Investigating Best Practices for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study of Two Approaches

NCT ID: NCT00430131

Last Updated: 2009-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-12-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project (CO-OP II) is the second in a series of three studies to validate a new treatment approach for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The initial study was comprised of a series of four single case studies with children with CP. It evaluated the potential of the Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach to be used with children with CP and tested the procedures for CO-OP II. The overall objective of the full series of studies is to determine whether better functional outcomes are achieved for children with CP with CO-OP intervention than with contemporary occupational therapy treatment.

The primary objective of CO-OP II is to establish the feasibility of conducting a full scale randomize control trial (RCT) to discover if there are differences in functional outcomes (i.e., improvement in task performance, self efficacy) between a group of children with CP receiving CO-OP therapy and a group receiving a contemporary treatment approach (CTA). In order to meet this objective, a pilot RCT will be conducted to answer the specific research questions outlined below:

1. Do children wiht CP acquire the skills they set as goals in each of the two treatment groups?
2. Do the acquired skills generalize and transfer?
3. Are the skills maintained at 4 months post intervention?
4. Does the CO-OP approach produce a larger effect on skill acquisition and self efficacy than the CTA?
5. Does amount of parent involvement have any effect on skill acquisition or self efficacy?

Completion of this pilot RCT will provide the necessary data to conduct a full study to test the following hypothesis:

\- Children with CP who receive CO-OP treatment will be more successful than children receiving CTA in improving their performance on child-chosen skills and they self efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Contemporary Treatment Approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* between 7 and 12 years of age
* diagnosis of cerebral palsy with hemiplegia or spastic diplegia
* Level 1,2 or 3 on the Gross Motor Function Classification Scale(GMFCS)
* normal intelligence (IQ\> 85 on at least one scale (verbal or performance) of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT-2)
* child assent and agreement to participate
* parental consent and agreement to participate
* sufficient language ability to communicate with and be understood during treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* previously received or presently receiving a cognitive treatment for motor-based performance problems
* use of alternative communication system such as PECS or communication board
* regular use of BOTOX during intervention period
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

ErinoakKids

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Toronto

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Debra L Cameron, PhD. O.T.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BKR-06-055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stop Tip-toeing Around Toe-walking
NCT04879199 COMPLETED NA