Early Enteral Feeding and Clinical Outcomes in ICU Patients
NCT ID: NCT07131098
Last Updated: 2025-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19
NCT06134674
Evaluation of Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children
NCT04013893
Evaluation of Status of Early Reached Target Enteral Nutrition and IFABP as Biomarker of Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Children
NCT02598375
Evaluation of Immunonutrition For Patients With Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit.
NCT05463458
Nutrition Practice in Critically Ill Adults
NCT06576895
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study was motivated by the well-established role of early enteral nutrition in maintaining gut integrity, supporting immune function, and reducing complications in ICU patients. Despite international guidelines recommending its use within 24-48 hours of ICU admission, early enteral feeding remains underutilized in many low-resource healthcare settings. Factors contributing to this gap include variability in clinical practice, limited institutional protocols, and staff training constraints.
This investigation was carried out between January and April 2024 and followed rigorous ethical standards, with Institutional Review Board approval from Arab American University (Reference: R-2024/B/85/N). Patients were grouped based on the time period of admission into either a protocol-based early feeding group or a standard care group. Intervention fidelity was maintained through a pre-defined feeding protocol implemented by ICU staff after appropriate orientation and monitoring.
The study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting structured nutritional protocols in ICUs and highlights the feasibility and benefits of such interventions in middle-income and resource-constrained settings. The data gathered and analyzed provide a foundation for future policy development aimed at standardizing nutritional support for critically ill patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early Enteral Feeding Protocol
Participants in this group received early enteral nutrition initiated within 24-48 hours of ICU admission, based on a structured feeding protocol. The protocol followed international guidelines (ASPEN/ESPEN) and was implemented by ICU staff with training and monitoring support.
Early Enteral Feeding Protocol
Early enteral nutrition was initiated within 24-48 hours of ICU admission based on a structured protocol aligned with ASPEN and ESPEN guidelines. The protocol defined target caloric goals, methods of tube feeding initiation, rate advancement, and monitoring procedures. Nurses and ICU staff were trained in protocol implementation. The goal was to optimize nutrition early in critical illness to improve clinical outcomes such as ICU length of stay, ventilator dependence, and physiological stability.
Standard Nutritional Care
Participants in this group received standard ICU nutritional care without the implementation of the early enteral feeding protocol. Feeding initiation and type were left to physician discretion based on clinical judgment and routine hospital practices.
Standard Nutritional Care
Patients in the control group received standard nutritional care per routine hospital practices. Initiation and progression of feeding were left to the discretion of the attending physician and nursing staff, without the use of a structured protocol or defined early feeding timeline.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early Enteral Feeding Protocol
Early enteral nutrition was initiated within 24-48 hours of ICU admission based on a structured protocol aligned with ASPEN and ESPEN guidelines. The protocol defined target caloric goals, methods of tube feeding initiation, rate advancement, and monitoring procedures. Nurses and ICU staff were trained in protocol implementation. The goal was to optimize nutrition early in critical illness to improve clinical outcomes such as ICU length of stay, ventilator dependence, and physiological stability.
Standard Nutritional Care
Patients in the control group received standard nutritional care per routine hospital practices. Initiation and progression of feeding were left to the discretion of the attending physician and nursing staff, without the use of a structured protocol or defined early feeding timeline.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Admitted to the ICU and eligible for enteral feeding
* Expected to stay in the ICU for more than 48 hours
* Able to initiate enteral feeding within 24-48 hours of ICU admission
* Informed consent obtained from the patient or legal guardian
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding or obstruction
* Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery or with short bowel syndrome
* Diagnosed with COVID-19 during admission
* End-of-life care patients or those with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders
* Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Loai Muawiah Zabin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Loai Muawiah Zabin
Faculty Member, Arab American University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hussein Mahameed, Master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Arab American University (Palestine)
Sajed Ghawadra, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Arab American University (Palestine)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jenin Governmental Hospital
Jenin, , Palestinian Territories
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAUP-EEFP-ICU-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.