Broadening Antiemetics Research by Comparing the Effectiveness of Fosaprepitant and Metoclopramide
NCT ID: NCT06740812
Last Updated: 2025-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE4
212 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-05-31
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Antiemetic Fosaprepitant To Remedy Nausea and Vomiting
NCT06382012
The Montefiore Metoclopramide Study
NCT00475306
A Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of MK-0517 in Healthy Subjects (MK-0517-012)
NCT00990821
Comparison of Ondansetron, Metoclopramide and Promethazine for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Adult ED
NCT00655642
The Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination in Comparison With the Other Antiemetics
NCT06390787
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Antiemetics are used to treat NV. Antiemetics currently utilized in the emergency department setting for NV do not always work on the first dose and have a plethora of side effects because of their peripheral mechanism of action outside of the vomiting reflex pathway in the central nervous system. These medications include ondansetron, promethazine, metoclopramide, olanzapine, haloperidol. Chief among these side effects is alteration of an aspect cardiac electrical signaling called the QT segment which represents the duration of ventricular contraction and relaxation. The QT segment is prolonged with commonly used antiemetics which can often be a prelude to cardiac dysrhythmias that are associated with mortality. As a result, patients with NV often have long length-of-stay (LOS) involving supportive care with intravenous fluids or empiric treatment with medications that can potentiate development of cardiac dysrhythmias. This is a problem in busy emergency departments (EDs) struggling to accelerate patient throughput in order to appropriately keep up with patient volume in an under-supplied hospital bed environment nationally.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Investigational Intervention
Fosaprepitant
Fosaprepitant for Injection
Fosaprepitant 150mg IV administered over 15 minutes
Standard-of-Care Intervention
Metoclopramide
Metoclopramide Injection
Metoclopramide 10mg IV administered over 15 minutes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fosaprepitant for Injection
Fosaprepitant 150mg IV administered over 15 minutes
Metoclopramide Injection
Metoclopramide 10mg IV administered over 15 minutes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Present to ED for treatment of Nausea and/or vomiting as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) or identified by treating clinician
Exclusion Criteria
* Antiemetic use or intravenous fluids prior to presenting to ED for evaluation and management
* Bradycardia (\< 60 bpm heart rate)
* Prolonged QTc (greater than 490ms)
* Not conversant in English or Spanish
* Altered mental status
* Dementia
* Lack of phone for follow-up communication
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Montefiore Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Benjamin Friedman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Montefiore Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mechanisms and Control of Emesis: A Satellite Symposium of the European Neuroscience Association: Proceedings of an International Meeting Held in Marseille (France), 4-7 September 1992. John Libbey Eurotext
Singh P, Yoon SS, Kuo B. Nausea: a review of pathophysiology and therapeutics. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;9(1):98-112. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15618131.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006 Feb-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK52651/
Pourmand A, Mazer-Amirshahi M, Chistov S, Sabha Y, Vukomanovic D, Almulhim M. Emergency department approach to QTc prolongation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;35(12):1928-1933. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
Franklin BJ, Vakili S, Huckman RS, Hosein S, Falk N, Cheng K, Murray M, Harris S, Morris CA, Goralnick E. The Inpatient Discharge Lounge as a Potential Mechanism to Mitigate Emergency Department Boarding and Crowding. Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;75(6):704-714. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.12.002. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Aapro M, Carides A, Rapoport BL, Schmoll HJ, Zhang L, Warr D. Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety. Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):450-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0229. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
Langford P, Chrisp P. Fosaprepitant and aprepitant: an update of the evidence for their place in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Core Evid. 2010 Oct 21;5:77-90. doi: 10.2147/ce.s6012.
Furyk JS, Meek RA, Egerton-Warburton D. Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 28;2015(9):CD010106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010106.pub2.
Yang Y, Yang N, Wu L, Ouyang Q, Fang J, Li J, Liao W, Cai K, Huang J, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhao Q, Hu X, Li W, Zhong W, Zhong D, Cheng G, Ye S, Zhong M, Wang D, Liu H, Zheng J, Liu X, Xu H, Zhang L. Safety and efficacy of aprepitant as mono and combination therapy for the prevention of emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: post-marketing surveillance in China. Chin Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;9(5):68. doi: 10.21037/cco-20-160.
Braude D, Soliz T, Crandall C, Hendey G, Andrews J, Weichenthal L. Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;24(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.08.017.
Cham S, Basire M, Kelly AM. Intermediate dose metoclopramide is not more effective than standard dose metoclopramide for patients who present to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting: a pilot study. Emerg Med Australas. 2004 Jun;16(3):208-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2004.00588.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-16422
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.