Efficacy of the CO-OP Approach With Brazilian Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder

NCT ID: NCT03112746

Last Updated: 2017-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-26

Study Completion Date

2010-03-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) have difficulties performing daily activities which reflects negatively on participation, impacting their lives. To date, there are a number of interventions to improve performance of these children on activities they want or need to. In Brazil, there is little research on the efficacy of such approaches. Our main objective was to start a set of studies to examine the effects of the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance Approach (CO-OP Approach) protocol on occupational performance and satisfaction of Brazilian children who have DCD; to examine whether children were able to transfer strategies and skills learned during CO-OP to untrained goals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background. Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) have difficulties performing daily activities which reflects negatively on participation, impacting their lives. Objectives. To examine the effects of the Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance Approach (CO-OP Approach) protocol on occupational performance and satisfaction of Brazilian children who have DCD; to examine whether children were able to transfer strategies and skills learned during CO-OP to untrained goals. Methods. A pre-post group comparison design with eight boys aged 6-10 years old. Children participated in 12 CO-OP sessions with their parents twice a week, with an extra session added to the protocol for parents´ orientation. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Performance Quality Rating Scale were used as outcome measures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Developmental Coordination Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance

One group was submitted to the CO-OP approach to learn cognitive strategies to perform the chosen tasks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In CO-OP Approach, therapists use mediational techniques to teach cognitive strategies - GOAL, PLAN, DO, CHECK - to improve occupational performance in goals chosen by the children in collaboration with them and their parents.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance

In CO-OP Approach, therapists use mediational techniques to teach cognitive strategies - GOAL, PLAN, DO, CHECK - to improve occupational performance in goals chosen by the children in collaboration with them and their parents.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CO-OP Approach

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* poor motor performance measured by a motor performance test (cut off score below the 15th percentile).
* poor performance on academic and daily living activities measured by the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire answered by the parents.
* attending regular education with no evidence of marked school delay (over a year).
* cognitive development within the expected age range according to the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III).

Exclusion Criteria

* signs of neurological or neuromuscular disorder.
* presence of intellectual disability.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Minas Gerais

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Clarice Ribeiro Soares Araujo

Master in Rehabilitation Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Miller LT, Polatajko HJ, Missiuna C, Mandich AD, Macnab JJ. A pilot trial of a cognitive treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2001 Mar;20(1-2):183-210. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00034-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11471396 (View on PubMed)

Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ, Macnab JJ, Miller LT. Treatment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: what is the evidence? Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;20(2-3):51-68.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11345512 (View on PubMed)

Mandich AD, Polatajko HJ, Rodger S. Rites of passage: understanding participation of children with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2003 Nov;22(4-5):583-95. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14624835 (View on PubMed)

Green D, Chambers ME, Sugden DA. Does subtype of developmental coordination disorder count: is there a differential effect on outcome following intervention? Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Apr;27(2):363-82. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18400322 (View on PubMed)

Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004 Oct;71(4):210-22. doi: 10.1177/000841740407100406.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15586853 (View on PubMed)

Araujo CRS, Cardoso AA, Magalhaes LC. Efficacy of the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance with Brazilian children with developmental coordination disorder. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan;26(1):46-54. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1417476. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29260603 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COEP/UFMG ETIC Nº 103/2009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Let's CO-OPerate! Together we Are Stronger
NCT07085403 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA