A Phase 3 Clinical Trial of CCX168 (Avacopan) in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

NCT ID: NCT02994927

Last Updated: 2025-03-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

331 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-15

Study Completion Date

2019-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 (avacopan) to induce and sustain remission in patients with active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), when used in combination with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, or in combination with rituximab.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Complement 5a and its receptor C5aR (CD88) are involved in the pathogenesis of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis.

This is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orally-administered, selective C5aR inhibitor CCX168 (avacopan) in inducing and sustaining remission in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) treated concomitantly with Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine.

Study acquired by Amgen and all disclosures were done by previous sponsor ChemoCentryx.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
This study was double-blind, double-dummy, i.e., placebo capsules were identical in appearance to the avacopan capsules, and prednisone capsules also had matching placebo capsules. To maintain the blind, multiple measures were taken (i.e., randomization code was not accessible to study personnel who had contact with study centers or who were involved in data management and analysis for the duration of the study).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prednisone group

Avacopan-matching placebo plus cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or rituximab plus a full starting dose of prednisone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

Avacopan-matching placebo twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days):

\- Three avacopan-matching placebo capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose.

Oral prednisone tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days):

* Prednisone 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was \<55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to the protocol-specified schedule.
* Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone dose of 30 mg per day.

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Orally or intravenously administered

Rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravenously administered

Azathioprine

Intervention Type DRUG

Orally administered

Avacopan group

Avacopan plus cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or rituximab plus prednisone-matching placebo.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Avacopan

Intervention Type DRUG

Avacopan 30 mg twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days):

\- Three 10 mg avacopan capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose.

Oral prednisone-matching placebo tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days):

* Prednisone-matching placebo capsules equivalent to 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was \<55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to a protocol-specified schedule.
* Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone-matching placebo dose of 30 mg per day.

Cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

Orally or intravenously administered

Rituximab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intravenously administered

Azathioprine

Intervention Type DRUG

Orally administered

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Avacopan

Avacopan 30 mg twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days):

\- Three 10 mg avacopan capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose.

Oral prednisone-matching placebo tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days):

* Prednisone-matching placebo capsules equivalent to 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was \<55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to a protocol-specified schedule.
* Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone-matching placebo dose of 30 mg per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

Avacopan-matching placebo twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days):

\- Three avacopan-matching placebo capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose.

Oral prednisone tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days):

* Prednisone 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was \<55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to the protocol-specified schedule.
* Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone dose of 30 mg per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide

Orally or intravenously administered

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

Intravenously administered

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Azathioprine

Orally administered

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CCX168

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) or microscopic polyangiitis
* Male and female subjects, aged at least 18 years, with newly-diagnosed or relapsed associated vasculitis (AAV) where treatment with cyclophosphamide or rituximab is needed; where approved by Regulatory Agencies, adolescents (12-17 year old) may be enrolled
* Use of adequate contraception
* Positive test for anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) or anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO)
* At least 1 major item, or at least 3 non-major items, or at least the 2 renal items of proteinuria and hematuria on Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)
* Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥15 mL/minute/1.73 m\^2 at screening

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding
* Alveolar hemorrhage requiring pulmonary ventilation support at screening
* Any other known multi-system autoimmune disease
* Required dialysis or plasma exchange within 12 weeks prior to screening
* Have a kidney transplant
* Received cyclophosphamide within 12 weeks prior to screening; if on azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate at the time of screening, these drugs must be withdrawn prior to receiving the cyclophosphamide or rituximab dose on Day 1
* Received intravenous glucocorticoids, \>3000 mg methylprednisolone equivalent, within 4 weeks prior to screening
* Have been taking an oral daily dose of a glucocorticoid of more than 10 mg prednisone-equivalent for more than 6 weeks continuously prior to screening
* Received rituximab or other B-cell antibody within 52 weeks of screening or 26 weeks provided B cell reconstitution has occurred (i.e., CD19 count \> 0.01x10\^9/L); received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment, abatacept, alemtuzumab, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), belimumab, tocilizumab, or eculizumab within 12 weeks prior to screening
* For patients scheduled to receive cyclophosphamide treatment, urinary outflow obstruction, active infection (especially varicella zoster infection), or platelet count \<50,000/μL before start of dosing
* Participated previously in a CCX168 study
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Trial Site

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Auchenflower, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Clayton, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Concord, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Liverpool, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nambour, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Randwick, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Saint Albans, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Southport, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Westmead, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Feldkirch, , Austria

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Calgary, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Greenfield Park, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Hamilton, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Sherbrooke, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Vancouver, , Canada

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Roskilde, , Denmark

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Angers, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Boulogne-sur-Mer, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Bron, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Colmar, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Metz, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Bad Bramstedt, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Fulda, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Kirchheim unter Teck, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Ludwigshafen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Cork, , Ireland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Ancona, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Aichi, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Akita, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Hokkaido, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Ishikawa, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Kagawa, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Kanagawa, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Miyazaki, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Saitama, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Shimane, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Shizuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Toyama, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Dunedin, , New Zealand

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Grafton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Takapuna, , New Zealand

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nordbyhagen, , Norway

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Tromsø, , Norway

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Burela de Cabo, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

San Sebastián, , Spain

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Fribourg, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Basildon, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Canterbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Carshalton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Dorchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Dudley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Exeter, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Inverness, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Kirkcaldy, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Newcastle, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Reading, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Clinical Trial Site

Westcliff-on-Sea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Japan Netherlands New Zealand Norway Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Geetha D, Neumann T, Karras A, Cid MC, Merkel PA, Bray S, Bozeman AM, Jayne DRW; Members of the ADVOCATE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of avacopan for treatment of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving cyclophosphamide. RMD Open. 2025 Oct 5;11(4):e005743. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005743.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41052893 (View on PubMed)

Geetha D, Dua A, Yue H, Springer J, Salvarani C, Jayne D, Merkel P; ADVOCATE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving rituximab in a randomised trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):223-232. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224816.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37979959 (View on PubMed)

Soulsby WD. Journal Club Review of "Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis". ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;4(7):558-561. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11412. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35167187 (View on PubMed)

Jayne DRW, Merkel PA, Schall TJ, Bekker P; ADVOCATE Study Group. Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):599-609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023386.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33596356 (View on PubMed)

Merkel PA, Jayne DR, Wang C, Hillson J, Bekker P. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avacopan, a C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(4):e16664. doi: 10.2196/16664.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32088663 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ADVOCATE

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CL010_168

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Iptacopan in Patients With ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT06388941 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Abatacept in ANCA Associated Vasculitis
NCT00482066 TERMINATED PHASE2
Avacostar - (PASS)
NCT05897684 RECRUITING
Belimumab in Remission of VASculitis
NCT01663623 COMPLETED PHASE3