Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE2
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-29
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Movantik for Opioid-Related Esophageal Disorders
NCT02998606
Evaluation of Single Doses of GSK962040 in Critically Ill Patients With Enteral Feed Intolerance
NCT01039805
A Study to Evaluate Safety, Side Effects, Muscle Activity and Speed of Gastric Emptying of GSK962040
NCT00562848
Aprepitant for the Relief of Nausea in Patients With Chronic Nausea and Vomiting of Presumed Gastric Origin Trial
NCT01149369
Effects of Methylnaltrexone in Comparison to Naloxone on Loperamide-induced Delay of the Oro-cecal, Whole-gut and Colon Transit Time.
NCT01596764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data suggests a relationship between opioid use and decreased gastric motility. Literature suggests that peripherally acting opioid agonist may provide relief in the instance of GI dysfunction (Holzer 2007). Movantik (Naloxegol) is an opioid agonist specifically designed to work outside of the central nervous system. Movantik (Naloxegol) can alleviate the adverse effects associated in chronic pain patients on opioid treatment - reduction of the undesired peripheral effects of opioids without disrupting analgesic effects. The use of Movantik (Naloxegol) has the potential to improve gastric dysmotility while preserving pain relief of the opioid analgesic.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of naloxegol in opioid-related gastroparesis. This will be a randomized, double-blind study comparing Movantik 25 mg to placebo. The dose of Movantik is the dose that is currently FDA approved for opioid-induced constipation. The four-week study period is the duration of the phase 2b studies for Movantik for opioid-induced constipation in which the response rates were 60% and 35% with active treatment and placebo (Chey 2015).
The investigators have included a unique aspect of this study to better balance the benefits for patients participating in this randomized double-blind study in which half the patients receive a placebo agent. All patients in the treatment group and the placebo group will be invited to participate in the 4-week open-label extension for this study. This also serves to study the duration of the potential favorable effects of Movantik (Naloxegol) in this patient population as well as offering an extended time period to assess safety and tolerability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study Group
Naloxegol 25 mg, oral tablet, daily for 4 weeks
Naloxegol 25 MG Oral Tablet [Movantik]
Patients will be given the study drug (Movantik 25 mg).They will take this daily in the morning 1 hour before breakfast for four weeks.
Placebo Control
Placebo Oral Tablet, 25 mg, oral tablet, daily for 4 weeks
Placebo Oral Tablet
Patients will be given Placebo (Placebo 25 mg).They will take this daily in the morning 1 hour before breakfast for four weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Naloxegol 25 MG Oral Tablet [Movantik]
Patients will be given the study drug (Movantik 25 mg).They will take this daily in the morning 1 hour before breakfast for four weeks.
Placebo Oral Tablet
Patients will be given Placebo (Placebo 25 mg).They will take this daily in the morning 1 hour before breakfast for four weeks.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Daily use of narcotic analgesics for treatment of pain. Patients need to be on a stable daily dose of opiates for the last 4 weeks prior to enrollment
3. Patients with symptoms of gastroparesis with GCSI score (from the PAGI-SYM) of \>2.0. These symptoms of gastroparesis must be present after starting opioid treatment.
4. Delayed gastric emptying based on previous scintigraphy (Percent gastric retention \>60% at 2 hours and/or \>10% retention at 4 hours
5. Signing informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of severe renal impairment (CrCl\<60 ml/min)
3. Presence of severe hepatic impairment - Child-Pugh Classification Class C, generally AST\>200 or ALT\>200 or Total bilirubin \>3.0.
4. Other conditions besides gastroparesis that could potentially slow gastric emptying, such as untreated hypothyroidism.
5. Concomitants use of strong CYP 3A4 inhibitors (such as ketoconazole, diltiazem, erythromycin, clarithromycin), use of CYP3A4 inducer.
6. Use of NSAIDs and/or Plavix/Clopidogrel
7. Any prior use of Movantik (the study drug) or other opioid receptor antagonist (e.g., Relistor (methylnaltrexone), naltrexone, or naloxone) before the screening visit.
