Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplasia

NCT ID: NCT00136084

Last Updated: 2012-12-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

238 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two multi-agent chemotherapy regimens using different dosages of cytarabine to eliminate all detectable leukemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study compares the effectiveness of two doses of cytarabine combined with set doses of daunomycin and etoposide as an initial course of chemotherapy to eliminate minimal residual disease. Subsequent therapy is tailored according to cytogenetic risk features, assessments of minimal residual disease, and availability of a suitable donor for bone marrow transplant. Patients with higher risk disease features are given more intense therapy. For higher risk groups, transplant is given to patients with suitable donors.

Secondary objectives include:

* To assess the prognostic value of biological markers in childhood Acute Myeloid leukemia (AML).
* To compare the amounts of leukemia cells in the blood and bone marrow to study minimal residual disease(MRD).
* To relate non-invasive cardiac evaluation with health-related quality of life in AML patients treated with cardiotoxic therapy during and following therapy.

Detailed Description of Treatment Plan Induction I Patients will be randomly assigned to receive induction therapy that consists of daunomycin, etoposide, and high-dose or low-dose cytarabine.

High-Dose Cytarabine (HDAC) arm:

Cytarabine 3 gm/m2 IV days 1, 3, 5 Daunomycin 50 mg/m2 IV days 2, 4, 6 Etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 2-6

Low-Dose Cytarabine(LDAC) arm:

Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 IV days 1-10 (20 doses) Daunomycin 50 mg/m2 IV days 2, 4, 6 Etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 2-6

Induction II

Patients who have \< 1% MRD after Induction I will receive daunomycin, cytarabine, etoposide (ADE):

Daunomycin 50 mg/m2 IV days 1, 3, 5 Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 IV 1-8 (16 doses) Etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1-5

Patients who have ≥ 1% MRD after Induction I will receive daunomycin, cytarabine, etoposide (ADE) + gemtuzumab ozogamicin:

Daunomycin 50 mg/m2 IV days 1, 3, 5 Cytarabine 100 mg/m2IV days 1-8 (16 doses) Etoposide: 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1-5 Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) 3 mg/m2 IV on day 1.

Consolidation I (Chemotherapy course 3)

The chemotherapy administered in course 3 will be based on the participant's response and cytogenetic/morphologic subgroup

MRD+ patients (except those who received ADE + GO) Gemtuzumab ozogamicin 6 mg/m2 IV on day 1

MRD+ patients who had No response(NR) to induction I

These patients should proceed to Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) as soon as possible. In cases where SCT is delayed (e.g., during searches for unrelated donors), these patients should receive chemotherapy according to their cytogenetic or morphologic subtype until the time of SCT.

MRD- patients (i.e., patients who were MRD- after ADE or after GO) will receive risk-based intensification (RBI)

t(9;11) and inv(16) Cytarabine 500 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion for 120 hours Cladribine (2CDA) 9 mg/m2: IV over 30 minutes daily for 5 days

Amend 8 M4/M5 without t(9;11) or inv(16): CE Cytarabine 3 gm/m2 IV q12h x 6 doses (days 1-3) by continuous infusion for 3 hours. Etoposide 125 mg/m2 IV on days 2-5 by continuous infusion for at least one hour

t(8;21) and others: HAM Cytarabine 3 g/m2 IV x 6 doses (days 1-3) Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 IV days 3-4

Standard-risk patients with matched related donors and high-risk patients will proceed to stem cell transplant per institutional practice

Consolidation II (Chemotherapy course 4):

Cytarabine 3 gm/m2 IV q12 hours on days 1, 2, 8, 9 (8 doses) L-Asparaginase 6000 Units/m2 IM 3 hours after 4th and 8th doses of cytarabine

Consolidation III (Chemotherapy course 5) Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 IV days 1-3 Cytarabine 1 gm/m2 IV over 2 hours q12 hours on days 1-3 (6 doses)

Patients who are in first remission are eligible to be enrolled on the St. Jude protocols NKAML protocol and receive Natural Killer (NK) cell therapy instead of Consolidation III or after Consolidation III. At the discretion of their primary physician, these patients will be offered the option of enrolling on NKAML.

