Evaluation of Return to Work One Year After a Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT03936725

Last Updated: 2020-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-10

Study Completion Date

2020-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Return to work is one of the essential objectives of functional spinal restoration programs. When the duration of the work stoppage increases, the chances of returning to work become worse. No studies have yet evaluated the value of a short 2-week restoration program.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a 2-week functional restoration program regains a return-to-work rate similar to longer-term restoration programs at one year post-program.

This retrospective study with prospective referral included 200 patients with non specific chronic low-back pain who participated in a self-care rehabilitation program between May 2018 and May 2019. The program included both physical and educational approaches to dealing with the condition. The duration was two weeks with follow-up at three months.

The main evaluation criterion was to evaluate the return to work rate by telephone at one year post-program. Secondary objectives were to observe return-to-work conditions, absenteeism, recovery time, pain and physical activity at one year post-program and also to observe if there was a possible association between intrinsic/extrinsic factors and return to work

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were included in the study from May 2019 to May 2020 if they had chronic nonspecific low back pain of more than 12 weeks according to the French health authority (High Authority of Health).

The data for this study were collected after validation by the ethics committee (Institutional Review Board). Initial data were collected from generation of a list of computerized medical records of low back pain patients who participated in the program between May 2018 and May 2019 and were hospitalized in the day or week area of follow-up and rehabilitative care : age, sex, BMI, marital status, clinical elements related to the low-back pain (total duration of low back pain, history of spine surgery, last spinal imaging, pain measured on a visual analog scale, analgesic consumption, tobacco consumption, physical activity, self-exercise, physiotherapy, Schober index, finger-ground distance, poplitates angles, heel-buttock distance) and professional situation (professional status, carrying heavy loads, sick leave accumulated prior hospitalization for back pain, professional status, occupational disease, occupational accident, disability, half-time therapy).

One-year post-program data were collected by telephone after consent was received. The investigators collected the date of return to work, elements concerning the conditions of return to work (modification of the previous position, working time, type of contract, work stoppages related to back pain, evolution of global job satisfaction before/after program ) and clinical elements (change in pain after the program, physical activity, self-stretching exercises, spine operation after the program,satisfaction of the rehabilitation program, benefit provided by the program).

Reference Methodology MR-004 was applied to the study after approval by the Data Protection Officer (CNIL). An information letter was sent to the selected patients to comply with the applicable regulations (RGPD). The patient was not included if he returned the non-consent form.

Program : The duration of hospitalization was 2 weeks and the care program was delivered, for each patient, by the same medical and paramedical team including doctors, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, a nurse. There was no change in the program during the 2018-2019 year, so the hospitalized patients received the same program. The functional restoration program included stretching and muscle strengthening of the spine and sub-pelvic planes, abdominal sheathing, gymnastics, exercise re-training sessions, self-exercise training, balneotherapy, relaxation sessions, sessions of body awareness and ergonomics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non Specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chronic and non specific low back pain patients

Chronic and non specific low back pain patients

1 year phone call : data collection

Intervention Type OTHER

Included patients are contacted by telephone at 12 months after discharge. The investigators explain to the patient that this call is in the same context as a regular follow-up rehabilitation consultation and that the data collected will also be part of a study to evaluate and improve the program in which they participated. The interview will be transcribed in writing in their computerized and secure medical file. During this 20-minute telephone conversation, the patient answers a number of questions via a standardized questionnaire, in order to gather the various criteria for judgment.

If patients do not answer the first call, a phone message will be left and they will be contacted again up to 2 times. Patients who do not respond to 3 calls will be considered lost to follow-up.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

1 year phone call : data collection

Included patients are contacted by telephone at 12 months after discharge. The investigators explain to the patient that this call is in the same context as a regular follow-up rehabilitation consultation and that the data collected will also be part of a study to evaluate and improve the program in which they participated. The interview will be transcribed in writing in their computerized and secure medical file. During this 20-minute telephone conversation, the patient answers a number of questions via a standardized questionnaire, in order to gather the various criteria for judgment.

If patients do not answer the first call, a phone message will be left and they will be contacted again up to 2 times. Patients who do not respond to 3 calls will be considered lost to follow-up.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age between 18 and 65 years
* lumbalgia for more than 12 weeks labeled nonspecific (= common mechanics)
* have benefited fully from the 2-week day hospital rehabilitation program.

Exclusion Criteria

* secondary low back pain
* immediate postoperative hospitalization (\<3 months)
* patient who died at the time of the study
* non-updated telephone numbers
* housewife, students subject subject to protection (curatorship, safeguard of justice, guardianship)
* Serious co-morbidities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marie HILLION, medical intern

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU de Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uh Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL19_0166

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Chronic Low Back Pain: TOTALSPINE - UO04
NCT06895317 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA