Disease Perception and Recovery From Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT03058315

Last Updated: 2019-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

828 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2019-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main purpose of the study is to investigate the importance of patients' beliefs regarding staying active despite low back pain, among patients referred from general practice to secondary care treatment in Denmark. It is hypothesised that patients believing that staying active will help them recover will have higher odds of a 30%-improvement in The Roland Morris Disability score after 52 weeks compared to patients disagreeing that staying active will lead to better recovery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: According to international guidelines on low back pain (LBP), advice to stay active should be provided from healthcare professionals to all patients with LBP. However, provision of advice to stay active is reported to be diverse. Some primary care healthcare professionals believe that avoidance of activities and work will help the patient recover. Consequently some patients are not receiving optimal advice to stay active and may think that inactivity will help them and consequently achieve less favourable treatment outcomes. Thus, changing patients' beliefs are considered the key decisive factor to change actual behaviour, and by that improve the functional ability of the patients. This should reduce primary health care use and reduce referrals to the more expensive treatments in secondary care. The effect of patients' beliefs on their functional outcomes has to our knowledge never been studied in a population of patients with LBP being referred from primary care to secondary care treatment.

Materials and Methods:

This is a prospective cohort study. Data is collected from a consecutive series of 800 adult patients (18+), with low back pain as the dominant musculoskeletal complaint, referred from general practices in Central Denmark Region to the Spine Centre at Silkeborg Regional Hospital. Patients will be excluded in case of spinal fractures or malignancy.

All patients seen at the Spine Centre receive a digital letter with a link to an online questionnaire to be completed approximately one week before their appointment at the Spine Centre. The questionnaire contains questions about their back pain history, present pain (Low Back Pain Rating Scale), disability (Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire), quality of life (EQ-5D), fear-avoidance questions (Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire), STarT Back Screening tool, questions on average level of physical activity, beliefs about physical activity in relation to back pain, advice received from health professionals about staying active, and questions about employment and housing situation. For those accepting participation the same questionnaire is forwarded by email 52 weeks after the initial visit at the Spine Center.

Expected outcome and perspective: This study will bring knowledge about the associations between patient's disease perceptions and beliefs about staying active despite pain and their functional improvement. Furthermore, the study will clarify to what extent patients perceive to have been given advice to stay active by a primary care health professional. Although this study does not explain why some patients do not have guideline concordant beliefs, it will help inform health care professionals in primary care about the possible potential of an increased primary care attention towards the recommendation of staying active when patients have LBP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low back pain patients

Cohort of 800 consecutive low back pain patients, 18 years +, who have been referred from general practice to the secondary sector for further examination and MR scan.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Low back pain (with or without sciatica) as the dominant musculoskeletal complaint
* 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Spinal fractures
* Malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Central Jutland Regional Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nanna Rolving, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Diagnostic Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Diagnostic Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bishop A, Foster NE, Thomas E, Hay EM. How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists. Pain. 2008 Mar;135(1-2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.11.010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18206309 (View on PubMed)

Dima A, Lewith GT, Little P, Moss-Morris R, Foster NE, Bishop FL. Identifying patients' beliefs about treatments for chronic low back pain in primary care: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jul;63(612):e490-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X669211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23834886 (View on PubMed)

Glasziou P, Haynes B. The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid Based Nurs. 2005 Apr;8(2):36-8. doi: 10.1136/ebn.8.2.36. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15830412 (View on PubMed)

Udby CL, Riis A, Thomsen JL, Rolving N. Does the use of telephone reminders to increase survey response rates affect outcome estimates? An ancillary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Oct 20;22(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04787-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34670521 (View on PubMed)

Riis A, Karran EL, Thomsen JL, Jorgensen A, Holst S, Rolving N. The association between believing staying active is beneficial and achieving a clinically relevant functional improvement after 52 weeks: a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic low back pain in secondary care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 20;21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3062-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31959168 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6300004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimize Low Back Pain
NCT03859713 UNKNOWN PHASE3