Anterior Perineal Plane for Ultra Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum

NCT ID: NCT00534131

Last Updated: 2023-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-04-01

Study Completion Date

2015-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anal sphincter preserving operations are now commonplace for both cancer and non-cancerous rectal diseases. However, this has not always been the case and this development has been facilitated by the invention of circular stapling instruments, which allow the bowel to be reconnected to the anal sphincters, where it would almost be impossible to do so manually. Nevertheless, some patients still require a permanent ostomy, as even with stapling devices ultra low joins of the bowel and sphincter muscles cannot always be performed by a conventional surgery. Therefore, a variety of alternative techniques have been proposed to avoid a permanent ostomy, but these have not become widespread due to the technical difficulty in performing them, their failure to completely eradicate rectal disease, and the damage they inflict upon the anal sphincters resulting in poor bowel function after surgery.

The ideal ultra low sphincter preserving operation should remove the rectal disease entirely, allow the small or large bowel to be safely joined to the anal sphincters under direct vision, and retain the sphincter mechanism in its entirety. We propose such a technique that we term the APPEAR procedure, which approaches the lower third of the rectum via an incision between the scrotum or vagina, and the anal sphincters. This procedure preserves sphincter integrity, and allows either a stapled or manual join of the bowel to the sphincter mechanism, under direct vision. This trial is being conducted as a pilot study, with the procedure only offered to patients for whom a conventional sphincter saving procedure was technically impossible, or contraindicated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is recruiting patients with distal third rectal pathology, for whom a conventional sphincter saving procedure is contraindicated, or likely to be technically impossible.

Recruited patients will initially undergo trial dissection by conventional sphincter preserving surgical techniques, which if successful will result in patients entering study arm 1.

However, should this not be possible, a trial anterior perineal dissection will be attempted, with patients entered into study arm 2 if perineal dissection is adequate to allow full rectal excision, and preserve sphincter integrity.

If during a trial of anterior perineal dissection it is decided that sphincter preservation is not safe, or will not allow eradication of rectal disease, conventional proctectomy will be performed, with patients entering study arm 3.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Neoplasms Colitis, Ischemic Colitis, Ulcerative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

Patients for whom a standard abdominal approach is adequate to excise the distal third of the rectum (without jeopardising oncological clearance if appropriate).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision

Arm 2

Combined abdominal and trans-perineal approach to excise the distal third of the rectum, while preserving the anal canal

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

APPEAR Procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Perineal incision to reach the distal rectum

Arm 3

Standard proctectomy to excise the distal third of the rectum and the anal canal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Proctectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

standard rectal excision which does not preserve the anal canal

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision

Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

APPEAR Procedure

Perineal incision to reach the distal rectum

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Proctectomy

standard rectal excision which does not preserve the anal canal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Anterior Perineal PlanE for ultra low rectal excision

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients regardless of sex
* Undergoing surgery (with curative intent) to excise the lower third of the rectum who may require a permanent stoma
* Deemed suitable by multidisciplinary team.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under the age of 16
* Patients in whom sphincter preservation has already been deemed inappropriate for medical or surgical reasons (e.g. by an MDT for oncological cure), or in whom surgery has been deemed generally inappropriate.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Mary University of London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Prof Norman S Williams, MS FRCS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London

Charles H Knowles, PhD FRCS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London

Khalid El-Gendy, MBBS MRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre For Academic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital

London, England, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Williams NS, Murphy J, Knowles CH. Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum (the APPEAR technique): a prospective clinical trial of a new procedure. Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):750-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b2ee3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18438111 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09/H0704/30

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.