Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA
NCT ID: NCT07343622
Last Updated: 2026-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-30
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Robot-assisted With Laparoscopic-assisted Modified Soave Procedure for Classical Hirschsprung Disease
NCT06197061
Laparoscopically Assisted Anorectal Pull-through Versus Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
NCT03174028
Anti-peristaltic Ileo-sigmoid Anastomosis for the Treatment of Slow-transit Constipation:Therapeutic Evaluation
NCT02147574
Analysis of the Causes of Redo Pull-through for Recurrent Constipation and the Risk Factors Affecting the Prognosis of the Hirschsprung's Disease and Allied Disorders
NCT06175598
EFFECTIVENESS of PRE-OPERATIVE BOWEL PREPARATION VS NO BOWEL PREPARATION on OUTCOMES of PEDIATRIC COLORECTAL SURGERIES
NCT06745505
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among available options, the Duhamel procedure and the modified Soave pull-through are the two most commonly adopted techniques. The Duhamel approach, particularly when combined with a transanal external transection, preserves a retrorectal colonic reservoir, which may reduce anastomotic tension and theoretically improve postoperative bowel function. However, concerns remain regarding fecal stasis, residual spur formation, and the potential risk of postoperative enterocolitis. In contrast, the modified Soave procedure achieves complete endorectal pull-through and eliminates the aganglionic rectal segment, but it may be associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture, cuff-related obstruction, and impaired anorectal motility, especially in patients with extensive disease such as TCA.
With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques, both procedures have been refined; nevertheless, direct comparative data evaluating functional outcomes, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, and perioperative parameters between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures-particularly in total colonic disease-remain scarce. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed, standardized comparison of these two surgical strategies in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA.
Therefore, this multicenter study aims to compare robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with total colonic Hirschsprung disease who underwent neonatal enterostomy, with a primary focus on postoperative bowel function and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transanal Transection Duhamel Pull-Through for total colonic aganglionosis
Arm A: Robot-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel (Modified Duhamel)
Procedure: Robot-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted abdominal mobilization (as per center standard) plus transanal external transection Duhamel pull-through with retrorectal channel creation and side-to-side colorectal/coloanal anastomosis according to a standardized operative protocol.
Perioperative care: Standardized bowel preparation (if used), antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative feeding pathway, and anal dilatation schedule per protocol.
Transanal Transection Duhamel operation
The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.
Modified Soave Pull-Through for total colonic aganglionosis
Arm B: Modified Soave Pull-Through
Procedure: Minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robot-assisted per center capability) mobilization plus modified Soave endorectal pull-through with mucosectomy/cuff management according to a standardized operative protocol.
Perioperative care: Same enhanced recovery and dilatation protocol framework.
Modified Soave Pull-Through
The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transanal Transection Duhamel operation
The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.
Modified Soave Pull-Through
The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Two-stage surgical strategy: neonatal enterostomy performed first, followed by definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure.
3. Planned definitive reconstruction by one of the following techniques:
4. Robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel, orModified Soave pull-through (minimally invasive abdominal phase allowed).
5. Availability for follow-up assessments and outcomes collection per protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Definitive surgery performed by open laparotomy approach or Swenson procedure.
3. One-stage primary pull-through without neonatal enterostomy (single-stage definitive management).
1 Month
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
OTHER
Shenzhen Longhua District Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital
UNKNOWN
The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College
UNKNOWN
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Zunyi Medical College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zebing Zheng
Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Saotao Tang, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
Zunyi, Guizhou, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Minford JL, Ram A, Turnock RR, Lamont GL, Kenny SE, Rintala RJ, Lloyd DA, Baillie CT. Comparison of functional outcomes of Duhamel and transanal endorectal coloanal anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Feb;39(2):161-5; discussion 161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.10.004.
Bhandarkar K, De Coppi P, Cross K, Blackburn S, Curry J. Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Multidisciplinary Management after Ileorectal Duhamel Pull-Through for Total Colonic Aganglionosis-20-Year Experience in a Tertiary Surgical Center. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Oct;34(5):423-429. doi: 10.1055/a-2181-2065. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
Zhang X, Cao GQ, Tang ST, Chang XP, Li S, Yang L, Li K, Zhou Y, Yang DH. Laparoscopic-assisted Duhamel procedure with ex-anal rectal transection for total colonic aganglionosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):531-536. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Halaweish I, Srinivas S, Farooqui Z, Sutthatarn P, Campbell D, Frischer J, Wood RJ, Langer JC. Duhamel Versus Swenson Pull-Through for Total Colonic Aganglionosis: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Feb;59(2):216-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
No. MS-2025-406
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
TCA/total colonic aganglionosi
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.