Validation of the French Version RTWSE (Return To Work Self Efficacy Scale)
NCT ID: NCT03088969
Last Updated: 2019-11-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-04-30
2018-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The evaluation of the self-efficiency perceived of return in the work of the patients by a validated auto-questionnaire is thus an additional objective parameter determining the risk factors of unfavorable evolution of the patients with Low Back Pain. This parameter also allows highlight other levers of actions in the therapeutic education.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Return to Work One Year After a Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Back Pain
NCT03936725
An Educational and Exercise Program as Secondary Prevention of Recurrent Lower Back Pain in Healthcare Workers
NCT00782925
Telecare Rehabilitation Program in Chronic Low Back Pain with Psychological Retention and Predominant Sociability
NCT05390762
The Examination of Relationship Between Self-Efficacy in People With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05614674
Validation of the French Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04931758
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The second stage: the RTWSE is given to the patients with a Chronic Back Pain in the program of functional restoration of the rachis. Questionnaire FABQ, BARBECUE and Quebec are also given to the patient to obtain the status "faith" and the "functional" status. The questionnaire JDI as well as the analog visual scale is given to estimate the global professional satisfaction. The pain is estimated by a digital scale. The score IPAQ allows to estimate the level of physical activity of the patients. The HAD allows to estimate the level of anxiety and depression of the patients.
The additional questionnaires used for several reasons: in routine for the evaluation of the patients with a Chronic Back Pain; to characterize the patients and within the framework of the study for the validity of convergence and difference of questionnaires RTWSE 10 and 19 items.
The third stage: the questionnaire RTWSE is given again to the patient at 72 hours interval while the state of the patient is considered as stable.
The fourth stage: the questionnaires are given at J21 and in 2 months apart for the study of the sensibility in the change with the FABQ, BARBECUE, Quebec and the IPAQ.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient with a chronic back pain
questionnaire RTWSE
The evaluation of the self-efficiency perceived of return in the work of the patients by a validated auto-questionnaire is thus an additional objective parameter determining the risk factors of unfavorable evolution of the patients with Low Back Pain. This parameter also allows highlight other levers of actions in the therapeutic education.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
questionnaire RTWSE
The evaluation of the self-efficiency perceived of return in the work of the patients by a validated auto-questionnaire is thus an additional objective parameter determining the risk factors of unfavorable evolution of the patients with Low Back Pain. This parameter also allows highlight other levers of actions in the therapeutic education.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult (\>18 years old)
* Chronic Low Back Pain evolving for at least 3 months
* Acceptance to participate in the study
* Patients affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary entitled)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient in the incapacity to answer the questionnaire.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emmanuel COUDEYRE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rossignol M, Rozenberg S, Leclerc A. Epidemiology of low back pain: what's new? Joint Bone Spine. 2009 Dec;76(6):608-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.07.003. No abstract available.
Gourmelen J, Chastang JF, Ozguler A, Lanoe JL, Ravaud JF, Leclerc A. Frequency of low back pain among men and women aged 30 to 64 years in France. Results of two national surveys. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2007 Nov;50(8):640-4, 633-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jun 27. English, French.
Ozguler A, Leclerc A, Landre MF, Pietri-Taleb F, Niedhammer I. Individual and occupational determinants of low back pain according to various definitions of low back pain. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Mar;54(3):215-20. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.3.215.
Brouwer S, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Lee H, Krause N, Shaw WS. Return-to-work self-efficacy: development and validation of a scale in claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Jun;21(2):244-58. doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9262-4.
Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang YH, Pransky G. 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire--psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011 Mar;37(2):109-19. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3139. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHU-309
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.