Study on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Pathway Optimization: A Focus on Patient Identification, Chronicization Factors and Outcome Predictors
NCT ID: NCT02964130
Last Updated: 2019-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-31
2019-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A multidisciplinary approach through a pain management clinical network, as it has been structured in Poitiers, will ensure that an exhaustive characterization of FBSS patients and their care pathway will be collected. In addition, since the cooperation between orthopaedic and neuro spine surgeons is not a common relationship found all over Europe (as it is observed in Poitiers), this study also aims to better understand the development of interactions between physicians/professionals and the substantial advantage which would result from bridging this gap. The N3MT (NeuroMapping Tools) software developed in Poitiers to collect data and assess objectively pain surface and intensity changes, before/after any treatment, with quantitative measurements, will be used as the central key of this project.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study Comparing Conventional, Burst and High Frequency (HF) Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Refractory Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) Patients After a 32-contact Surgical Lead Implantation
NCT03014583
Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Instrumentation for FBSS
NCT05466110
Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) as "Hybrid Stimulation" After Failure of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) to Control the Back Pain Component in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) Patients.(CUMPNS Study)
NCT02110888
Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT01036529
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the FACET FIXation Implant.
NCT05645497
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Follow-up patient
Medical follow-up visit
No name
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No name
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient is ≥ 18 years of age at time of "Informed Consent Form" signature.
* Patient had most recent back surgery more than 6 months ago.
* Patient has developed post-operative Chronic Back with or without Leg Pain (potential FBSS).
* Patient has persistent back pain for more than 6 months.
* Average low back or leg pain is ≥ 4 as assessed by the baseline NPRS.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient is or has been treated with SCS, subcutaneous or peripheral nerve stimulation, an intrathecal drug delivery system.
* Investigator suspects substance abuse that might confound the study results.
* Patient has a life expectancy of less than 12 months beyond study enrollment.
* Patient is less than 18 years of age.
* Patient is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
* Patient is unable to undergo study assessments or complete questionnaires independently (e.g., is illiterate).
* Patient is a member of a vulnerable population.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Poitiers University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe RIGOARD, PU-PH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Poitiers Hospital University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Poitiers Hospital University
Poitiers, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Billot M, Ounajim A, Moens M, Goudman L, Deneuville JP, Roulaud M, Nivole K, Many M, Baron S, Lorgeoux B, Bouche B, Lampert L, David R, Rigoard P. The Added Value of Digital Body Chart Pain Surface Assessment as an Objective Biomarker: Multicohort Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 16;27:e62786. doi: 10.2196/62786.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-A01144-47
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.