The Effect of Simulation-Based Training on Performance and Stress in the Clinical Setting
NCT ID: NCT03163927
Last Updated: 2017-05-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-01
2017-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will compare the effect of the training to a control group of novices receiving standard training and additionally to an intermediate and an expert group.
The study will provide insight into the translational effect from the simulation based setting to clinical performance. Further, the study will explore: if stress decreases operators' performance; if operators stress affects the patient stress level; and the effect of SBML on patient-related outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brown Adipose Tissue Activation by Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT04326192
Treatment With Spinal Cord Stimulation: Effect on Sensory Parameters
NCT01261468
Acute and Chronic Repercussion of Spinal Cord Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07210411
Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT05885061
Epidural Stimulation After Neurologic Damage: Long-Term Outcomes
NCT05705453
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The traditional training for junior physicians has been guided by the expectation that experience will lead to mastery. This assumption has been disproved by simulation based and observational studies calling for more educational research including its impact on patient outcomes. A contrast to the maxim of "see one, do one, teach one" is mastery learning (ML). ML implies that learners should practice and re-test until they reach a designated mastery level, making the final level the same for all, although the time taken to reach that level may vary.
Novices trained by simulation based training with mastery learning (SBML) achieve a higher performance level than more experienced physicians only having received clinical training. However, the translational effect into the clinical context is unknown as the training and assessment of competence was performed in the simulation based setting, not integrating aspects as patient communication and positioning. For the lumbar puncture, the complexity of the procedure pertains to both technical and non-technical aspects as patient interaction, communication, the corporation with the assistant and environmental conditions.
Hence, there is a need for more knowledge on the effect of simulation-based training with mastery learning for junior doctors' performance in the clinical setting which should include the effect on patient-related outcomes.
As novices describe a fear of doing harm and hold performance related uncertainty, they may be susceptible to experience a stress sensation. Stress during performance of clinical procedures reduces the working memory and is associated with impaired performance. Expert performers' reports that stress during the procedure performance might be transmitted to the patient. Patients experiencing stress during the procedure holds a significantly increased risk of a prolonged duration of post dural puncture headache.
Stress- stimuli, experience, and responses are complex, as the judgment on whether a situation is perceived as pleasant or threatening depends on the individuals' appraisal, which is based: on previous experience; previous learning; the setting and expectations of the outcome. Stress stimuli arise when the appreciation of the situation is negative. Performers holding a strategy for their performance during stress are less prone to experience a stress sensation. Hence, the integration of a strategy for performing the procedure, based on the experts' process goals might benefit novices' risk of experiencing stress during procedure performance. The effect on such stress reduction to the patient experience of stress and the risks of procedure-related side effects has never been investigated.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of simulation-based training with mastery learning on novices' lumbar puncture performance, patient related outcomes and stress experienced by the physicians and patients during the procedure. The effect and outcomes will be compared with intermediate and expert lumbar puncture performers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Participants receive a 1.5-hour standardized simulation-based training course, with mastery learning.
Simulation-based training
See arm description
Control
Participants observe a procedure performed by a senior.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Simulation-based training
See arm description
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Speaking Danish fluently
* Glasgow Coma Scale 15
* Referred to the outpatient clinic for a lumbar puncture.
* Proficiency in the Danish Language
* Age between 18 and 80 years
* Understand study implications and co-operate without a need for personal assistance.
* Providing written and orally informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous formal training in the lumbar puncture procedure
Eligible patients:
* Lumbar puncture intended on suspicion of Alzheimer or other dementia diagnosis.
* Cognitive impairment, assessed by the study investigator or local nurse/doctor
* Physical disabilities, requiring personal assistance.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
TrygFonden, Denmark
INDUSTRY
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen
Principal Investigator, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mikael J Henriksen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CAMES - Rigshospitalet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup
Glostrup Municipality, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Department of Neuology, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zealand
Roskilde, Region Sjælland, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
StressLBP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.