Three Weeks of Cast Immobilisation Versus One Week of Brace Immobilisation in Distal Radius Fractures
NCT ID: NCT06235957
Last Updated: 2024-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2026-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surgery vs. Casting for Displaced Articular Radius Fractures in Elderly
NCT03009890
Cast OFF Trial: One Versus Four-five Weeks of Plaster Cast Immobilization
NCT03240471
Distal Radial Fractures in the Late Middle Aged
NCT02353338
Four or Six Weeks of Immobilization in the Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Population?
NCT05370365
Distal Radial Fractures in Adult Patients: 4 Weeks Versus 6 Weeks of Cast Immobilization
NCT07234370
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of one week of brace immobilisation in patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures. A single blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial will be conducted in three hospitals. Adult patients, between 18-50 years old, independent for activities of daily living, with a non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture can be included in this study. The intervention group is treated with one week of brace immobilisation, and the control group with three weeks of cast immobilisation. Primary outcome is the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation-score at six months. Secondary outcomes are: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-score at six weeks and six months, PRWE at six weeks, range of motion, pain, radiological outcome, complications and cost effectiveness measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimension questionnaire, Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire.
Discussion: This study will provide evidence on the optimal period of immobilisation in non-operatively treated displaced and reduced distal radius fractures. Both treatment options are accepted treatment protocols and both treatment options have a low risk of complications. Follow-up will be according to the current treatment protocol. This study will provide level one evidence on the optimal period and way of immobilisation for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Three weeks of cast immobilisation
Cast 3 weeks
patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group A are treated by cast immobilization for 3 weeks
Group B
One week of brace immobilisation
Brace 1 week
patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group B are treated in a brace for 1 week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cast 3 weeks
patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group A are treated by cast immobilization for 3 weeks
Brace 1 week
patients will be treated either in a cast or a brace, patients in group B are treated in a brace for 1 week
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Primary non- or minimally displaced DRF;
3. Independent for activities of daily living.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Ipsilateral fractures, proximal of the DRF;
3. Pre-existent abnormalities or functional deficits of the fractured wrist;
4. Open fractures;
5. Polytrauma patients
6. Language disability to understand the Dutch patient information and questionnaires.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maasstad Hospital
OTHER
Amsterdam UMC
OTHER
Spaarne Gasthuis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank W Bloemers, Prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Amsterdam UMC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Amsterdam Umc
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Spaarne Gasthuis
Haarlem, North Holland, Netherlands
Maasstad Ziekenhuis
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ABR 81638 | NL81638.029.22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.