8. Patients with known cancer or cancer history within last 5 years prior to the screening visit.
9. Patients with GI obstruction and/or perforation or conditions with potential for GI perforation.
10. Patients with disruption to the blood-brain barrier;
11. Current use of a medication affecting gastric motility such as metoclopramide, domperidone, and erythromycin;
12. Pregnant women, females planning to become pregnant, and nursing mothers.
13. Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use contraceptives throughout the course of treatment
14. Subjects with severe co-morbidities (Cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, hematologic, endocrine, neurologic) based on PI's clinical judgment.
15. Active substance abuse.
16. History of major comorbid psychiatric conditions including mania and schizophrenia or severe current depression
17. At-risk populations, including prisoners and mentally challenged. Any condition or the patient is in a situation which may put him/her at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study (e.g., difficulty hearing, cognitive impairment)
18. Patients in which Movantik is clinically inadvisable
19. Subject unable to consent or is unwilling to provide informed consent
18 Years
84 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
Temple University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henry Parkman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Temple University Hospita
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Fisher RS; American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1592-622. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.055.
Abell TL, Bernstein RK, Cutts T, Farrugia G, Forster J, Hasler WL, McCallum RW, Olden KW, Parkman HP, Parrish CR, Pasricha PJ, Prather CM, Soffer EE, Twillman R, Vinik AI. Treatment of gastroparesis: a multidisciplinary clinical review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006 Apr;18(4):263-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00760.x.
Parkman HP, Yates K, Hasler WL, Nguyen L, Pasricha PJ, Snape WJ, Farrugia G, Koch KL, Calles J, Abell TL, McCallum RW, Lee L, Unalp-Arida A, Tonascia J, Hamilton F; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium. Similarities and differences between diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Dec;9(12):1056-64; quiz e133-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
Anantharamu T, Sharma S, Gupta AK, Dahiya N, Singh Brashier DB, Sharma AK. Naloxegol: First oral peripherally acting mu opioid receptor antagonists for opioid-induced constipation. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):188-92. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.162015.
Chey WD, Webster L, Sostek M, Lappalainen J, Barker PN, Tack J. Naloxegol for opioid-induced constipation in patients with noncancer pain. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2387-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310246. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D, Kahrilas P, Stanghellini V, Talley NJ, Tack J. Development and validation of a patient-assessed gastroparesis symptom severity measure: the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jul 1;18(1):141-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01612.x.
Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Tack J, Stanghellini V, Talley NJ, Kahrilas P, De La Loge C, Trudeau E, Dubois D. Responsiveness and interpretation of a symptom severity index specific to upper gastrointestinal disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Sep;2(9):769-77. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00348-9.
Revicki DA, Camilleri M, Kuo B, Norton NJ, Murray L, Palsgrove A, Parkman HP. Development and content validity of a gastroparesis cardinal symptom index daily diary. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep 15;30(6):670-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04078.x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, Hasler WL, Lin HC, Maurer AH, McCallum RW, Nowak T, Nusynowitz ML, Parkman HP, Shreve P, Szarka LA, Snape WJ Jr, Ziessman HA; American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008 Mar;36(1):44-54. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.107.048116. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
Maranki JL, Lytes V, Meilahn JE, Harbison S, Friedenberg FK, Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Predictive factors for clinical improvement with Enterra gastric electric stimulation treatment for refractory gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Aug;53(8):2072-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0124-7. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
Szarka LA, Camilleri M, Vella A, Burton D, Baxter K, Simonson J, Zinsmeister AR. A stable isotope breath test with a standard meal for abnormal gastric emptying of solids in the clinic and in research. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jun;6(6):635-643.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.
Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987 Aug;30(2):191-197. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.
Culpepper-Morgan JA, Inturrisi CE, Portenoy RK, Foley K, Houde RW, Marsh F, Kreek MJ. Treatment of opioid-induced constipation with oral naloxone: a pilot study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Jul;52(1):90-5. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1992.106.
Wesson DR, Ling W. The Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003 Apr-Jun;35(2):253-9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2003.10400007.
Peachey JE, Lei H. Assessment of opioid dependence with naloxone. Br J Addict. 1988 Feb;83(2):193-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1988.tb03981.x. No abstract available.
Tompkins DA, Bigelow GE, Harrison JA, Johnson RE, Fudala PJ, Strain EC. Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Nov 1;105(1-2):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):5-25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24102
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.