Comparison of Aprepitant Versus Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT ID: NCT00717054
Last Updated: 2014-05-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-02-29
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Oral Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT00659737
2 Doses of an Approved Drug Being Studied for a New Indication for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (0869-091)
NCT00090246
Aprepitant Versus Ondansetron in Preoperative Triple-therapy Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting
NCT01474915
2 Doses of an Approved Drug Being Studied for a New Indication for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (0869-090)(COMPLETED)
NCT00090155
Efficacy and Safety Study of Aprepitant Injection for Prevention of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT06543966
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Scopolamine antagonizes muscarinic type 1 (M1) and histamine type 1 (H1) receptors in the CNS, hypothalamus, and vomiting center. The noradrenergic system is also suppressed resulting in a diminished response to vestibular stimulation. Surgical procedures, opioids, and movement postoperatively all stimulate the vestibular system making scopolamine effective prophylaxis for PONV.
In adults undergoing general anesthesia with inhalational anesthetic agents, predictive risk factors for PONV include female sex, history of PONV or motion sickness, nonsmoking status, and the use of postoperative opioids. The frequency of PONV is 10% with zero, 21% with one, 39% with two, 61% with three, and 79% with 4 risk factors. The type of surgery also plays a major role. High risk procedures include intrabdominal, laparoscopic, orthopedic, major gynecologic, thyroid, otolaryngological, neurosurgical, breast, and plastic surgery.
Improving PONV prophylaxis would have a profound impact on patient care. Decreasing the incidence of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue medication, prolonged PACU time, and unplanned admissions is beneficial. Recent evidence suggests multiple drug therapy is superior to single agents. The correct preoperative treatment medication is instrumental in the outcome. This study compares the incidence of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue medication, prolonged PACU time, and unplanned hospital admission in patients with high risk for PONV treated with oral aprepitant with or without transdermal scopolamine preoperatively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Aprepitant and Scopolamine group
Patients receive aprepitant and scopolamine for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting then were followed through the post operative period looking for nausea, vomiting, composite, and rescue medication utilization. This was compared to patients receiving aprepitant and scopolamine placebo looking for a difference in incidence of events.
Aprepitant
Aprepitant 40mg PO one time at least one hour prior to induction of anesthesia
Scopolamine
Scopolamine transdermal applied to skin behind the ear one hour prior to surgery
Aprepitant and Scopolamine Placebo Group
Patients receiving aprepitant and placebo scopolamine for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting then followed through the post operative period looking for signs of nausea, vomiting, composite, and rescue medication utilization. This was compared to patients receiving aprepitant and scopolamine looking for a difference in incidence of events.
Scopolamine
Scopolamine transdermal applied to skin behind the ear one hour prior to surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Aprepitant
Aprepitant 40mg PO one time at least one hour prior to induction of anesthesia
Scopolamine
Scopolamine transdermal applied to skin behind the ear one hour prior to surgery
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1-3
* If on oral contraceptive, must be willing to use back up method for 1 month
* Must have 2 risk factors for PONV
Exclusion Criteria
* Procedure less than 1 hour
* Pregnant or breast feeding
* Antiemetic medication in previous 24 hours
* Narrow-angle glaucoma
* Allergic to belladonna alkaloids
* Hypersensitive to barbiturates
* Prostate hypertrophy
* Severe hepatic disease
* On chemotherapy taking aprepitant
* Fever
* Sepsis
* Taking any of the following medications: Orap, Seldane, Hismanal, Propulsid, Phenytoin, Phenothiazines, Tricyclic antidepressants, Meperidine, Tolbutamide, Aluminum and Magnesium containing Antacids, Anti-cholinergics, Coumadin
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Drexel University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael S Green, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Drexel University College of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00659737
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.