Comparing Three Different Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT ID: NCT00634244
Last Updated: 2015-07-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-10-31
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Flavopiridol, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia
NCT00470197
Flavopiridol, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Patients With Acute Leukemia
NCT00016016
Alvocidib, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00795002
Alvocidib, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride or Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01349972
Cyclosporine, Pravastatin Sodium, Etoposide, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT01342887
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To determine the complete remission (CR) + cytogenic complete remission (CRc) + morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate of carboplatin and topotecan; flavopiridol, mitoxantrone and cytosine arabinoside and sirolimus, mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytosine arabinoside in adult patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
NOTE: Since the CRc patients are required to be either CR or CRi, we only report the rate of CR+CRi in the results section.
II. To determine the rate of treatment failure of these regimens. III. To determine the incidence and severity of toxicities of these regimens. IV. To analyze the predictive value of blast cell properties that have been suggested to determine response. (Correlative laboratory studies) V. To determine whether pretreatment levels of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) or, alternatively, whether a therapy-induced change in topoisomerase I levels correlates with response to this regimen. (Correlative laboratory studies) VI. To assess the impact of clonal evolution by comparing cytogenetic abnormalities at the time of relapse with those at initial diagnosis and correlating these abnormalities and changes with response to the treatment regimens in this protocol. (Cytogenetic and fluorescent in situ hybridization \[FISH\] studies) VII. Panel FISH studies for common AML rearrangements will be performed on relapse AML specimens to determine the presence of these recurrent AML abnormalities and to evaluate for subtle additional abnormalities consistent with clonal evolution in these relapse specimens. (Cytogenetic and FISH studies)
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
INDUCTION THERAPY:
ARM A: Patients receive carboplatin and topotecan hydrochloride intravenously (IV) continuously over 24 hours on days 1-5.
ARM B: Patients receive alvocidib IV over 4.5 hours once daily (QD) on days 1-3, cytarabine IV continuously over 72 hours on days 6-8, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 1-2 hours on day 9.
ARM C: Patients receive sirolimus orally (PO) QD on days 2-9, mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes QD, etoposide IV over 1 hour QD, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours QD on days 4-8 or 5-9. (Closed to accrual)
After completion of induction therapy, patients in all arms undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. Patients with persistent leukemia (i.e., leukemic blasts \>= 10%) are removed from study and are offered alternative therapy at the discretion of the investigator. Patients who achieve CR proceed to consolidation therapy or receive alternative therapy at the discretion of the investigator.
CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Beginning within 2-6 weeks after documentation of CR, patients may receive up to 2 additional courses of the same treatment they received during induction therapy. Courses repeat every 4-10 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for up to 3 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A (carboplatin and topotecan hydrochloride)
Patients receive carboplatin and topotecan hydrochloride IV continuously over 24 hours on days 1-5.
carboplatin
Given IV
topotecan hydrochloride
Given IV
Arm B (alvocidib, mitoxantrone, cytarabine)
Patients receive alvocidib IV over 4.5 hours QD on days 1-3, cytarabine IV continuously over 72 hours on days 6-8, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 1-2 hours on day 9.
