Comparison of Different Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00005945

Last Updated: 2016-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

3054 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-06-30

Study Completion Date

2008-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work in treating children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

OBJECTIVES:

* Compare the event-free survival and overall survival of children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with escalating-dose IV methotrexate without leucovorin calcium versus oral methotrexate during the interim maintenance phase of therapy.
* Compare the event-free survival and overall survival of these patients after receiving treatment in two delayed intensification phases versus one delayed intensification phase.
* Compare the toxic effects of oral versus escalating-dose intravenous methotrexate in these patients.
* Determine the prognostic significance of the rate of disappearance of peripheral lymphoblasts and lymphocytes during the first week of treatment in these patients.
* Determine the prognostic significance of trisomies of chromosomes 4, 5, 10, and 17 and early treatment response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the prognostic significance of the TEL-AML1 fusion transcript and early treatment response in patients treated with these regimens.
* Determine the minimal residual disease (MRD) by polymerase chain reaction in bone marrow and cerebrospinal fluid at various stages of therapy in these patients.
* Determine the prognostic significance of MRD during various stages of therapy in these patients.
* Determine whether a second delayed intensification therapy improves the prognosis of patients who have MRD at the end of induction therapy.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis, achieving a specified early marrow response profile and M1 marrow status of less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow (regardless of the proportion of mature lymphocytes) by day 28 of induction therapy, and remaining event free with favorable bone marrow status and cytogenetics between day 21 and 28 of consolidation therapy are randomized to one of four treatment arms. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis are assigned to treatment arm II and undergo cranial irradiation. Patients with any of the following unfavorable bone marrow features and/or unfavorable cytogenetic features are assigned to the augmented treatment regimen by day 21 of induction chemotherapy or at the beginning of consolidation chemotherapy:

NOTE: All T-cell precursor patients that are not more than 4 months past completion of the delayed intensification phase of therapy should be switched to the augmented regimen as of 3/8/2004. These patients may be switched to the augmented regimen. The protocol gives specific instructions according to the phase of therapy the patients are actually in.

* Unfavorable marrow status:

* M2: 5-25% blasts in bone marrow at day 28 of induction chemotherapy (or at day 14 of induction chemotherapy if day 7 status is M3) OR
* M3: More than 25% blast cell in bone marrow, regardless of the proportion of mature lymphocytes at day 14 of induction chemotherapy
* Unfavorable cytogenetics: Must have 1 of the following:

* t(9;22)(q34;q11)
* t(4;11)(q21;q23)
* Balanced t(1;19)(q23;p13)
* Hypodiploidy with less than 45 chromosomes
* Other 11q23 translocations involving MLL Patients receive standard induction chemotherapy comprising cytarabine (ARA-C) intrathecally (IT) on day 0 or up to 72 hours before day 0; oral dexamethasone (DM) twice daily on days 0-27; vincristine (VCR) IV on days 0, 7, 14, and 21; and pegaspargase (PEG-ASP) intramuscularly (IM) once between days 3-5. Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis receive methotrexate (MTX) IT on days 7 and 28. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on days 7, 14, 21, and 28.

Patients who have achieved M1 marrow status by day 28 of induction therapy and have favorable early bone marrow response and cytogenetics proceed to standard consolidation therapy once blood counts have recovered. Patients with M3 bone marrow status at day 28 of induction therapy are taken off the protocol. All other patients are assigned to the augmented treatment regimen.

Beginning on day 28 of induction chemotherapy, patients receive standard consolidation chemotherapy comprising VCR IV on day 0 and oral mercaptopurine (MP) on days 0-27. Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on day 7 and cranial irradiation 5 days a week for 2 weeks. Patients with testicular disease receive bilateral testicular radiotherapy 5 days a week for 1 week and then for 3 consecutive days during the next week.

NOTE: As of 3/8/2004, patients with T-cell disease who did not achieve M1 marrow status by day 14 of induction OR who did not receive augmented induction and/or consolidation (regardless of early marrow status) receive cranial irradiation.

* Arm I: Beginning on day 28 of consolidation chemotherapy, patients receive interim maintenance I chemotherapy comprising oral DM twice daily on days 0-4 and 28-32; VCR IV on days 0 and 28; oral MTX on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49; oral MP on days 0-49; and MTX IT on day 28.

