Comparing Three Different Combination Chemotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00634244

Last Updated: 2015-07-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized phase II trial is comparing three different combination chemotherapy regimens to see how well they work in treating patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Flavopiridol, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia

NCT00470197

Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7) Adult Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0) Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a) +13 more
COMPLETED PHASE1

Flavopiridol, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Patients With Acute Leukemia

NCT00016016

Recurrent Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia +2 more
COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2

Alvocidib, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT00795002

Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasia Following Myelodysplastic Syndrome Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7) Adult Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0) +14 more
COMPLETED PHASE2

Alvocidib, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride or Cytarabine and Daunorubicin Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT01349972

Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasia Following Myelodysplastic Syndrome Adult Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0) Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a) +13 more
COMPLETED PHASE2

Cyclosporine, Pravastatin Sodium, Etoposide, and Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT01342887

Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7) Adult Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0) Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a) +12 more
TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the complete remission (CR) + cytogenic complete remission (CRc) + morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate of carboplatin and topotecan; flavopiridol, mitoxantrone and cytosine arabinoside and sirolimus, mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytosine arabinoside in adult patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

NOTE: Since the CRc patients are required to be either CR or CRi, we only report the rate of CR+CRi in the results section.

II. To determine the rate of treatment failure of these regimens. III. To determine the incidence and severity of toxicities of these regimens. IV. To analyze the predictive value of blast cell properties that have been suggested to determine response. (Correlative laboratory studies) V. To determine whether pretreatment levels of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) or, alternatively, whether a therapy-induced change in topoisomerase I levels correlates with response to this regimen. (Correlative laboratory studies) VI. To assess the impact of clonal evolution by comparing cytogenetic abnormalities at the time of relapse with those at initial diagnosis and correlating these abnormalities and changes with response to the treatment regimens in this protocol. (Cytogenetic and fluorescent in situ hybridization \[FISH\] studies) VII. Panel FISH studies for common AML rearrangements will be performed on relapse AML specimens to determine the presence of these recurrent AML abnormalities and to evaluate for subtle additional abnormalities consistent with clonal evolution in these relapse specimens. (Cytogenetic and FISH studies)

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.

INDUCTION THERAPY:

ARM A: Patients receive carboplatin and topotecan hydrochloride intravenously (IV) continuously over 24 hours on days 1-5.

ARM B: Patients receive alvocidib IV over 4.5 hours once daily (QD) on days 1-3, cytarabine IV continuously over 72 hours on days 6-8, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 1-2 hours on day 9.

ARM C: Patients receive sirolimus orally (PO) QD on days 2-9, mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes QD, etoposide IV over 1 hour QD, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours QD on days 4-8 or 5-9. (Closed to accrual)

After completion of induction therapy, patients in all arms undergo bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. Patients with persistent leukemia (i.e., leukemic blasts \>= 10%) are removed from study and are offered alternative therapy at the discretion of the investigator. Patients who achieve CR proceed to consolidation therapy or receive alternative therapy at the discretion of the investigator.

CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Beginning within 2-6 weeks after documentation of CR, patients may receive up to 2 additional courses of the same treatment they received during induction therapy. Courses repeat every 4-10 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed periodically for up to 3 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7) Adult Acute Minimally Differentiated Myeloid Leukemia (M0) Adult Acute Monoblastic Leukemia (M5a) Adult Acute Monocytic Leukemia (M5b) Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia With Maturation (M2) Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Without Maturation (M1) Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Inv(16)(p13;q22) Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(16;16)(p13;q22) Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(8;21)(q22;q22) Adult Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia (M4) Adult Erythroleukemia (M6a) Adult Pure Erythroid Leukemia (M6b) Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A (carboplatin and topotecan hydrochloride)

Patients receive carboplatin and topotecan hydrochloride IV continuously over 24 hours on days 1-5.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

topotecan hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Arm B (alvocidib, mitoxantrone, cytarabine)

Patients receive alvocidib IV over 4.5 hours QD on days 1-3, cytarabine IV continuously over 72 hours on days 6-8, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 1-2 hours on day 9.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

alvocidib

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Arm C (sirolimus, mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine)

Patients receive sirolimus PO QD on days 2-9, mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes QD, etoposide IV over 1 hour QD, and cytarabine IV over 3 hours QD on days 4-8 or 5-9. (Closed to accrual)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

sirolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Given PO

etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

Given IV

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

alvocidib

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

carboplatin

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

cytarabine

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

sirolimus

Given PO

Intervention Type DRUG

etoposide

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

topotecan hydrochloride

Given IV

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FLAVO flavopiridol HMR 1275 L-868275 CL 232315 DHAD DHAQ Carboplat CBDCA JM-8 Paraplat Paraplatin ARA-C arabinofuranosylcytosine arabinosylcytosine Cytosar-U cytosine arabinoside AY 22989 Rapamune rapamycin SLM EPEG VP-16 VP-16-213 hycamptamine Hycamtin SKF S-104864-A TOPO

