Higher or Lower Dose Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Medically Less Fit Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myeloid Neoplasm
NCT ID: NCT03012672
Last Updated: 2022-03-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-30
2021-02-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Filgrastim, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
NCT02044796
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
NCT00002805
Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Adults With Previously Untreated Leukemia or Lymphoma
NCT00002766
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00274807
Azacitidine, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01839240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To evaluate the feasibility of randomizing medically less fit adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or analogous myeloid neoplasms to either intensive or non-intensive induction and post remission chemotherapy.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the attitude of patients and physicians toward randomization and explore reasons for treatment preference.
II. To evaluate whether the ability to assess fitness for intensive chemotherapy can be improved by an augmented treatment-related mortality (TRM) score that includes additional (co-morbidity) factors, and to compare the ability of physicians and the prediction algorithm(s) to assess the likelihood of early death.
III. To compare, within the limits of a pilot study, response, duration of response, and survival between patients receiving intensive and those receiving non-intensive chemotherapy.
IV. To describe the impact of treatment intensity on quality of life of patients undergoing chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML.
V. To describe the impact of treatment intensity on medical resource utilization and care cost of patients undergoing chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML.
OUTLINE: Patients agreeable to randomization are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Patients not agreeable to randomization receive treatment based on their preference.
ARM I (HIGHER-DOSE):
INDUCTION: Patients receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) on days 0-5, higher dose cladribine intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days 1-5, higher dose cytarabine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, and higher dose mitoxantrone IV over 60 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) with up to 2 courses of Induction receive G-CSF, cladribine, and cytarabine as in Induction. Courses repeat every 6 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II (LOWER-DOSE):
INDUCTION: Patients receive G-CSF SC on days 0-5, lower dose cladribine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, lower dose cytarabine IV over 1 hour on days 1-5, and lower dose mitoxantrone IV over 60 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) with up to 6 courses of Induction receive G-CSF, cladribine, and cytarabine as in Induction. Courses repeat every 6 weeks for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 5 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (higher-dose)
INDUCTION: Patients receive G-CSF SC on days 0-5, higher dose cladribine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, higher dose cytarabine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, and higher dose mitoxantrone IV over 60 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve CR/CRi with up to 2 courses of Induction receive G-CSF, cladribine, and cytarabine as in Induction. Courses repeat every 6 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Cladribine
Given IV
Cytarabine
Given IV
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Given SC
Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride
Given IV
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Arm II (lower-dose)
INDUCTION: Patients receive G-CSF SC on days 0-5, lower dose cladribine IV over 2 hours on days 1-5, lower dose cytarabine IV over 1 hour on days 1-5, and lower dose mitoxantrone IV over 60 minutes on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 6 weeks for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve CR/CRi with up to 6 courses of Induction receive G-CSF, cladribine, and cytarabine as in Induction. Courses repeat every 6 weeks for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Cladribine
Given IV
Cytarabine
Given IV
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Given SC
Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride
Given IV
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cladribine
Given IV
Cytarabine
Given IV
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
Given SC
Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride
Given IV
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Treatment-related mortality (TRM) score \>= 13.1 as calculated with simplified model
* The use of hydroxyurea before enrollment is permitted; hydroxyurea should be discontinued prior to start of study treatment. Patients with symptoms/signs of leukostasis, white blood cell (WBC) \> 100,000/uL, or acute symptoms felt related to their high-grade myeloid neoplasm can be treated with leukapheresis or may receive up to 1 dose of cytarabine (up to 500 mg/m\^2) anytime prior to study day 1
* Patients may have received treatment (e.g. azacitidine/decitabine, lenalidomide, growth factors) for antecedent low-grade myeloid neoplasm
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>= 45%, assessed within 3 months prior to registration, e.g. by multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiography, or other appropriate diagnostic modality
* Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception beginning at the signing of the consent until at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant illness associated with a likely survival of \< 1 year
* Active systemic fungal, bacterial, viral, or other infection, unless disease is under treatment with anti-microbials and/or controlled or stable; patients with fever thought to be likely secondary to leukemia are eligible; known hypersensitivity to any study drug
* Known hypersensitivity to any study drug used in this trial
* Pregnancy or lactation
* Concurrent treatment with any other anti-leukemia agent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Halpern
Assistant Professor, Division of Hematology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna Halpern
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2016-02051
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9759
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RG9217016
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9759
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.