Appropriateness of Intravenous Antibiotics Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge

NCT ID: NCT03173768

Last Updated: 2017-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

173 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-01

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A quasi-experimental study was conducted among patients receiving care at the medicine units of the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital to determine the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge with and without ID consultation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The pre-intervention period was started from November 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016 (6-month period), in which the intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were prescribed by the primary care team. The post-intervention period was started from May 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017 (10-month period), in which the intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were reviewed and intervened by ID team.

The appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics was assessed separately by the ID fellow and ID specialist. If disagreement occurred, the feedback to the ID fellow was performed and the decision by ID specialist was used in the final analysis of appropriateness.

In post-intervention period, ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics

Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anti-Infectives Adverse Reaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pre-intervention period

The charts of patients who were prescribed intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were reviewed. Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics was assessed by ID specialists.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

post-intervention period

The intervention is the charts of patients who were prescribed intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge by the primary team were prospectively reviewed and intervened by ID team (ID specialist approval)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ID specialist approval

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team was assessed by ID specialist. ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics. Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ID specialist approval

Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team was assessed by ID specialist. ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics. Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All adult patients who met the following criteria were consecutively enrolled;

1. age≄ 15 years old and
2. had infections at any sites and received intravenous antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria

\- They were evaluated by infectious diseases specialist for appropriate antibiotics during admission
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiang Mai University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Romanee Chaiwarith

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Romanee Chaiwarith, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Medicine

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3631

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.