Decitabine, Cytarabine, and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT01627041
Last Updated: 2025-11-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE2
178 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-09-16
2026-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary I. To determine whether epigenetic priming with decitabine prior to standard cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride "7+3" induction chemotherapy has sufficient efficacy to warrant further development as assessed by an overall CR1 rate ≥ 50%.
II. To establish the safety and expected toxicities of decitabine when used as priming for cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride "7+3" induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
III. To assess the pharmacodynamics of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) hypomethylation when decitabine is administered as a short infusion.
IV. To investigate, in selected cases, the molecular and cellular consequences of decitabine-induced hypomethylation by assessing the effects of decitabine-mediated hypomethylation on transcriptional patterns in AML cells, and by determining the effect of hypomethylation on the differentiation and/or apoptosis of leukemic blasts. (exploratory) V. To identify biomolecular correlates of treatment response (biomarkers) to induction chemotherapy in AML based upon the epigenetic pattern of DNA methylation in AML specimens obtained prior to treatment. (exploratory)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to age (less than 50 years vs 50-65 years), white blood cell count (≤ 30 K/mL vs greater than 30 K/mL), cytogenetic risk group (intermediate vs adverse risk), and antecedent hematological condition preceding the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients receive induction chemotherapy comprising daunorubicin hydrochloride intravenously (IV) daily on days 1-3 and cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-7 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who do not achieve a complete remission (CR) after the first induction-chemotherapy course receive a second identical induction course.
Arm II: Patients receive decitabine IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -1. Patients then receive induction chemotherapy as in arm I in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who do not achieve a CR after the first induction-chemotherapy course receive a second identical induction course.
Patients undergo blood, bone marrow, and oral mucosa cells sample collection at baseline, prior to induction therapy, and after treatment for DNA methylation studies and pharmacodynamic studies.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 10 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (daunorubicin hydrochloride, cytarabine)
Patients receive induction chemotherapy comprising daunorubicin hydrochloride IV daily on days 1-3 and cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-7 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who do not achieve a CR after the first induction-chemotherapy course receive a second identical induction course.
Cytarabine
Given IV
Daunorubicin Hydrochloride
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Pharmacological Study
Correlative studies
Arm II (decitabine, daunorubicin hydrochloride, cytarabine)
Patients receive decitabine IV over 1 hour on days -5 to -1. Patients then receive induction chemotherapy as in arm I in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who do not achieve a CR after the first induction-chemotherapy course receive a second identical induction course.
Cytarabine
Given IV
Daunorubicin Hydrochloride
Given IV
Decitabine
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Pharmacological Study
Correlative studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cytarabine
Given IV
Daunorubicin Hydrochloride
Given IV
Decitabine
Given IV
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Pharmacological Study
Correlative studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Molecular AML-risk group is less-than-favorable as defined by any of the following criteria:
* The absence of good-risk karyotype t(8;21), inv(16), t(16;16), or t(15;17)identified by metaphase karyotype
* The absence of t(8;21), inv(16), t(16;16), or t(15;17) identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization(FISH)
* The absence of the corresponding fusion transcripts, AML1-eight-twenty-one corepressor (ETO), core-binding factor, beta subunit (CBFβ)-smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)-retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARa), identified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
* Patient does not have acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL, French-American-British \[FAB\] M3)
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥ 60%)
* Adequate cardiac function as defined by either of the following:
* An echocardiogram demonstrating an ejection fraction within normal limits
* A multi gated acquisition (MUGA) scan demonstrating an ejection fraction within normal limits
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)(serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT)(serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase \[SGPT\]) ≤ 2.5 times institutional upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL OR creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
* Total bilirubin ≤ 2 times ULN
* Patients with documented diagnosis of Gilbert syndrome resulting in elevated total bilirubin levels will be eligible, provided all other eligibility criteria are met
* Patients with a total bilirubin of 2-3 mg/dL and direct (conjugated) bilirubin in the normal range will be eligible, provided all other eligibility criteria are met
* Pregnant and nursing subjects may not be enrolled and pregnancy must be avoided; women of child-bearing potential-defined as a sexually active woman who has not undergone hysterectomy and who has had menses any time within the preceding 24 months-must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days prior to registration; women and men of childbearing potential must either commit to continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse or commit to two acceptable methods of birth control-one highly effective method (e.g., IUD, oral or non-oral hormonal contraceptive, tubal ligation or partner's vasectomy) and one additional effective method (e.g., latex condom, diaphragm or cervical cap) at the same time from the time of screening through final Treatment Response Assessment
* NOTE: should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, the subject should inform their treating phy-sician immediately
* NOTE: the effects of decitabine on the developing human fetus are unknown but it is a know teratogen in mammals (mice)
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Concurrent treatment with other investigational agents is not permitted
* Cumulative lifetime dose of anthracycline chemotherapeutic \> 80 mg/m\^2
* History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition of decitabine, cytarabine or daunorubicin
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness considered by the investigator to constitute an unwarranted high risk for investigational drug treatment; examples include, but not limited to the following:
* Uncontrolled serious infection; or
* Unstable angina pectoris; or
* Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia; or
* Active second malignancy requiring treatment; or
* Symptomatic congestive heart failure
* HIV-positive subjects with a CD4 count \< 200 cells/μL are excluded due to the increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive chemotherapy(87)
* NOTE: subjects with HIV infection and a CD4 count \>= 200 cells/μL are eligible but combination antiretroviral therapy should be held during administration of chemotherapy due to the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with decita-bine, cytarabine or daunorubicin. Antiretroviral therapy may be resumed 24 hours after completion of the last dose of induction chemotherapy
* Subject has a psychiatric disorder, altered mental status or social situation that would preclude understanding of the informed consent process and/or limit compliance with study requirements
* Subject has an inability or unwillingness, in the opinion of the investigator, to comply with the protocol requirements
* Subjects with central nervous system (CNS) (or leptomeningeal) infiltration by AML may be considered for treatment at the Investigator's discretion and following discussion with the Principle Investigator; all neurologic deficits must be noted prior to enrollment on study
* Subject has circulating blast count \> 50,000/μL (subjects may be enrolled if circulating blast count is controlled by hydroxyurea and/or, if clinically indicated, by leukophoresis)
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph M Scandura
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lafayette Family Cancer Center-EMMC
Brewer, Maine, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
NYP/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hospital
The Bronx, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus
The Bronx, New York, United States
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2012-01959
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
1106011736
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000712322
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
1106011736
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
8854
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-2012-01959
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id