Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA

NCT ID: NCT07343622

Last Updated: 2026-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-30

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA) is the most severe form of Hirschsprung disease and is commonly managed with neonatal enterostomy followed by delayed definitive pull-through. Despite widespread use, the optimal reconstructive procedure for TCA remains uncertain. The Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through procedures are the two most frequently adopted techniques, each with distinct theoretical advantages and limitations regarding bowel function, enterocolitis risk, and anorectal physiology. With the increasing application of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery, both procedures have been further refined; however, robust comparative evidence, particularly for total colonic disease, is lacking. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed comparison of postoperative functional outcomes and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures. This multicenter study compares robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA after neonatal enterostomy, focusing on postoperative bowel function and enterocolitis incidence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA), also referred to as total colonic aganglionosis, represents the most severe phenotype of Hirschsprung disease and remains a major surgical challenge. Owing to extensive aganglionosis, poor nutritional status, and high risk of enterocolitis in the neonatal period, the current standard of care in most centers consists of neonatal enterostomy followed by a delayed definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure. Despite advances in minimally invasive techniques, the optimal reconstructive strategy for TCA has not been established.

Among available options, the Duhamel procedure and the modified Soave pull-through are the two most commonly adopted techniques. The Duhamel approach, particularly when combined with a transanal external transection, preserves a retrorectal colonic reservoir, which may reduce anastomotic tension and theoretically improve postoperative bowel function. However, concerns remain regarding fecal stasis, residual spur formation, and the potential risk of postoperative enterocolitis. In contrast, the modified Soave procedure achieves complete endorectal pull-through and eliminates the aganglionic rectal segment, but it may be associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture, cuff-related obstruction, and impaired anorectal motility, especially in patients with extensive disease such as TCA.

With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques, both procedures have been refined; nevertheless, direct comparative data evaluating functional outcomes, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, and perioperative parameters between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures-particularly in total colonic disease-remain scarce. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed, standardized comparison of these two surgical strategies in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA.

Therefore, this multicenter study aims to compare robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with total colonic Hirschsprung disease who underwent neonatal enterostomy, with a primary focus on postoperative bowel function and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Colonic Aganglionosis Hirschsprung Disease Duhamel Soave

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transanal Transection Duhamel Pull-Through for total colonic aganglionosis

Arm A: Robot-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel (Modified Duhamel)

Procedure: Robot-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted abdominal mobilization (as per center standard) plus transanal external transection Duhamel pull-through with retrorectal channel creation and side-to-side colorectal/coloanal anastomosis according to a standardized operative protocol.

Perioperative care: Standardized bowel preparation (if used), antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative feeding pathway, and anal dilatation schedule per protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transanal Transection Duhamel operation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.

Modified Soave Pull-Through for total colonic aganglionosis

Arm B: Modified Soave Pull-Through

Procedure: Minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robot-assisted per center capability) mobilization plus modified Soave endorectal pull-through with mucosectomy/cuff management according to a standardized operative protocol.

Perioperative care: Same enhanced recovery and dilatation protocol framework.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Modified Soave Pull-Through

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transanal Transection Duhamel operation

The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Modified Soave Pull-Through

The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Definitive diagnosis of total colonic Hirschsprung disease confirmed by pathology from biopsy at neonatal enterostomy, consistent with total colonic aganglionosis.
2. Two-stage surgical strategy: neonatal enterostomy performed first, followed by definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure.
3. Planned definitive reconstruction by one of the following techniques:
4. Robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel, orModified Soave pull-through (minimally invasive abdominal phase allowed).
5. Availability for follow-up assessments and outcomes collection per protocol.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome).
2. Definitive surgery performed by open laparotomy approach or Swenson procedure.
3. One-stage primary pull-through without neonatal enterostomy (single-stage definitive management).
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shenzhen Longhua District Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zunyi Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zebing Zheng

Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Saotao Tang, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Zunyi, Guizhou, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

zebing zheng, M.D

Role: CONTACT

+86-19985120815

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zhu Jin, M.D

Role: primary

+852-28609433

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Minford JL, Ram A, Turnock RR, Lamont GL, Kenny SE, Rintala RJ, Lloyd DA, Baillie CT. Comparison of functional outcomes of Duhamel and transanal endorectal coloanal anastomosis for Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Feb;39(2):161-5; discussion 161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.10.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14966732 (View on PubMed)

Bhandarkar K, De Coppi P, Cross K, Blackburn S, Curry J. Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Multidisciplinary Management after Ileorectal Duhamel Pull-Through for Total Colonic Aganglionosis-20-Year Experience in a Tertiary Surgical Center. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Oct;34(5):423-429. doi: 10.1055/a-2181-2065. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37748721 (View on PubMed)

Zhang X, Cao GQ, Tang ST, Chang XP, Li S, Yang L, Li K, Zhou Y, Yang DH. Laparoscopic-assisted Duhamel procedure with ex-anal rectal transection for total colonic aganglionosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):531-536. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28705638 (View on PubMed)

Halaweish I, Srinivas S, Farooqui Z, Sutthatarn P, Campbell D, Frischer J, Wood RJ, Langer JC. Duhamel Versus Swenson Pull-Through for Total Colonic Aganglionosis: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Feb;59(2):216-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.017. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37973423 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

No. MS-2025-406

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TCA/total colonic aganglionosi

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Sigmoid Volvulus
NCT06771349 COMPLETED