Comparison of Functional Recovery After Distal Intra-articular Radius Fracture With a Dorsal Tilt Treated With an Anterior Plate Versus a Posterior Plate
NCT ID: NCT03259906
Last Updated: 2024-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-31
2018-07-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
First-generation posterior plates presented complications related to the size of the plate, notably tendon lesions. Over the last ten years, a new generation of thinner anterior plates has reduced these complications.
In the literature, few studies have compared these two techniques in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. The hypothesis of this research is that osteosynthesis using a posterior plate is more effective than that with an anterior plate in terms of functional recovery in patients older than 45 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Restoration of the Radial Length in Compound Wrist Fractures Using Anterior Locking Plates
NCT00330122
Internal Plate Fixation vs. Plaster in Complete Articular Distal Radial Fractures
NCT02651779
Metaphyseal Distal Radius Fractures
NCT01156766
Comparison of Three Fixation Techniques for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures
NCT00524719
Distraction Osteogenesis for Distal Radius Fractures vs. Volar Plating
NCT03635060
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Osteosynthesis using a posterior plate
DASH score
Questionnaire asking about Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
X-ray
postoperative x-rays at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
posterior osteosynthesis
Osteosynthesis using a posterior plate
Osteosynthesis using an anterior plate
DASH score
Questionnaire asking about Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
X-ray
postoperative x-rays at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
Anterior osteosynthesis
Osteosynthesis using an anterior plate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DASH score
Questionnaire asking about Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand
X-ray
postoperative x-rays at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months
posterior osteosynthesis
Osteosynthesis using a posterior plate
Anterior osteosynthesis
Osteosynthesis using an anterior plate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients older than 45 years
* Patients presenting a closed intra-articular fracture of the distal radius with a dorsal tilt (stages B2, C1, C2 and C3)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients without national health insurance cover
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Patients presenting other injuries in the same upper limb
* Patients presenting injuries of the wrist or hand (scapholunate injury, fracture of the carpal bone or fingers)
* Pre-trauma paralysis of the limb
* Open fracture
* Fracture with palmer tilt or extra-articular
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALVERNHE LABATTUT 2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.