Evaluation of Return to Work One Year After a Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT03936725
Last Updated: 2020-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-10
2020-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a 2-week functional restoration program regains a return-to-work rate similar to longer-term restoration programs at one year post-program.
This retrospective study with prospective referral included 200 patients with non specific chronic low-back pain who participated in a self-care rehabilitation program between May 2018 and May 2019. The program included both physical and educational approaches to dealing with the condition. The duration was two weeks with follow-up at three months.
The main evaluation criterion was to evaluate the return to work rate by telephone at one year post-program. Secondary objectives were to observe return-to-work conditions, absenteeism, recovery time, pain and physical activity at one year post-program and also to observe if there was a possible association between intrinsic/extrinsic factors and return to work
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of a Condensed Functional Restoration Program for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: a Study of 193 Patients
NCT03803501
Telecare Rehabilitation Program in Chronic Low Back Pain with Psychological Retention and Predominant Sociability
NCT05390762
Predictive Factors for the Success of Rehabilitation Programs in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07051772
Functional Rehabilitation Effects on Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07347457
Frequency of Correct Response and Factors Associated in the Medium Term With a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04128098
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The data for this study were collected after validation by the ethics committee (Institutional Review Board). Initial data were collected from generation of a list of computerized medical records of low back pain patients who participated in the program between May 2018 and May 2019 and were hospitalized in the day or week area of follow-up and rehabilitative care : age, sex, BMI, marital status, clinical elements related to the low-back pain (total duration of low back pain, history of spine surgery, last spinal imaging, pain measured on a visual analog scale, analgesic consumption, tobacco consumption, physical activity, self-exercise, physiotherapy, Schober index, finger-ground distance, poplitates angles, heel-buttock distance) and professional situation (professional status, carrying heavy loads, sick leave accumulated prior hospitalization for back pain, professional status, occupational disease, occupational accident, disability, half-time therapy).
One-year post-program data were collected by telephone after consent was received. The investigators collected the date of return to work, elements concerning the conditions of return to work (modification of the previous position, working time, type of contract, work stoppages related to back pain, evolution of global job satisfaction before/after program ) and clinical elements (change in pain after the program, physical activity, self-stretching exercises, spine operation after the program,satisfaction of the rehabilitation program, benefit provided by the program).
Reference Methodology MR-004 was applied to the study after approval by the Data Protection Officer (CNIL). An information letter was sent to the selected patients to comply with the applicable regulations (RGPD). The patient was not included if he returned the non-consent form.
Program : The duration of hospitalization was 2 weeks and the care program was delivered, for each patient, by the same medical and paramedical team including doctors, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, a nurse. There was no change in the program during the 2018-2019 year, so the hospitalized patients received the same program. The functional restoration program included stretching and muscle strengthening of the spine and sub-pelvic planes, abdominal sheathing, gymnastics, exercise re-training sessions, self-exercise training, balneotherapy, relaxation sessions, sessions of body awareness and ergonomics.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chronic and non specific low back pain patients
Chronic and non specific low back pain patients
1 year phone call : data collection
Included patients are contacted by telephone at 12 months after discharge. The investigators explain to the patient that this call is in the same context as a regular follow-up rehabilitation consultation and that the data collected will also be part of a study to evaluate and improve the program in which they participated. The interview will be transcribed in writing in their computerized and secure medical file. During this 20-minute telephone conversation, the patient answers a number of questions via a standardized questionnaire, in order to gather the various criteria for judgment.
If patients do not answer the first call, a phone message will be left and they will be contacted again up to 2 times. Patients who do not respond to 3 calls will be considered lost to follow-up.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1 year phone call : data collection
Included patients are contacted by telephone at 12 months after discharge. The investigators explain to the patient that this call is in the same context as a regular follow-up rehabilitation consultation and that the data collected will also be part of a study to evaluate and improve the program in which they participated. The interview will be transcribed in writing in their computerized and secure medical file. During this 20-minute telephone conversation, the patient answers a number of questions via a standardized questionnaire, in order to gather the various criteria for judgment.
If patients do not answer the first call, a phone message will be left and they will be contacted again up to 2 times. Patients who do not respond to 3 calls will be considered lost to follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* lumbalgia for more than 12 weeks labeled nonspecific (= common mechanics)
* have benefited fully from the 2-week day hospital rehabilitation program.
Exclusion Criteria
* immediate postoperative hospitalization (\<3 months)
* patient who died at the time of the study
* non-updated telephone numbers
* housewife, students subject subject to protection (curatorship, safeguard of justice, guardianship)
* Serious co-morbidities
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie HILLION, medical intern
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU de Montpellier
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uh Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL19_0166
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.