Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopic-assisted Rectosigmoid Resection Versus Laparoscopic Rectosigmoid Resection With Transrectal Specimen Retrieval

NCT ID: NCT01033838

Last Updated: 2024-07-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2025-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic anterior resection is a standardized procedure requiring a small muscle split incision to retrieve the specimen and to fashion the proximal part of the double stapled anastomosis. Most patients can be included within a standardized perioperative care program called Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). A new evolution as a primary step towards a complete Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)-procedure is a hybrid approach (transrectal and laparoscopic). The dissection is performed laparoscopically but the specimen is retrieved within an endobag through the rectum. The anastomosis is created intracorporeally using a triple stapled technique. There are no trials available in the literature concerning these 2 techniques. Therefore this study will be undertaken to establish the role of the 2 surgical procedures and to compare them after short-term follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Symptomatic Recurrent Diverticular Disease Benign Adenomatous Sigmoidal Polyp, Requiring Surgery Early Non-transmural Sigmoidtumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

laparoscopic-assisted rectosigmoid resection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rectosigmoid resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection and transrectal retrieval

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rectosigmoid resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rectosigmoid resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-90
* Symptomatic recurrent diverticular disease
* Benign adenomatous polyp, requiring surgery
* Early non-transmural sigmoidtumor
* Signed written informed consent, approved by ethical committee

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unsuitable for laparoscopy
* Pregnancy
* ASA \>III
* Coagulation disorders
* Anti-coagulants
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Albert M Wolthuis, MD

Role: CONTACT

+3216344265

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wolthuis AM, Fieuws S, Van Den Bosch A, de Buck van Overstraeten A, D'Hoore A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic colectomy with or without natural-orifice specimen extraction. Br J Surg. 2015 May;102(6):630-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9757. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25764376 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S51801-B32220097328

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.