Comparison of the Efficacy of a Protocol for the Withdrawal of Neurosedation From the Usual Strategy in Cerebroses

NCT ID: NCT03114904

Last Updated: 2020-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-27

Study Completion Date

2018-05-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The withdrawal syndrome in benzodiazepines and morphine is common in intensive care, the incidence is estimated at 32.1%.

Cerebrospatized patients are probably more prone to withdrawal because they require high doses of sedation.

Moreover, this syndrome is probably deleterious on the cerebral hemodynamics (high point of the therapeutic management).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Withdrawal Syndrome Cerebral Lesion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

"Usual" weaning management

Group Type OTHER

Variation of Jasinski score between H0 (stop of sedatives) and H6

Intervention Type OTHER

To compare the effectiveness of a withdrawal management protocol with the usual management in cerebral patients (Subarachnoid haemorrhage (HSA), stroke and head trauma (CT))

Introduction to H2 for the discontinuation of therapeutics

Group Type OTHER

Variation of Jasinski score between H0 (stop of sedatives) and H6

Intervention Type OTHER

To compare the effectiveness of a withdrawal management protocol with the usual management in cerebral patients (Subarachnoid haemorrhage (HSA), stroke and head trauma (CT))

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Variation of Jasinski score between H0 (stop of sedatives) and H6

To compare the effectiveness of a withdrawal management protocol with the usual management in cerebral patients (Subarachnoid haemorrhage (HSA), stroke and head trauma (CT))

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major Patient
* Admitted in Neuroreanimation
* Cerebroséé (TC-HSA-AVC)
* Mono or multi failing
* After a neurosedation ≥ 3 days by hypnotic type benzodiazepine (Midazolam®) and morphinomimetic (Sufentanyl®) in IVSE
* Affiliation to Social Security
* Agreement of the person of confidence

Exclusion Criteria

* Addiction to opiates, cocaine or cannabis
* Neurological Pathology Before Hospitalization
* Patient suffering from cardiac arrest
* Pregnant woman
* Sedation window
* Patient under tutelage or curatorship or deprived of public law
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Amiens Picardie

Amiens, Picardie, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PI2015_843_0019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Post-SCI Hypotension
NCT02919917 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Treatment of Orthostatic Hypotension in SCI
NCT05839652 RECRUITING PHASE4
Sodium Lactate and Brain Relaxation (LSD)
NCT04488874 COMPLETED PHASE3