Three Weeks of Cast Immobilisation Versus One Week of Brace Immobilisation in Distal Radius Fractures

NCT ID: NCT06235957

Last Updated: 2024-02-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Three weeks of cast immobilisation versus one week of brace immobilisation in non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients \<50 years of age treated non-operatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Currently, non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures are treated by three to five weeks of cast immobilisation. Many patients with a distal radius fracture suffer from long-term functional restrictions, which might be related to stiffness due to cast immobilisation. Current literature indicates that one week of immobilisation might be safe, however, no level one evidence is available. This trial aims to compare one week of brace immobilisation with three weeks of cast immobilisation in patients with distal radius fractures that do not need reduction.

Methods: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of one week of brace immobilisation in patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures. A single blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial will be conducted in three hospitals. Adult patients, between 18-50 years old, independent for activities of daily living, with a non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture can be included in this study. The intervention group is treated with one week of brace immobilisation, and the control group with three weeks of cast immobilisation. Primary outcome is the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation-score at six months. Secondary outcomes are: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-score at six weeks and six months, PRWE at six weeks, range of motion, pain, radiological outcome, complications and cost effectiveness measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimension questionnaire, Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire.

Discussion: This study will provide evidence on the optimal period of immobilisation in non-operatively treated displaced and reduced distal radius fractures. Both treatment options are accepted treatment protocols and both treatment options have a low risk of complications. Follow-up will be according to the current treatment protocol. This study will provide level one evidence on the optimal period and way of immobilisation for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Distal Radius Fractures Fractures, Bone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study will be conducted as a single-blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial in three hospitals. In this study, three weeks of cast immobilisation is compared to one week of brace immobilisation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
A blinded evaluation of the trial patients functional status, radiographs and range of motion will be performed by a research assistant by use of the PRWE and qDASH scores

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Three weeks of cast immobilisation

Group Type OTHER

Cast 3 weeks

Intervention Type OTHER

patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group A are treated by cast immobilization for 3 weeks

Group B

One week of brace immobilisation

Group Type OTHER

Brace 1 week

Intervention Type OTHER

patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group B are treated in a brace for 1 week

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cast 3 weeks

patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group A are treated by cast immobilization for 3 weeks

Intervention Type OTHER

Brace 1 week

patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group B are treated in a brace for 1 week

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 18-50 years (to eliminate osteoporosis);
2. Primary non- or minimally displaced DRF;
3. Independent for activities of daily living.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Fracture of the contralateral wrist;
2. Ipsilateral fractures, proximal of the DRF;
3. Pre-existent abnormalities or functional deficits of the fractured wrist;
4. Open fractures;
5. Polytrauma patients
6. Language disability to understand the Dutch patient information and questionnaires.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maasstad Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amsterdam UMC

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spaarne Gasthuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank W Bloemers, Prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Amsterdam UMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amsterdam Umc

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Spaarne Gasthuis

Haarlem, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Maasstad Ziekenhuis

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Eva van Delft, MD

Role: CONTACT

020 - 566 3111

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Suus GJ van Bruggen, MD

Role: primary

020-5669111

Nico L Sosef, MD

Role: primary

023-22400000

Niels WL Schep, MD PhD

Role: primary

010 291 1911

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ABR 81638 | NL81638.029.22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non Randomized Humerusshaft Fracture
NCT00205972 COMPLETED PHASE4