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Induction Therapy:

* Patients must have morphologic proof (from bone marrow aspirate, smears or touch preps of marrow biopsy) of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with \>= 10% blasts within two weeks prior to induction randomization

* NOTE: Patients must be registered to E3903 (Ancillary Laboratory Protocol for Collecting Diagnostic Material on Patients Considered for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\]-American College of Radiology Imaging Network \[ACRIN\] Treatment Trials for Leukemia or Related Hematologic Disorders) and must undergo eligibility testing for the study by multiparameter flow cytometry
* All immunodiagnoses are eligible for E1906, except acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) (proven by the presence of promyelocytic leukemia (PML)/retinoic acid receptor (RAR) alpha); cases of APL can become eligible if the patient is ineligible for an ECOG-ACRIN APL trial or if all-trans retinoic acid or arsenic trioxide is not planned as part of the treatment regimen
* Patients must qualify for one of the following:

* Relapse =\< 6 months after first CR, dated from documentation of CR to documentation of relapse
* Relapse between 6-12 months after first CR
* Refractory to conventional initial induction chemotherapy (=\< 2 courses) or to first reinduction (=\< 1 course)
* Normal cardiac ejection fraction by pretreatment multi gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram within 4 weeks prior to randomization (resting ejection fraction \>= 50% or \>= 5% increase with exercise), shortening fraction by echocardiogram \>= 24%, or to within the normal range of values for the institution
* Prior treatment to doses of any of the following:

* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of doxorubicin
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of daunorubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of idarubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of mitoxantrone
* Serum creatinine =\< 2.0 mg/dL
* Serum direct bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dL
* Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) (aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\]) \< 4 x upper limit of normal

* The above stipulation for normal hepatic function does not apply if liver dysfunction is due to leukemia infiltration
* Prior to study entry, patients must have recovered from toxicities of prior chemotherapy and radiotherapy; for patients refractory to induction chemotherapy (patient subgroup outlined above), marrow documentation of residual leukemia post chemotherapy and qualification for remaining eligibility criteria are needed prior to study entry (this does not require \>= 30% marrow blasts to be evident but a minimum of 10% blasts must be present in the marrow)

* NOTE: Hydroxyurea is permitted within 4 weeks of study entry
* ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Patients with a history of central nervous system (CNS) leukemia are eligible if there is documentation of no current CNS involvement on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, (i.e., negative CSF by lumbar puncture)

Consolidation therapy:

* Patients must have an ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Patients must have documented CR
* Patients must have an absence of infection or have infection controlled by antibiotics; patients who are septic will be excluded
* Patients must have a serum creatinine clearance \> 50 cc/minute
* Patients must have a serum direct bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dl and alkaline phosphatase and SGOT (AST) \< 4 x upper limits of normal
* Patients must have a normal cardiac ejection fraction by MUGA or echocardiogram prior to consolidation (resting ejection fraction \>= 50% or \>= 5% increase with exercise), shortening fraction by echocardiogram \>= 24%, or to within normal range of values for the institution prior to the first and second cycle of consolidation for arms B and C

Exclusion Criteria

Induction therapy:

* Patients who have relapsed \> 1 year after achieving first CR or are in \>= second relapse
* Patients who have had a prior allogeneic OR autologous stem cell transplant
* History of recent myocardial infarction (within three months), uncontrolled congestive heart failure, or uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
* Prior treatment with carboplatin, topotecan, flavopiridol, or sirolimus
* Pregnant or breast feeding. Women of childbearing potential and sexually active males should use an accepted and effective method of contraception
* Intercurrent organ damage or medical problems that would prohibit therapy; no active or unresolved infection
* Current evidence of invasive fungal infection; such evidence includes positive blood or deep tissue cultures or stains
* Have another (i.e., prior) tumor which is currently active and likely to interfere with the patient's treatment for AML or which is likely to compromise the patient's morbidity or mortality substantially

Consolidation therapy:

* Intercurrent organ damage or medical problems that will jeopardize the outcome of therapy
* For arms B and C, patients have exceeded the following anthracycline doses or their equivalents:
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of doxorubicin
* \< 300 mg/m\^2 of daunorubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of idarubicin
* \< 100 mg/m\^2 of mitoxantrone
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark Litzow

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Siouxland Hematology Oncology Associates

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

The Jewish Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Center-Cancer Center Hazleton

Hazleton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lewistown Hospital

Lewistown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Group

State College, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mount Nittany Medical Center

State College, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Wyoming Valley

Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Rambam Medical Center

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2009-00520

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E1906

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U10CA021115

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

NCI-2009-00520

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.