Decitabine and Cytarabine in Treating Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, or Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
NCT ID: NCT02121418
Last Updated: 2018-04-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2018-02-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Decitabine Followed by Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride, Etoposide, and Cytarabine in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
NCT01729845
Decitabine as Maintenance Therapy After Standard Therapy in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00416598
High-Dose Cytarabine Plus Deoxycytidine in Treating With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Other Hematologic Malignancies
NCT00002818
Decitabine With GCLAM for Adults With Newly Diagnosed, Relapsed, or Refractory AML or High-Risk MDS
NCT02921061
Decitabine, Cytarabine, and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01627041
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. Examine whether a combination of decitabine given for 10 days (days 1-10), rather than the usual 5 days, plus "standard dose cytarabine (ara-C) (100 mg/m\^2 daily days 1-7) might improve 6-month survival probability from the historical 65% to 80% in patients age \>= 60 with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
II. Test whether this combination might maintain complete response (CR) rate at our historic 45% in these patients.
III. Study factors that lead physicians to escalate or maintain ara-C doses in those patients who have had an "intermediate response" short of CR to the first 2 cycles of the combination.
IV. While maintaining awareness of confounding covariates, examine the effect of such dose escalation on CR rate.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive decitabine intravenously (IV) daily on days 1-10 and cytarabine IV once daily (QD) on days 1-7. Treatment repeats every 28-35 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After course 3, patients achieving remission will receive 1-2 more courses of therapy at the same dose. Patients in remission with significant side effects will receive decitabine and cytarabine at decreased doses. Patients not achieving remission will not receive any more treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 6 months and then periodically.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment (decitabine, cytarabine)
Patients receive decitabine IV daily on days 1-10 and cytarabine IV QD on days 1-7. Treatment repeats every 28-35 days for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After course 3, patients achieving remission will receive 1-2 more courses of therapy at the same dose. Patients in remission with significant side effects will receive decitabine and cytarabine at decreased doses. Patients not achieving remission will not receive any more treatment.
Cytarabine
Given IV
Decitabine
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cytarabine
Given IV
Decitabine
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* High-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia 2 (CMML2) as defined by 10-19% myeloid blasts in either blood or marrow
* Patients may have received azacitidine, decitabine, or lenalidomide but no "cytotoxic therapy" such as ara-C or anthracyclines; data suggest that failure to respond to azacitidine reduces probability of response to 3+7; hence in the interest of having a relatively homogeneous population, while patients who have received and failed azacitidine or decitabine will be eligible for this study, they will be analyzed separately from patients who have not received these drugs
* Treatment related mortality (TRM) score \< 22.9; patients with TRM scores \> 13.1, in whom the risk of death within 28 days of beginning induction therapy has averaged 41%, will preferentially be placed on protocol 2642
* Provision of written informed consent
* Note, unlike pharmaceutical company sponsored protocols eligibility is not conditioned on bilirubin, creatinine, or absence of other malignancy within the past 2-3 years; the TRM score incorporates creatinine and thus a high creatinine can in principle be offset by favorable values for the other covariates in the TRM score; bilirubin was not a covariate in the TRM; furthermore, in the doses we are using, dose adjustment of decitabine or ara-C is not indicated in the presence of renal or hepatic abnormalities; our broad eligibility criteria may increase the likelihood that our results will be generalizable; the inability to reproduce results of early phase AML studies has been a problem in the past
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pamela S Becker
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pamela Becker
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bozeman Deaconess Hospital
Bozeman, Montana, United States
Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology
Kennewick, Washington, United States
EvergreenHealth Medical Center
Kirkland, Washington, United States
Skagit Valley Hospital
Mount Vernon, Washington, United States
Olympic Medical Center
Port Angeles, Washington, United States
Group Health Cooperative
Redmond, Washington, United States
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, United States
Multicare Health System
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Wenatchee Valley Hospital and Clinics
Wenatchee, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2014-00769
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9019
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.