alvocidib
Given IV
mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Given IV
cytarabine
Given IV
Arm C (sirolimus, mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine)
Patients receive sirolimus PO QD on days 2-9, mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes QD, etoposide IV over 1 hour QD, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours QD on days 4-8 or 5-9. (Closed to accrual)
mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Given IV
cytarabine
Given IV
sirolimus
Given PO
etoposide
Given IV
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
alvocidib
Given IV
mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Given IV
carboplatin
Given IV
cytarabine
Given IV
sirolimus
Given PO
etoposide
Given IV
topotecan hydrochloride
Given IV
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must have morphologic proof (from bone marrow aspirate, smears or touch preps of marrow biopsy) of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with \>= 10% blasts within two weeks prior to induction randomization
* NOTE: Patients must be registered to E3903 (Ancillary Laboratory Protocol for Collecting Diagnostic Material on Patients Considered for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\]-American College of Radiology Imaging Network \[ACRIN\] Treatment Trials for Leukemia or Related Hematologic Disorders) and must undergo eligibility testing for the study by multiparameter flow cytometry
* All immunodiagnoses are eligible for E1906, except acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) (proven by the presence of promyelocytic leukemia (PML)/retinoic acid receptor (RAR) alpha); cases of APL can become eligible if the patient is ineligible for an ECOG-ACRIN APL trial or if all-trans retinoic acid or arsenic trioxide is not planned as part of the treatment regimen
* Patients must qualify for one of the following:
* Relapse =\< 6 months after first CR, dated from documentation of CR to documentation of relapse
* Relapse between 6-12 months after first CR
* Refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy (=\< 2 courses) or to first reinduction (=\< 1 course)
* Normal cardiac ejection fraction by pretreatment multi gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram within 4 weeks prior to randomization (resting ejection fraction \>= 50% or \>= 5% increase with exercise), shortening fraction by echocardiogram \>= 24%, or to within the normal range of values for the institution
* Prior treatment to doses of any of the following:
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of doxorubicin
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of daunorubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of idarubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of mitoxantrone
* Serum creatinine =\< 2.0 mg/dL
* Serum direct bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dL
* Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) (aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\]) \< 4 x upper limit of normal
* The above stipulation for normal hepatic function does not apply if liver dysfunction is due to leukemia infiltration
* Prior to study entry, patients must have recovered from toxicities of prior chemotherapy and radiotherapy; for patients refractory to induction chemotherapy (patient subgroup outlined above), marrow documentation of residual leukemia post chemotherapy and qualification for remaining eligibility criteria are needed prior to study entry (this does not require \>= 30% marrow blasts to be evident but a minimum of 10% blasts must be present in the marrow)
* NOTE: Hydroxyurea is permitted within 4 weeks of study entry
* ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Patients with a history of central nervous system (CNS) leukemia are eligible if there is documentation of no current CNS involvement on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, (i.e., negative CSF by lumbar puncture)
Consolidation therapy:
* Patients must have an ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Patients must have documented CR
* Patients must have an absence of infection or have infection controlled by antibiotics; patients who are septic will be excluded
* Patients must have a serum creatinine clearance \> 50 cc/minute
* Patients must have a serum direct bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dl and alkaline phosphatase and SGOT (AST) \< 4 x upper limits of normal
* Patients must have a normal cardiac ejection fraction by MUGA or echocardiogram prior to consolidation (resting ejection fraction \>= 50% or \>= 5% increase with exercise), shortening fraction by echocardiogram \>= 24%, or to within normal range of values for the institution prior to the first and second cycle of consolidation for arms B and C
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have relapsed \> 1 year after achieving first CR or are in \>= second relapse
* Patients who have had a prior allogeneic OR autologous stem cell transplant
* History of recent myocardial infarction (within three months), uncontrolled congestive heart failure, or uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
* Prior treatment with carboplatin, topotecan, flavopiridol, or sirolimus
* Pregnant or breast feeding. Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males should use an accepted and effective method of contraception
* Intercurrent organ damage or medical problems that would prohibit therapy; no active or unresolved infection
* Current evidence of invasive fungal infection; such evidence includes positive blood or deep tissue cultures or stains
* Have another (i.e., prior) tumor which is currently active and likely to interfere with the patient's treatment for AML or which is likely to compromise the patient's morbidity or mortality substantially
Consolidation therapy:
* Intercurrent organ damage or medical problems that will jeopardize the outcome of therapy
* For arms B and C, patients have exceeded the following anthracycline doses or their equivalents:
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of doxorubicin
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of daunorubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of idarubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of mitoxantrone
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark Litzow
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Mayo Clinic in Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Siouxland Hematology Oncology Associates
Sioux City, Iowa, United States
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
The Jewish Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Medical Center-Cancer Center Hazleton
Hazleton, Pennsylvania, United States
Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Lewistown Hospital
Lewistown, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Medical Group
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Mount Nittany Medical Center
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Wyoming Valley
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2009-00520
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
E1906
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NCI-2009-00520
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.