Bowel, Urinary and Sexual Function After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT00451165
Last Updated: 2010-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
36 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-05-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Method: Questionnaire and function tests
Hypothesis: A laparoscopic nerve-sparing operation is not inferior to reported open surgery in preserving urinary and sexual function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lower Urinary Tract and Sexual Function in Women Following Surgery for Colorectal Disorders
NCT00667550
Assessing Infectious Risk and Visceral Closure in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)
NCT01102725
Multicenter Study on Postoperative Urinary and Sexual Function During Laparoscopic Functional Total Mesorectum Excision
NCT05049317
Incidence of The Bowel, Bladder, and Sexual Dysfunction Following Surgery for Colorectal Malignancy
NCT04134104
Same-Day Colectomy: is it Safe for Patients?
NCT07176715
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We examine the frequency of bowel, urinary and sexual dysfunction prospectively in patients who received laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
We examine before operation, 7 days after, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after operation, by questionnaires (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) 、Short Form-8 (SF8)、International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form(ICIQ-SF)、International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS)、Gastro-Intestinal Functional Outcome(GIFO)) and function tests (uroflowmetry and US).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
colon
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
rectum
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Laparoscopic right colon resection/laparoscopic rectal surgery
* 20-80 years old
* ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous proctectomy
* Severe urinary dysfunction
20 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kyoto University
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yoshiharu Sakai, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Kyoto University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kyoto University Hospital
Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-282
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.