Symptomatic Treatment of Distal Tubercle Fractures of the Scaphoid

NCT ID: NCT02366234

Last Updated: 2016-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

AIM:

The aim of this study is to assess whether patients with an acute distal tubercle fracture of the scaphoid treated with a removable brace for 4 to 6 weeks have the same level of symptoms and disability 6 months after injury as the average for the normal population.

NULL HYPOTHESIS:

Patients with an acute distal tubercle fracture of the scaphoid have Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand) scores at or above the population norm (a score of 13 in Norway and 10.9 in the United States) 6 months after injury when treated symptomatically with a removable brace.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fractures of the distal scaphoid tubercle are uncommon and seem relatively benign. Not a lot is known in literature about this specific type of avulsion fracture and the treatment. Some surgeons recommend a cast for 4 to 6 weeks while others treat their patients with a removable brace. The only non-union reported in literature is Jonssen who published a case in 1990 about a non-union of a tubercle fracture in a patient with repeated trauma. Kraus et al studied 81 cases of acute scaphoid fractures and found 4 cases of tubercle avulsion fractures in this group. We suspect some patients will not seek care for this condition as it hurts for a bit and then causes no problems.

Response variables:

* Quick DASH measured 6 months after injury
* 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity 6 months after trauma

Explanatory variables:

* Socio-demographics
* Age, sex, ethnicity, race, marital status, education, work status
* Questionnaires
* Quick DASH after trauma (\< 2 weeks)
* 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity 6 months after trauma
* 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment 6 months after trauma

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Distal Tubercle Fractures of the Scaphoid

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fracture of Distal Tubercle of Scaphoid

Questionnaires

* Quick DASH after trauma (\< 2 weeks)
* 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity 6 months after trauma
* 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment 6 months after trauma

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Fracture of the distal tubercle of the scaphoid on radiographs
* Interval between injury and diagnosis of less than 2 months
* English or Spanish fluency and literacy

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Inability to complete enrollment forms due to any mental status or language problems (e.g. dementia, head injury, overall illness)
* Patients with other fractures or injuries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Haaglanden Medical Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Skane University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ghaem Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David C. Ring, MD

Chief of Hand and Upper Extremity Service

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Ring, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014P002670

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id