Surgery vs. Casting for Displaced Articular Radius Fractures in Elderly

NCT ID: NCT03009890

Last Updated: 2023-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

138 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-01

Study Completion Date

2022-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: to compare the functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with non-operative cast treatment for elderly patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: there is no consensus about the optimal treatment of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients. To ensure optimal functional outcome there is a tendency to operate. However, there is no evidence that supports the surgical treatment of patients aged 65 years or older and in the absence of clinical trials it stays unclear how elderly patients with intra-articular fractures should be treated.

Study design: multi-center randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority design. Economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled multi-center trial.

Study population: all consecutive patients aged between 65 years and older with displaced intra-articular (AO Type C) distal radius fractures, with a not acceptable reduction within 3 weeks following trauma.

Intervention: patients will be randomized between open reduction and internal fixation (intervention group) and plaster immobilization (control group).

Main study parameters: the primary outcome will be evaluated after 1 year with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE). Secondary outcomes comprise other patient reported outcome measures (PROM) including the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Quality of life (EQ-5D) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Further outcome measurements comprise a costs evaluation questionnaire, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, radiographic parameters and Complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radius Distal Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open reduction internal fixation

Surgical open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Surgery (Open Reduction Internal Fixation)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Either volar of dorsal plating or both

Plaster immobilization

Standard local hospital protocol for cast treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cast treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hospitals may use their preferred protocol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery (Open Reduction Internal Fixation)

Either volar of dorsal plating or both

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cast treatment

Hospitals may use their preferred protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ORIF Open Reduction Internal Fixation Plaster

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \> 65 years at time of trauma
* Intra-articular distal radius fracture (AO type C\*)
* One or more of the following fracture characteristics within 3 weeks post-trauma (including secondary dislocation):

≤15° inclination \<5 mm radial length \>15° dorsal tilt \>20° volar tilt intra-articular gap or step-off \>2 mm
* \< 3 weeks post trauma
* Living independent
* Fit for surgery
* Mentally competent
* Dutch fluency and literacy
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Open fractures
* Neurovascular damage
* Multiple-trauma patients (ISS \>16)
* Other fractures in the injured extremity other than ulnar styloid process fractures
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maasstad Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Deventer Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

JointResearch

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rudolf W Poolman, Prof. MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ter Meulen DP, Mulders MAM, Kruiswijk AA, Kret EJ, Slichter ME, van Dongen JM, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Goslings JC, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Willigenburg NW, Schep NWL, Poolman RW; DART Study Group. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgery versus casting for elderly patients with Displaced intra-Articular type C distal Radius fractures: protocol of a randomised controlled Trial with economic evaluation (the DART study). BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e051658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051658.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35365511 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL56858.100.16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4