Cast Immobilization Versus Percutaneous Pinning for Fracture of Radius in an Elderly Patient

NCT ID: NCT06209242

Last Updated: 2024-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Distal radius fractures, particularly in elderly individuals, are a common problem associated with increasing age and hormonal changes. The choice of treatment, such as cast immobilization or percutaneous pinning, plays a crucial role in achieving optimal functional outcomes and facilitating a return to normal activities. This study aimed to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of cast immobilization and percutaneous pinning in elderly patients with distal radius fractures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Distal radius fractures, particularly in elderly individuals, are a common problem associated with increasing age and hormonal changes. The choice of treatment, such as cast immobilization or percutaneous pinning, plays a crucial role in achieving optimal functional outcomes and facilitating a return to normal activities. This study aimed to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of cast immobilization and percutaneous pinning in elderly patients with distal radius fractures.

Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled participants aged over 60 years with AO23-A2 or AO23-A3 distal radius fractures and no contraindications for local anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to either the cast immobilization or percutaneous pinning group. Follow-up was conducted for 3 months, during which radiological outcomes and clinical outcomes were assessed. Radiological parameters included radial angulation, while clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, range of motion, and grip strength. Additionally, data on complications and pain levels measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were collected for the percutaneous pinning group under local anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Closed Fracture of Lower End of Radius

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled participants aged over 60 years with AO23-A2 or AO23-A3 distal radius fractures and no contraindications for local anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to either the cast immobilization or percutaneous pinning group.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cast immobilization

Using cast immobilization with sugar tong and short arm splinting

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cast immobilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using sugar tong slab and then replace to short arm casting within 1 week

Percutaneous pinning

Using k-wire percutaneous pinning

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous pinning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using k- wire percutaneous pinning with local anesthesia with one-day surgery protocol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous pinning

Using k- wire percutaneous pinning with local anesthesia with one-day surgery protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cast immobilization

Using sugar tong slab and then replace to short arm casting within 1 week

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* aged \>60 years
* primary distal end radius fracture type AO23-A2 or AO23-A3

Exclusion Criteria

* multiple trauma
* onset \> 2 weeks
* systemic diseases such as RA
* steroid user
* contraindication for LA
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Teerasit Punprasitwech, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

QSMVH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial hospital

Chon Buri, Sriracha, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

027/2564

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hematoma Block Versus Bier Block for Closed Fracture Reduction
NCT05086224 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1