The Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination in Comparison With the Other Antiemetics

NCT ID: NCT06390787

Last Updated: 2024-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-30

Study Completion Date

2024-04-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigates the effectiveness of combining vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to standard antiemetic treatments for managing nausea and vomiting. Through a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients with diverse causes of nausea and vomiting, we aim to evaluate the frequency, severity, and tolerability of the B6 and metoclopramide combination. By elucidating its comparative efficacy against established antiemetics, this research seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in selecting optimal treatment regimens tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately enhancing the management of nausea and vomiting across various medical conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Title: Investigating the Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Versus Alternative Antiemetics: A Clinical Trial Proposal

Introduction:

Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms across various medical conditions and can significantly impact patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. While several antiemetic medications exist, finding the most effective regimen remains a clinical challenge. This proposal aims to investigate the efficacy of a combination therapy comprising vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to other antiemetics in managing nausea and vomiting.

Rationale:

Both vitamin B6 and metoclopramide have shown antiemetic properties through different mechanisms of action. However, the comparative efficacy of this combination therapy against other standard antiemetics remains largely unexplored. Understanding the relative effectiveness of this combination could provide valuable insights into optimizing antiemetic strategies, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other related conditions.

Objectives:

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy compared to alternative antiemetic regimens in reducing the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting episodes in adult patients. Additionally, the study seeks to assess the safety profile and tolerability of the combination therapy.

Conclusion:

By elucidating the comparative efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy, this study endeavors to contribute to evidence-based decision-making in the management of nausea and vomiting. The findings could potentially guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate antiemetic regimen tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vomiting

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Metoclopramide Group

This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Metoclopramide only for vomiting.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metoclopramide

Intervention Type DRUG

We gave only Metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Zofran Group

This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Zofran only for vomiting.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ondansetron

Intervention Type DRUG

We gave only Zofran as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

B6 and Metoclopramide Group

This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given B6 and Metoclopramide combination for vomiting.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Metoclopramide and Vitamin B6

Intervention Type DRUG

We gave a combination of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Control Group

This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given nothing for vomiting.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Vitamin B6 Group

This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Vitamin B6 only for vomiting.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitamin B6

Intervention Type DRUG

We gave only vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Metoclopramide and Vitamin B6

We gave a combination of vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Intervention Type DRUG

Vitamin B6

We gave only vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ondansetron

We gave only Zofran as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Intervention Type DRUG

Metoclopramide

We gave only Metoclopramide as a treatment for managing nausea and vomiting.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vitamin B6 and Metoclopramide combination Pyridoxine Zofran Plasil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any patients with vomiting

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients vitally unstable
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Baghdad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hashim Talib Hashim

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hashim Talib T Hashim, MBChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Al-Nassiryah Teaching Hospital

Nasiriyah, Thi Qar, Iraq

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iraq

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Montefiore Metoclopramide Study
NCT00475306 COMPLETED PHASE4