Beginning on day 56 of interim maintenance I chemotherapy, patients receive delayed intensification chemotherapy comprising oral DM twice daily on days 0-6 and 14-20; VCR IV and doxorubicin (DOX) IV over 15 minutes to 2 hours on days 0, 7, and 14; PEG-ASP IM on day 3; cyclophosphamide (CTX) IV over 20-30 minutes on day 28; oral thioguanine (TG) on days 28-41; ARA-C IV or subcutaneously (SC) daily on days 28-31 and 35-38; and MTX IT on days 0 and 28.

Beginning on day 56 of delayed intensification chemotherapy, patients receive interim maintenance II chemotherapy identical to interim maintenance I chemotherapy except patients receive MTX IT on days 0 and 28.

Beginning on day 56 of interim maintenance II chemotherapy, patients receive maintenance chemotherapy comprising oral DM twice daily on days 0-4, 28-32, and 56-60; VCR IV on days 0, 28, and 56; oral MP on days 0-83; oral MTX on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, and 77; and MTX IT on day 0.

* Arm II: Patients receive interim maintenance I chemotherapy, delayed intensification chemotherapy, and interim maintenance II chemotherapy as in arm I. Beginning on day 56 of interim maintenance II chemotherapy, patients then receive a second course of delayed intensification chemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy as in arm I.
* Arm III: Beginning on day 28 of consolidation chemotherapy, patients receive interim maintenance I chemotherapy comprising VCR IV; escalating doses of MTX IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40; and MTX IT on day 30. Patients then receive delayed intensification chemotherapy as in arm I. Patients receive interim maintenance II chemotherapy as in interim maintenance I chemotherapy, but with IV MTX starting at 2/3 of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) attained in interim maintenance I chemotherapy. Patients then receive maintenance chemotherapy as in arm I.
* Arm IV: Patients receive interim maintenance I chemotherapy as in arm III, delayed intensification chemotherapy as in arm I, interim maintenance II chemotherapy as in arm III, delayed intensification II chemotherapy as in arm II, and maintenance chemotherapy as in arm I.
* Augmented Treatment: Patients receive induction chemotherapy comprising daunorubicin IV continuously for 48 hours beginning no later than day 21; oral DM twice daily on days 14-27; and VCR IV on days 14 and 21. Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on days 21 and 35. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on days 21 and 28.

NOTE: Patients with T-cell disease should re-start with augmented consolidation and proceed as per the augmented regimen.

Beginning on day 35 of induction chemotherapy, patients receive consolidation therapy comprising CTX IV over 20-30 minutes on days 0 and 28; oral MP on days 0-13 and 28-41; ARA-C IV or SC daily on days 0-3, 7-10, 28-31, and 35-38; VCR IV on days 14, 21, 42, and 49; and PEG-ASP IM on days 14 and 42. Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on days 7, 14, and 21. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis receive MTX IT on day 7 and cranial irradiation as in the randomized treatment section. Patients with testicular leukemia receive radiotherapy as in the randomized treatment section.

Beginning on day 63 of consolidation chemotherapy, patients receive interim maintenance I chemotherapy comprising VCR IV on days 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40; escalating doses of MTX IV on days 10, 20, 30, and 40; PEG-ASP IM on days 1 and 21; and MTX IT on days 0 and 30.

Beginning on day 56 of interim maintenance I chemotherapy, patients receive delayed intensification I chemotherapy comprising oral DM twice daily on days 0-6 and 14-20; VCR IV on days 0, 7, 14, 42, and 49; DOX IV over 15 minutes to 2 hours on days 0, 7, and 14; PEG-ASP IM on days 3 and 42; CTX IV over 20-30 minutes on day 28; oral TG on days 28-41; ARA-C IV or SC daily on days 28-31 and 35-38; and MTX IT on days 0 and 28.

NOTE: Patients with T-cell disease who are in interim maintenance I chemotherapy with escalating IV methotrexate should continue this phase and then proceed as per the augmented regimen. If these patients are receiving conventional interim maintenance chemotherapy with oral methotrexate, they should stop and restart the interim maintenance as per the augmented regimen. These patients receive cranial irradiation starting on day 28 of delayed intensification II chemotherapy.

