Carbapenems De-escalation as Antimicrobial Stewardship

NCT ID: NCT03114358

Last Updated: 2017-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-01

Study Completion Date

2017-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Early de-escalation of carbapenems can reduce unnecessary use of carbaepenems compared with late de-escalation without compromised clinical outcomes

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A cluster randomized control trial was conducted among patients receiving care at the medicine units of the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.

Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups. The standard group followed the hospital policy in which carbapenems were evaluated by ID specialist at 72 hours of admission (late de-escalation). De-escalation may occurred earlier depends upon the decision of the primary care team. The intervention group is de-escalation carbapenems early within 24 hours or no later than 72 hours of prescription by ID specialist (early de-escalation).

Clinical outcomes included rate of de-escalation within the first 24 hour, the mortality rate, and other clinical outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early carbapenems de-escalation

De-escalation carbapenems within 24 hours or no later than 72 hours of prescription by Infectious disease specialist (early de-escalation).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early Carbapenem de-escalation

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention group is de-escalation carbapenems early within 24 hours or no later than 72 hours of prescription by ID specialist (early de-escalation).

Late carbapenems de-escalation

De-escalation followed the hospital policy in which carbapenems were evaluated by ID specialist at 72 hours of admission (late de-escalation). De-escalation may occurred earlier depends upon the decision of the primary care team

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early Carbapenem de-escalation

The intervention group is de-escalation carbapenems early within 24 hours or no later than 72 hours of prescription by ID specialist (early de-escalation).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adult patients aged ≥ 15 years old
* received carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin) empirically within 24-72 hours for the first time during admission
* able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* They were in the intensive care units, or had neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \< 1,000 cell/mm3)
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiang Mai University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Romanee Chaiwarith

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3629

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.