Comparison of Two Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Adults With Previously Untreated Leukemia or Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT00002766

Last Updated: 2016-02-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1996-03-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which regimen of combination chemotherapy is more effective for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, or chronic myelogenous leukemia.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different chemotherapy regimens and comparing them to see how well they work in treating adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, lymphoblastic lymphoma, or chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the incidence of complete remission (CR) following induction with the ALL-2 regimen (cytarabine and high-dose mitoxantrone) vs the L-20 regimen (vincristine and prednisone) in previously untreated adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), lymphoblastic lymphoma, and lymphoid blast crisis chronic myelogenous leukemia.
* Compare the time to CR, length of hospital stay, efficacy of treatment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, and the proportion of patients achieving durable (greater than 5 years) remission in each treatment regimen.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating institution and antecedent lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms.

Arm I:

* Patients receive induction therapy consisting of cytarabine IV over 3 hours on days 1-5 with high-dose mitoxantrone IV on day 3 and methotrexate intrathecally on days 2 and 4. Patients receive sargramostim (GM-CSF) subcutaneously or IV over 4 hours beginning on day 7 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* At 7-14 days following induction therapy, patients receive consolidation therapy consisting of vincristine IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, oral prednisone 2-3 times daily on days 1-30 and methotrexate intrathecally on days 8, 15, 22, and 29.
* At 2-3 weeks following the last dose of vincristine, patients receive an additional course of consolidation therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide IV on day 1 and GM-CSF subcutaneously beginning on day 3 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* At 3-4 weeks following the second consolidation course, patients receive a third course of consolidation therapy consisting of cytarabine IV bolus on day 1 followed by continuous infusion cytarabine on days 1-4 with etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-3 and methotrexate intrathecally on days 2 and 4. Patients receive GM-CSF subcutaneously beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* Following recovery from the third consolidation course, patients receive a fourth consolidation course consisting of pegaspargase IV or intramuscularly (IM) on day 1.
* Following recovery from consolidation therapy patients receive 2 sequences of maintenance therapy with sequence one consisting of vincristine IV on days 1 and 8, oral prednisone 2-3 times daily on days 1-8, doxorubicin IV on day 15, oral mercaptopurine 2-3 times daily on days 36-64, oral methotrexate on days 39, 46, 53, and 60, dactinomycin IV on day 85, and methotrexate intrathecally on days 36 and 43.
* At 2 weeks following sequence one of maintenance therapy, patients receive sequence two consisting of the same regimen as in the first sequence with the addition of cyclophosphamide IV and carmustine IV on day 15.
* Patients with CNS involvement receive whole brain radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy regimens.

Arm II:

* Patients receive induction therapy consisting of vincristine IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, oral prednisone 2-3 times daily on days 1-29, cyclophosphamide IV on day 5, doxorubicin IV on days 23-25 and 42, methotrexate intrathecally on days 3, 5, 13, 16, 32, and 34 and GM-CSF subcutaneously or IV over 4 hours beginning from days 7 and 27 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* At approximately 3 weeks following induction therapy, patients receive consolidation therapy consisting of cytarabine IV bolus on day 1 followed by continuous infusion cytarabine on days 1-5, with daunorubicin IV on days 1-3 and methotrexate intrathecally on days 2 and 4. Patients receive GM-CSF subcutaneously beginning on day 7 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* At 6-8 weeks following the first course of consolidation therapy, patients receive a second consolidation course consisting of cytarabine IV bolus on day 1 followed by continuous infusion cytarabine on days 1-4 with methotrexate IV on days 1-4 and methotrexate intrathecally on days 2 and 4. Patients receive GM-CSF subcutaneously beginning on day 6 and continuing until blood counts recover.
* At 6-8 weeks following the second course of consolidation therapy, patients receive a third consolidation course consisting of pegaspargase IV or IM on day 1.
* At 3-4 weeks following the third course of consolidation therapy, patients receive a fourth consolidation course consisting of cyclophosphamide IV on day 1.
* At 3 weeks following the completion of consolidation therapy, patients receive the same maintenance regimen as in Arm I.

Treatment continues in patients achieving complete response. Patients in both arms receive alternating sequences of maintenance therapy over 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ARA-C/High-Dose Mitoxantrone("All-2")

See detail description

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

dactinomycin

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

sargramostim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

carmustine

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Standard Vincristine/Prednisone ("L-20")

See detail description

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

sargramostim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

carmustine

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dactinomycin

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

sargramostim

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

carmustine

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Lymphoblastic lymphoma
* Chronic myelogenous leukemia in lymphoid blast crisis

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

* 18 and over

Performance status:

* Karnofsky 20-100%

Life expectancy:

* Not specified

Hematopoietic:

* Not specified

Hepatic:

* Bilirubin no greater than 2.0 mg/dL
* Glucocorticoids for higher bilirubin allowed prior to entry, at principal investigator's discretion

Renal:

* Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL
* Glucocorticoids or renal radiotherapy for higher creatinine allowed prior to entry, at principal investigator's discretion

Cardiovascular:

* Left ventricular ejection fraction at least 50%

Other:

* Not pregnant

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

* No prior biologic therapy

Chemotherapy

* No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

* No prior endocrine therapy

Radiotherapy

* No prior radiotherapy

Surgery

* No prior surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicole Lamanna, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford Cancer Center at Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Medical College

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P30CA008748

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

MSKCC-96015A1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCI-V96-0881

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

96-015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.