Anterior Perineal Plane for Ultra Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum
NCT ID: NCT00534131
Last Updated: 2023-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-04-01
2015-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The ideal ultra low sphincter preserving operation should remove the rectal disease entirely, allow the small or large bowel to be safely joined to the anal sphincters under direct vision, and retain the sphincter mechanism in its entirety. We propose such a technique that we term the APPEAR procedure, which approaches the lower third of the rectum via an incision between the scrotum or vagina, and the anal sphincters. This procedure preserves sphincter integrity, and allows either a stapled or manual join of the bowel to the sphincter mechanism, under direct vision. This trial is being conducted as a pilot study, with the procedure only offered to patients for whom a conventional sphincter saving procedure was technically impossible, or contraindicated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Visualisation of Anastomosis in Colorectal Cancer Surgery
NCT04738240
Rectal Cancer Surgery Without Mechanical Bowel Preparation
NCT00554892
Abdominoperineal Extra-Elevators Rectal Resection for Cancer: Prone Position vs. Supine Position
NCT02163785
Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial On Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Coloanal Anastomosis For Rectal
NCT01766661
Gluteal Turnover Flap for Closure of the Perineal Wound After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04004650
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recruited patients will initially undergo trial dissection by conventional sphincter preserving surgical techniques, which if successful will result in patients entering study arm 1.
However, should this not be possible, a trial anterior perineal dissection will be attempted, with patients entered into study arm 2 if perineal dissection is adequate to allow full rectal excision, and preserve sphincter integrity.
If during a trial of anterior perineal dissection it is decided that sphincter preservation is not safe, or will not allow eradication of rectal disease, conventional proctectomy will be performed, with patients entering study arm 3.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Patients for whom a standard abdominal approach is adequate to excise the distal third of the rectum (without jeopardising oncological clearance if appropriate).
Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision
Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision
Arm 2
Combined abdominal and trans-perineal approach to excise the distal third of the rectum, while preserving the anal canal
APPEAR Procedure
Perineal incision to reach the distal rectum
Arm 3
Standard proctectomy to excise the distal third of the rectum and the anal canal
Proctectomy
standard rectal excision which does not preserve the anal canal
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision
Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision
APPEAR Procedure
Perineal incision to reach the distal rectum
Proctectomy
standard rectal excision which does not preserve the anal canal
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing surgery (with curative intent) to excise the lower third of the rectum who may require a permanent stoma
* Deemed suitable by multidisciplinary team.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients in whom sphincter preservation has already been deemed inappropriate for medical or surgical reasons (e.g. by an MDT for oncological cure), or in whom surgery has been deemed generally inappropriate.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen Mary University of London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prof Norman S Williams, MS FRCS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London
Charles H Knowles, PhD FRCS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London
Khalid El-Gendy, MBBS MRCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre For Academic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital
London, England, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Williams NS, Murphy J, Knowles CH. Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum (the APPEAR technique): a prospective clinical trial of a new procedure. Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):750-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b2ee3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09/H0704/30
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.