Some patients with biphenotypic leukemia respond poorly to AML-directed therapy, but respond quite well to lymphoid-directed therapy. Patients with such markers who have no response to induction I or who fail to achieve complete response (CR) after induction II will therefore receive lymphoid directed induction therapy. Other biphenotypic patients will continue to receive AML-directed therapy as described above

All patients will undergo lumbar puncture and receive an age-appropriate dose of intrathecal (IT) cytarabine at the time of diagnosis.

Patients without Central Nervous System disease (CNS)(i.e., less than 5 leukocytes per microliter of CSF (colony-stimulating factor) will receive one dose of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine (MHA) with each course of chemotherapy beginning with induction II.

Patients with overt CNS leukemia (more or equal to 5 leukocytes per l microliter of CSF and the presence of leukemic blast cells on CSF cytospin) will receive weekly IT MHA therapy beginning 1 week after the initial dose of IT cytarabine and continuing until the CSF is free of blast cells (minimum number of doses, 4). These patients will then receive 4 additional doses of intrathecal therapy with methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine (IT MHA) (minimum total number of doses, 8) at approximately 1-month intervals (generally given with each subsequent course of chemotherapy).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Leukemia,Erythroblastic, Acute Erythroblastic Leukemia, Acute Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HDAC (High-Dose Cytarabine)

Since limited characters are allowed in this passage, please see detailed Description for HDAC.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cladribine, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Dexamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

Since limited characters are allowed in this passage, please see detailed Description to know the dosage, dosage form, frequency of administration for the above mentioned drugs

LDAC (Low-Dose Cytarabine)

Since limited characters are allowed in this passage, please see detailed Description for LDAC.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Etoposide, Cytarabine, Gemtuzumab, L-asparaginase, Mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Mitoxantrone, Prednisone, Vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

Since limited characters are allowed in this passage, please see detailed Description to know the dosage, dosage form, frequency of administration for the above mentioned drugs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cladribine, Cyclophosphamide, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Dexamethasone

Since limited characters are allowed in this passage, please see detailed Description to know the dosage, dosage form, frequency of administration for the above mentioned drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide, Cytarabine, Gemtuzumab, L-asparaginase, Mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Mitoxantrone, Prednisone, Vincristine

Since limited characters are allowed in this passage, please see detailed Description to know the dosage, dosage form, frequency of administration for the above mentioned drugs

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia by immunophenotyping, morphology, and cytochemical staining; myelodysplasia; or biphenotypic leukemia.
* Age less than or equal to 21 years at time of study entry.
* No prior therapy for this malignancy (patients with secondary AML following treatment of primary malignancy are eligible) except for one dose of intrathecal therapy.
* Negative pregnancy test
* Patient does not have Down syndrome, acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), or juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML)

Exclusion Criteria

* Positive pregnancy test
* Down syndrome, acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), or juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML)
Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey Rubnitz, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford University Medical Center

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Michigan (Wayne State University)

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cook Children's Medical Center

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Children's Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elsayed AH, Rafiee R, Cao X, Raimondi S, Downing JR, Ribeiro R, Fan Y, Gruber TA, Baker S, Klco J, Rubnitz JE, Pounds S, Lamba JK. A six-gene leukemic stem cell score identifies high risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020 Mar;34(3):735-745. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0604-8. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31645648 (View on PubMed)

Gamazon ER, Lamba JK, Pounds S, Stark AL, Wheeler HE, Cao X, Im HK, Mitra AK, Rubnitz JE, Ribeiro RC, Raimondi S, Campana D, Crews KR, Wong SS, Welsh M, Hulur I, Gorsic L, Hartford CM, Zhang W, Cox NJ, Dolan ME. Comprehensive genetic analysis of cytarabine sensitivity in a cell-based model identifies polymorphisms associated with outcome in AML patients. Blood. 2013 May 23;121(21):4366-76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-464149. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23538338 (View on PubMed)

Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Dahl G, Ribeiro RC, Bowman WP, Taub J, Pounds S, Razzouk BI, Lacayo NJ, Cao X, Meshinchi S, Degar B, Airewele G, Raimondi SC, Onciu M, Coustan-Smith E, Downing JR, Leung W, Pui CH, Campana D. Minimal residual disease-directed therapy for childhood acute myeloid leukaemia: results of the AML02 multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jun;11(6):543-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70090-5. Epub 2010 May 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20451454 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.stjude.org

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01CA113482

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

AML02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id