The Association Between STarT Back Tool Subgroups and Postural Stability
NCT ID: NCT03065439
Last Updated: 2019-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-02-04
2019-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Core Stability Exercises and Cognitive Tasks on Chronic Non-specific Back Pain
NCT05832918
The Effectiveness of Two Different Feedbacks in Core Stabilization Education for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
NCT03099941
Efficacy of the Lumbar Stabilization and Thoracic Mobilization Exercises in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
NCT03862898
Core Stability Exercise Versus Aerobic Exercise on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06634511
Recurrent Low Back Pain: Linking Mechanism to Outcomes (RCT)
NCT01360359
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with LBP have found to have different postural control strategies than patients without LBP especially during tasks involving increased task complexity (6-7). However, some studies have not found decreased postural control among patients whit LBP (8-9). Heterogeneous study populations may explain the discrepancy in findings especially if subgroups of patients with LBP have affected postural control while other subgroups are not affected.
Patients with pain often present with some degree of cognitive impairments which could limit the extent to which daily activities could be performed. This may be particularly present among SBT group three patients. Cognitive impairments have been associated with decreased function and consequently reduced balance in elderly, indicating that postural stability requires significant amount of cognitive resource. Since the cognitive resources are limited, if additional tasks compete for these resources, performance in one or more tasks can become affected. The conscious interpretation of (or attention towards) painful stimulations is a costly process that uses significant amount of the cognitive resources available which could impair physical performance. Consequently, this may lead to additional postural sway and thereby restricted balance.
After given written informed consent patients fill in a questionnaire including age, gender, educational level (bachelor, yes/no), employment, sick leave, co-morbidity (other than LBP, yes/no), pain duration (2-6 weeks/sub-acute or chronic), pain intensity (NPR), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (23 question, RMDQ), self-reported health status (EQ-5D visual analogue scale). After filling in the questionnaire patients will be asked to take of their jacket and shoes and to empty their pockets, before measuring height, weight, and testing for static balance.
Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®). The force plate will be placed with a distance of 100 cm to a wall in front of the patient and with more than 100 cm of free space to the sides and behind the force plate. The force plate, an equilateral triangle (800 mm), had four strain gauge transducer signals converted by a three-channel DC amplifier and transformed to digital data (50 Hz) and subsequently filtered digitally, using a three-point median filter and IRR filter, with 20 Hz cut-off frequency. On the wall in front of the patient a 12 cm circular green plate will be place in the patients' eye level. Patients will be asked to stand with their feet as closed positioned as possible, without lifting their feet, and to focus on the green plate in front of them. Patients will be asked to replicate this position for each test. The static balance test will require that the subjects stand as quiet as possible during 35 seconds in 4 different conditions in the following order: (i) eyes open and easy counting, (ii) eyes closed and easy counting, (iii) eyes closed and counting in multiples of seven, and (iv) eyes closed and counting backward from 500 in multiples of seven.
The force platform, scale, and person altimeter will be calibrated every fortnight or more frequent. Data will be extracted, checked for any abnormal discrepancies, and saved on a secure driver frequently (at least every fortnight).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
STarT Back Tool group 3
Patients scored as high risk patients by the STarT Back Tool
Static balance testing
Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®).
STarT Back Tool groups 1+2
Patients scored as low risk or medium risk patients by the STarT Back Tool
Static balance testing
Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Static balance testing
Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Blindness
* Dyslexia and not able to reply questionnaires unassisted
* Pregnancy
* Not able to walk unassisted
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aalborg University
OTHER
Aalborg University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Allan Riis
Post doc
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Allan Riis, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Research unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sofiendal fysioterapi og kiropraktik
Aalborg, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Main CJ, Sowden G, Hill JC, Watson PJ, Hay EM. Integrating physical and psychological approaches to treatment in low back pain: the development and content of the STarT Back trial's 'high-risk' intervention (StarT Back; ISRCTN 37113406). Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
Sowden G, Hill JC, Konstantinou K, Khanna M, Main CJ, Salmon P, Somerville S, Wathall S, Foster NE; IMPaCT Back study team. Targeted treatment in primary care for low back pain: the treatment system and clinical training programmes used in the IMPaCT Back study (ISRCTN 55174281). Fam Pract. 2012 Feb;29(1):50-62. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr037. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
Foster NE, Mullis R, Hill JC, Lewis M, Whitehurst DG, Doyle C, Konstantinou K, Main C, Somerville S, Sowden G, Wathall S, Young J, Hay EM; IMPaCT Back Study team. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):102-11. doi: 10.1370/afm.1625.
Mientjes MI, Frank JS. Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999 Dec;14(10):710-6. doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00025-x.
Mok NW, Brauer SG, Hodges PW. Hip strategy for balance control in quiet standing is reduced in people with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Mar 15;29(6):E107-12. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000115134.97854.c9.
Salavati M, Mazaheri M, Negahban H, Ebrahimi I, Jafari AH, Kazemnejad A, Parnianpour M. Effect of dual-tasking on postural control in subjects with nonspecific low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 1;34(13):1415-21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a3a917.
Maribo T, Schiottz-Christensen B, Jensen LD, Andersen NT, Stengaard-Pedersen K. Postural balance in low back pain patients: criterion-related validity of centre of pressure assessed on a portable force platform. Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):425-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1981-5. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AllanRiis_6
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.