Beginning on day 56 of delayed intensification I chemotherapy, patients receive interim maintenance II chemotherapy as in interim maintenance I chemotherapy, but with IV MTX starting at 2/3 of the MTD attained in interim maintenance I chemotherapy.

NOTE: Patients with T-cell disease who are in delayed intensification I chemotherapy proceed with this phase, with the addition of 2 vincristine doses on days 42 and 49 and PEG-ASP on day 42. These patients then proceed as per the augmented regimen with the addition of cranial irradiation starting on day 28 of delayed intensification II chemotherapy.

NOTE: Patients with T-cell disease who are within 4 months of completing delayed intensification I chemotherapy and have not received interim maintenance II chemotherapy with escalating IV methotrexate or delayed intensification II chemotherapy receive a course of interim maintenance chemotherapy and delayed intensification II chemotherapy according to the augmented regimen. If these patients have received interim maintenance II chemotherapy with escalating IV methotrexate, they receive delayed intensification II chemotherapy according to the augmented regimen. These patients also receive cranial irradiation starting on day 28 of delayed intensification II chemotherapy and then proceed to maintenance therapy.

Beginning on day 56 of interim maintenance II chemotherapy, patients receive delayed intensification II chemotherapy as in delayed intensification I chemotherapy.

Beginning on day 56 of delayed intensification II chemotherapy, patients receive maintenance chemotherapy comprising oral DM twice daily on days 0-4, 28-32, and 56-60; VCR IV on days 0, 28, and 56; oral MP on days 0-83; oral MTX on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, and 77; and MTX IT on day 0.

Patients are followed every 4-8 weeks for one year, every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for one year, and then annually thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 2,037 randomized patients will be accrued for this study within 3.75 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Induction Not Randomized

Standard Induction (28 Days). M3 Marrow at Day 28 and Off Protocol Therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Induction and Oral MTX, Double Delayed Intensification CNS

Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis, without other unfavorable characteristics. Standard Induction (28 Days). Consolidation (28 days) and in remission Day 21 and at time of randomization, Interim maintenance I (2 months), Delayed intensification I (2 months), Interim maintenance II (2 months), Delayed intensification II (2 months), then Maintenance (12 week cycles). Cranial radiation therapy during the Consolidation phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo radiation therapy

Induction and Augmented regimen (IV MTX, Double DI)

Patients with unfavorable characteristics. Standard Induction (14 Days), Augmented Induction (Days 14-35), Consolidation (9 weeks), Interim Maintenance I (56 Days), Delayed Intensification I (2 months), Interim Maintenance II (2 months), Delayed Intensification II (2 months), then Maintenance (84 day courses).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo radiation therapy

Induction and Oral MTX, Single Delayed Intensification

Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis, with favorable cytogenetics. Standard Induction (28 Days). Consolidation (28 days) and in remission Day 21 and at time of randomization, Interim maintenance I (2 months), Delayed intensification I (2 months), Interim maintenance II (2 months) then Maintenance (12 week cycles). Biopsy-proven testicular leukemia pts at diagnosis will receive testicular radiation therapy during the consolidation phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo radiation therapy

Induction and Oral MTX, Double Delayed Intensification

Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis, with favorable cytogenetics. Standard Induction (28 Days). Consolidation (28 days) and in remission Day 21 and at time of randomization, Interim maintenance I (2 months), Delayed intensification I (2 months), Interim maintenance II (2 months), Delayed intensification II (2 months), then Maintenance (12 week cycles). Biopsy-proven testicular leukemia pts at diagnosis will receive testicular radiation therapy during the consolidation phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo radiation therapy

Induction and IV MTX, Single Delayed Intensification

Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis, with favorable cytogenetics. Standard Induction (28 Days). Consolidation (28 days) and in remission Day 21 and at time of randomization, Interim maintenance I (2 months), Delayed intensification I (2 months), Interim maintenance II (2 months) then Maintenance (12 week cycles). Biopsy-proven testicular leukemia pts at diagnosis will receive testicular radiation therapy during the consolidation phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo radiation therapy

