A Clinical Trial for the Surgical Treatment of Elderly Distal Radius Fractures

NCT ID: NCT01589692

Last Updated: 2019-02-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

304 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-10

Study Completion Date

2019-01-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the United States, over 300,000 individuals over age 65 suffer from distal radius fractures (DRFs) each year. Despite the frequency of this injury and over 200 years of experience treating DRFs, management of elderly DRFs is still controversial. Close reduction and casting is a nonsurgical technique that is frequently used, but osteoporotic fractures, common in the elderly, often collapse and displace. The three currently applied surgical techniques are close reduction and percutaneous pinning, external fixation with or without percutaneous pinning, and internal fixation with volar locking plating. Preliminary evidence indicates that locking plate fixation can permit elderly patients to move their hands and wrists much sooner in order to return to self-care activities more quickly. Although these outcomes are promising, there is no randomized controlled clinical trial to demonstrate that the more invasive, and perhaps more costly, plating technique is superior to the other simpler approaches.

The specific aim of this 24-center randomized controlled trial is to compare outcomes of these three surgical techniques in treating unstable DRFs in the elderly. The secondary aim is to follow a cohort of elderly patients who choose not to have surgery to evaluate outcomes following treatment by close reduction and casting alone. This clinical trial is the most ambitious study in hand surgery by assembling most of the leading centers in North America to collect evidence-based data to guide future treatment of this prevalent injury in the growing elderly population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Distal Radius Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Internal Fixation

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: Internal fixation with a volar locking plating system

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Internal fixation with a volar locking plating system

External Fixation

External Fixation with a bridging external fixator. Can be done with or without percutaneous pinning.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

External Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

External Fixation with a bridging external fixator. Can be done with or without percutaneous pinning.

Pinning

Percutaneous pinning with any number of Kirschner wires

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous Pinning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pinning with any number of Kirschner wires

No Surgery

Closed Reduction and casting: Closed reduction and immobilization with a cast and/or splint

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Closed Reduction and casting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Closed reduction and immobilization with a cast and/or splint

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Internal fixation with a volar locking plating system

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

External Fixation

External Fixation with a bridging external fixator. Can be done with or without percutaneous pinning.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous Pinning

Pinning with any number of Kirschner wires

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Closed Reduction and casting

Closed reduction and immobilization with a cast and/or splint

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have an unstable DRF for which surgical fixation is indicated

o AO type A2, A3, C1, C2
* At least one of the following radiographic criteria indicating fracture instability

* Dorsal angulation of greater than 10°
* Radial inclination angle of less than 15°
* Radial shortening of greater than 3mm
* Patients with the ability to read and understand English (to complete study questionnaires)
* Community-dwelling patients
* Patients 60 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have suffered open DRFs
* Patients with bilateral DRFs
* Patients with associated upper extremity fractures or ligament injuries (including ulnar styloid fracture, TFCC and wrist ligament injuries) requiring repair at the time of DRF fixation
* Multi-trauma patients
* Patients with prior DRF on the same wrist
* Patients with comorbid conditions prohibiting surgery
* Patients with neurologic disorders that affect hand, wrist or arm sensation or movement
* Patients who have a history of dementia, Alzheimer's Disease or other serious psychiatric disorders
* Patients with current substance abuse
* Patients who do not agree to be randomized
* Patients who have DRFs that are not equally suited for each procedure (i.e. severely comminuted fractures)
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Kevin C. Chung

Charles B. G. de Nancrede Professor of Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kevin C Chung, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Connecticut

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Norton Healthcare

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

North Shore - Long Island Jewish Health System

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

OrthoCarolina

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kettering Health Network

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The MetroHealth System

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Washington

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Fraser Health Authority

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

University of Western Ontario

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

National University of Singapore

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chung KC, Song JW; WRIST Study Group. A guide to organizing a multicenter clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):515-523. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181df64fa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20375760 (View on PubMed)

Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST) Study Group. Reflections 1 year into the 21-Center National Institutes of Health--funded WRIST study: a primer on conducting a multicenter clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Jun;38(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.02.027. Epub 2013 Apr 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23608306 (View on PubMed)

Jayaram M, Wu H, Yoon AP, Kane RL, Wang L, Chung KC. Comparison of Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes in Older Adults Stratified by Chronologic vs Physiologic Age Managed With Casting vs Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255786. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55786.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36780156 (View on PubMed)

Yoon AP, Wang Y, Wang L, Chung KC; and the WRIST Group. What Are the Tradeoffs in Outcomes after Casting Versus Surgery for Closed Extraarticular Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients? A Statistical Learning Model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2691-2700. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001865.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34142664 (View on PubMed)

Chung KC, Kim HM, Malay S, Shauver MJ; WRIST Group. Comparison of 24-Month Outcomes After Treatment for Distal Radius Fracture: The WRIST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2112710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.12710.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34137830 (View on PubMed)

Yoon AP, Wang C, Speth KA, Wang L, Chung KC; WRIST Group. Modifiable Factors Associated With Chronic Pain 1 Year After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fractures: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2028929. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28929.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33337492 (View on PubMed)

Hooper RC, Zhou N, Wang L, Shauver MJ, Chung KC; WRIST Group. Pre-injury activity predicts outcomes following distal radius fractures in patients age 60 and older. PLoS One. 2020 May 20;15(5):e0232684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232684. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32433648 (View on PubMed)

Chung KC, Cho HE, Kim Y, Kim HM, Shauver MJ; WRIST Group. Assessment of Anatomic Restoration of Distal Radius Fractures Among Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919433. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19433.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31951273 (View on PubMed)

Chung KC, Malay S, Shauver MJ, Kim HM; WRIST Group. Assessment of Distal Radius Fracture Complications Among Adults 60 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the WRIST Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7053.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30657531 (View on PubMed)

Nasser JS, Huetteman HE, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. Older Patient Preferences for Internal Fixation after a Distal Radius Fracture: A Qualitative Study from the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):34e-41e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004454.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29952895 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01AR062066-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01AR062066-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.