Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-through Versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
NCT ID: NCT03174028
Last Updated: 2017-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-01
2020-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Anterior Versus Posterior Laparoscopic Mesh Rectopexy For Rectal Prolapse; a Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT03026738
Surgical Treatment for ODS With Rectal Prolapse Surgical Treatment for Rectal Prolapse
NCT03487640
Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
NCT00946205
Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA
NCT07343622
EFFECTIVENESS of PRE-OPERATIVE BOWEL PREPARATION VS NO BOWEL PREPARATION on OUTCOMES of PEDIATRIC COLORECTAL SURGERIES
NCT06745505
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are many historical operations for the management of the high type, but the most popular operation now is the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty which was published for the first time in 1982. Children undergoing posterior sagittal anorectoplasty may have lifelong bowel management problems of constipation, incontinence, and encopresis.
After the introduction of laparoscopy in pediatric surgery, many surgeons hope that the use of laparoscopy instead of posterior sagittal anorectoplasty may reduce the complications of the complications of the big incision and disturbance of sphincter mechanism which occur in posterior sagittal anorectoplasty operation. In addition to its role in diagnosis in complex anomalies like cloaca which is well established now. So the question is to what extent can the laparoscopy replace usual surgery for anorectal malformation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
laparoscopic group
laparoscopic pull-through
laparoscopic pull-through
laparoscopic pull-through
posterior sagittal group
posterior sagittal anorectoplasty
laparoscopic pull-through
laparoscopic pull-through
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laparoscopic pull-through
laparoscopic pull-through
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Female child with vestibular anus
* case with short distal pouch
6 Months
3 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Gamal Abdelmalek
principle investigator
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
lAR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.