Induction and IV MTX, Double Delayed Intensification

Patients without CNS disease at diagnosis, with favorable cytogenetics. Standard Induction (28 Days). Consolidation (28 days) and in event free remission Day 21 and at time of randomization, Interim maintenance I (2 months), Delayed intensification I (2 months), Interim maintenance II (2 months), Delayed intensification II (2 months), then Maintenance (12 week cycles). Biopsy-proven testicular leukemia pts at diagnosis will receive testicular radiation therapy during the consolidation phase.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IT

dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

methotrexate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO and IT

pegaspargase

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IM

thioguanine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

vincristine sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Undergo radiation therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cyclophosphamide

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

Given IT

Intervention Type DRUG

daunorubicin hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

dexamethasone

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

doxorubicin hydrochloride

Dose 25 g/m² IV Days 0, 7, 14, given over a period of 15 minutes to 2 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

mercaptopurine

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

methotrexate

Given PO and IT

Intervention Type DRUG

pegaspargase

Given IM

Intervention Type DRUG

thioguanine

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

vincristine sulfate

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

radiation therapy

Undergo radiation therapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cytoxan NSC-26271 Cytosine Arabinoside Ara_C Cytosar-U NSC-63878 Cerubidine NSC-82151 Decadron DM NSC-34521 Adriamycin NSC-123127 6-MP MTX PEG-asparaginase Oncaspar L-asparaginase with polyethylene glycol 6 TG NSC-752 Oncovin NSC-67574 VCR irradiation radiotherapy therapy radiation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

* Diagnosis of previously untreated B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

* More than 25% L1 or L2 lymphoblasts
* No more than 25% L3 lymphoblasts
* WBC \< 50,000/mm\^3
* No T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia by immunophenotyping
* Massive lymphadenopathy, massive splenomegaly, or large mediastinal mass allowed
* CNS or testicular leukemia allowed
* No patients found to have t(8;14)(q24;q32), t(8;22)(q24;q11), and t(2;8)(p11-p12;q24) (characteristic of Burkitt's lymphoma)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age:

* 1 to 9

Performance status:

* Not specified

Life expectancy:

* Not specified

Hematopoietic:

* See Disease Characteristics

Hepatic:

* Not specified

Renal:

* Not specified

Other:

* Not pregnant
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy:

* Not specified

Chemotherapy:

* No more than 72 hours since prior intrathecal cytarabine

Endocrine therapy:

* At least 30 days since prior systemic corticosteroids given for more than 48 hours
* Prior corticosteroids for mediastinal mass causing superior mediastinal syndrome allowed
* Prior or concurrent inhaled corticosteroids allowed

Radiotherapy:

* Prior radiotherapy for mediastinal mass causing superior mediastinal syndrome allowed
* No concurrent spinal radiotherapy

Surgery:

* Not specified
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Oncology Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yousif H. Matloub, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix Children's Hospital

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Downey, California, United States

Site Status

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Loma Linda University Cancer Institute at Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Central California

Madera, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of California Irvine Medical Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Orange County

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Sacramento

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center/Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Santa Clara

Santa Clara, California, United States

Site Status

General Robert Huyser Cancer Center at David Grant Medical Center

Travis Air Force Base, California, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Cancer Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Carole and Ray Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Connecticut Health Center

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Lombardi Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

AFLAC Cancer Center and Blood Disorders Service of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Scottish Rite Campus

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of Central Georgia

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Curtis & Elizabeth Anderson Cancer Institute at Memorial Health University Medical Center

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Mountain States Tumor Institute - Boise

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago Cancer Research Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Lutheran General Cancer Care Center

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Riley Children Cancer Center at Riley Hospital for Children

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Blank Children's Hospital

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Kosair Children's Hospital

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - LSU Health Sciences Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Alvin and Lois Lapidus Cancer Institute at Sinai Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baystate Regional Cancer Program at D'Amour Center for Cancer Care

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Josephine Ford Cancer Center at Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

DeVos Children's Hospital

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Bronson Methodist Hospital

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Breslin Cancer Center at Ingham Regional Medical Center

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Beaumont

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's - Duluth Clinic Cancer Center

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospitals and Clinics - Minneapolis/St. Paul

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota Cancer Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Children's Mercy Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Omaha

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

UNMC Eppley Cancer Center at the University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

St. Barnabas Medical Center

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark Beth Israel Medical Center

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

Paterson, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Valerie Fund Children's Center at Atlantic Health

Summit, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn Hospital Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Center at Maimonides Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Schneider Children's Hospital

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Weill Cornell Cancer Center at Cornell University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Long Island Cancer Center at Stony Brook University Hospital

