clots in proximal large vessels, combined or not with distal aspiration, combined or not with IV thrombolytics

Rescue therapy

In addition to conservative management, rescue therapy in distal occlusions consisting of either mechanical thrombectomy with small stent retrievers with or without contact aspiration, or intra-arterial pharmacotherapy with tPA (tissue Plasminogen Activator), uPA (urokinase Plasminogen Activator) or tenecteplase.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels

Intervention Type DEVICE

mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents to remove clots in proximal large vessels, combined or not with distal aspiration, combined or not with IV thrombolytics

Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels

Intervention Type DEVICE

In addition to mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels, mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels with small stent retrievers combined or not with contact aspiration, or intra-arterial perfusion of thrombolytics such as tPA or uPA or tenecpeplase

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels

mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stents to remove clots in proximal large vessels, combined or not with distal aspiration, combined or not with IV thrombolytics

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rescue mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels

In addition to mechanical thrombectomy in proximal large vessels, mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels with small stent retrievers combined or not with contact aspiration, or intra-arterial perfusion of thrombolytics such as tPA or uPA or tenecpeplase

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* any patient with a large vessel occlusion in the M1 or M2 segment of the MCA (Middle Cerebral Artery), supraclinoid ICA (Internal Carotid Artery), or basilar artery who is a candidate for thrombectomy
* with a persistent distal occlusion in M2-M4, A1-A5, P1-P5 after successful recanalization of the proximal clot with mechanical thrombectomy and/or IV thrombolysis

Exclusion Criteria

* poor 3 month prognosis from comorbidities
* evidence of active bleeding on examination
* recent surgery with a significant risk of bleeding
* VKA (Vitamin K Antagonists) oral anticoagulation with INR (International Normalized Ratio) - \> 1.7
* curative heparin or direct oral anticoagulants in previous 48 hours
* platelet count \< 100 000/mm3
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniela Iancu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHUM - Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Daniela Iancu, MD

Role: CONTACT

15148908000 ext. 8450

Guylaine Gevry, BSc

Role: CONTACT

15148908000 ext. 27235

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Guylaine Gevry, BSc

Role: primary

15148908000 ext. 27235

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-11741

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Minor Stroke Therapy Evaluation
NCT03796468 RECRUITING NA
Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation
NCT03811769 TERMINATED NA