Prognostic Value of the SGA and NUTRIC in the ICU

NCT ID: NCT03176602

Last Updated: 2017-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

503 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-01

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are two nutrition assessment tools that are commonly used in the ICU, namely the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill Score (mNUTRIC). It has been proposed that both assessments should be performed in the ICU but their combined prognostic ability has not been adequately assessed.

This study aimed to: 1) determine the agreement between SGA and mNUTRIC scores, and 2) quantify their utility in discriminating and quantifying hospital mortality risk both independently and in combination.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective observational study will be conducted in a 35-bed mixed ICU in Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, and all the intensivists and nurses will be blinded to the objectives of the study. All patients admitted to the ICU will be consecutively included in the study. For patients readmitted to the ICU during the same hospitalisation, only data from the first admission will be collected.

As per routine care, all patients will have their nutritional status assessed by the dietitian within 48 hours of ICU admission. Information required for the nutritional assessment (SGA) will be obtained from the patients or their main care givers, and nutritional status will be dichotomized into well-nourished and malnourished.

The electronic medical records automatically and prospectively collects all data required to calculate the mNUTRIC. At the end of the study, the mNUTRIC will be retrospectively calculated. Patients with values of "0-4" will be classified as low-mNUTRIC and "5-9" as high-mNUTRIC.

The primary outcome will be hospital mortality and all patients will be followed until discharge or death, for up to one year after admission to the ICU.

Agreement and mortality discriminative value (i.e. discrimination) of the 2-category classification of mNUTRIC (Low- and high-mNUTRIC) and SGA (SGA-A and SGA-B/C) will be assessed by Kappa statistics and C-statistics respectively.

A multivariate logistic regression will be used to generate the adjusted odds ratios that quantify the association between high-mNUTRIC, malnutrition, and their combination (mNUTRIC ≥ 5 and SGA-B/C) with hospital mortality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Malnutrition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

All patients admitted to the ICU

All patients ≥ 18 years old who had ≥ 24 hours length of stay in the ICU

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years old who had ≥ 24 hours length of stay in the ICU
* received a nutrition assessment (SGA) from a dietitian within 48 hours of admission to the ICU

Exclusion Criteria

* Nil
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Flinders University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National University of Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

JurongHealth

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Coltman A, Peterson S, Roehl K, Roosevelt H, Sowa D. Use of 3 tools to assess nutrition risk in the intensive care unit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Jan;39(1):28-33. doi: 10.1177/0148607114532135. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24748598 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014/00878/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.