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Cancer Center at Albert Einstein College of Medicine

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Medical College

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Presbyterian Cancer Center at Presbyterian Hospital

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dakota Cancer Institute at Innovis Health - Dakota Clinic

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Meritcare Roger Maris Cancer Center

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ireland Cancer Center at University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus Children's Hospital

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Children's Medical Center - Dayton

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo Children's Hospital

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Columbia River Oncology Program

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Doernbecher Children's Hospital at Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Sioux Valley Hospital and University of South Dakota Medical Center

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

East Tennessee State University Cancer Center at Johnson City Medical Center

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

East Tennessee Children's Hospital

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt Children's Hospital

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Austin

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Medical City Dallas Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Covenant Children's Hospital

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

MBCCOP - South Texas Pediatrics

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Cancer Center at Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Scott and White Hospital

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center - Seattle

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Group Health Central Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Deaconess Medical Center

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Mary Bridge Children's Hospital and Health Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University - Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center - Charleston Division

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Cabell Huntington Hospital

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellin Memorial Hospital

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Gundersen Lutheran Cancer Center at Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Marshfield Clinic - Marshfield Center

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

CCOP - Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Sydney Children's Hospital

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Royal Children's Hospital

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Princess Margaret Hospital for Children

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

British Columbia Children's Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

CancerCare Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

IWK Health Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Allan Blair Cancer Centre at Pasqua Hospital

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon Cancer Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Starship Children's Health

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group Bern

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group Geneva

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group Lausanne

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada New Zealand Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bruggers CS, Moyer-Mileur LJ, Ransdall L: Body composition, bone mineral acquisition, and cardiovascular fitness in children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: response to a home-based exercise and nutrition education program. [Abstract] 2006 Pediatric Academic Societies' Annual Meeting, April 29 - May 2, San Francisco, CA. A-3505.46, 2006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Matloub Y, Asselin BL, Stork LC, et al.: Outcome of children with T-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and standard risk (SR) features: results of CCG-1952, CCG-1991 and POG 9404. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-680, 195a, 2004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Taweel S, Shurin S, Weijer C; Children's Oncology Group. Disclosure of the right of research participants to receive research results: an analysis of consent forms in the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer. 2003 Jun 1;97(11):2904-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11391.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12767106 (View on PubMed)

Matloub Y, Bostrom BC, Hunger SP, Stork LC, Angiolillo A, Sather H, La M, Gastier-Foster JM, Heerema NA, Sailer S, Buckley PJ, Thomson B, Cole C, Nachman JB, Reaman G, Winick N, Carroll WL, Devidas M, Gaynon PS. Escalating intravenous methotrexate improves event-free survival in children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2011 Jul 14;118(2):243-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322909. Epub 2011 May 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21562038 (View on PubMed)

Matloub Y, Bostrom BC, Angiolillo AL, et al.: Children with NCI standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and TEL-AML1 or favorable chromosome trisomies are almost certain to be cured with graduated intensity therapy: results of the CCG - 1991 study. [Abstract] Blood 114 (22): A-320, 2009.

Reference Type RESULT

Matloub Y, Bostrom BC, Hunger SP, et al.: Escalating dose intravenous methotrexate without leucovorin rescue during interim maintenance is superior to oral methotrexate for children with standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SR-ALL): Children's Oncology Group study 1991. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-9, 2008.

Reference Type RESULT

Matloub Y, Angiolillo A, Bostrom B, et al.: Double delayed intensification (DDI) is equivalent to single DI (SDI) in children with National Cancer Institute (NCI) standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SR-ALL) treated on Children's Cancer Group (CCG) clinical trial 1991 (CCG-1991). [Abstract] Blood 108 (11): A-146, 2006.

Reference Type RESULT

Matloub Y, Rabin KR, Ji L, Devidas M, Hitzler J, Xu X, Bostrom BC, Stork LC, Winick N, Gastier-Foster JM, Heerema NA, Stonerock E, Carroll WL, Hunger SP, Gaynon PS. Excellent long-term survival of children with Down syndrome and standard-risk ALL: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood Adv. 2019 Jun 11;3(11):1647-1656. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019032094.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31160295 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCG-1991

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CDR0000067855

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCT00005945

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NCI-2012-02333

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U10CA098543

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1991

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.