Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2018-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to Treat Depression in Autism Spectrum Disorder
NCT06142955
Feasibility and Efficacy of rTMS in Depression in Patients With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
NCT07258914
rTMS for Depression in Young Adults With Autism
NCT04972136
rTMS for Adults With Autistic Spectrum Disorder
NCT01918787
TMS for the Investigation of Brain Plasticity in Autism Spectrum Disorders
NCT02836405
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Exploratory sub-aim - Monitoring for durability of response: The investigators hypothesize that subjects receiving rTMS will demonstrate durability of response in their depression symptom reduction, as measured by HAM-D scores at 1 month and 3 months post-TMS.
Aim 2. Determine the effect of left DLPFC rTMS on core symptoms of ASD: The investigators hypothesize that subjects will experience reduction in core symptoms of ASD after completing all 25 sessions, as compared with their symptom burden prior to initiating treatment. For social and communication deficits, informant and/or self-report evaluations will be made pre- and post-TMS with the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Ritvo Autism Aspergers Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R) and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). Repetitive and restricted behavior will be evaluated using the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R), the ABC, and RAADS.
Exploratory sub-aim: Determine if there are changes to functional brain connectivity during face and object processing tasks via functional MRI imaging in patients with Autism who receive rTMS: The study investigators hypothesize that there will be altered brain connectivity evident in patients' baseline fMRI during cognitive processing tasks prior to TMS reflected as both hyper- and hypo-connectivity, and that there will be some level of normalization of these patterns in fMRI after completion of TMS series, particularly in the prefrontal cortex.
Exploratory sub-aim - Monitoring for durability of response: The study investigators hypothesize that subjects receiving rTMS will exhibit durability of response in their ASD symptom reduction, as measured by ABC, SRS, RAADS, AND RBR scores at 1 month and 3 months post-TMS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rTMS
Participants will receive rTMS sessions according to the study protocol.
NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA)
Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA)
Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Moderate to severe intellectual disability (ID) as defined by IQ \< 60, determined by prior IQ testing or Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASC-II) if no prior test results available
* Other psychiatric or neurodevelopmental illness that is the primary area of clinical focus (including but not limited to primary psychotic disorder, substance abuse disorder, and ASD or ID which are secondary to genetic syndromes)
* Active suicidal ideation or suicide attempt in the 90 days prior to initial assessment
* Presence of any metal implants or devices in the head or neck (e.g. metal plates or screws)
* No participants who are pregnant or who are planning to become pregnant
* have metal pins, plates or clips in the body or have orthodontics
* have surgical implants such as pacemakers or cochlear implants
* have permanent makeup or tattoos near the face or head
* have metal fragments in the body (from welding, shrapnel, BB guns) or suspect that they have fragments
* are claustrophobic
* are pregnant
* have ever suffered a closed head injury or concussion
* are currently under the influence of alcohol or other recreational drugs
* are a smoker
* are currently enrolled in a course in which the PI or co-I's are instructors
* cannot understand the task instructions
* cannot lay still in the mock scanner for a period of 6 minutes
* Inability or unwillingness of participant or legal guardian/representative to give informed consent
* There will be no discrimination or exclusions based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other socioeconomic factors. Of note, while both male and female participants will be actively and equally recruited using the same methods. The natural distribution of autism in the population skews towards significant towards male gender, with male prevalence being 4-5 times that of female prevalence. Our study will therefore likely have more male participants than female due to this trend in prevalence.
* Children (age \<18) are being excluded from this study for several reasons. While autism is a pediatric neurodevelopmental disorder with symptom onset as young as one year of age, it is also one that is chronic throughout adulthood. Both children with autism and neurotypical children undergo periods of rapid change in brain size, structure, and organization as they age, and the interaction between a full rTMS series and brains that are still involved in periods of very active development and whom may also be at different points along their own developmental timelines may skew or alter the data that is collected. Additionally, due to both brain growth and increases in skull thickness, children of different ages may have significantly different "scalp to cortex" distances, which can result in very different patterns of cortical stimulation despite uniform coil positioning. This will be an added, unnecessary variable which would compromise the attempt at performing a standardized protocol. Finally, while high frequency rTMS is an FDA approved treatment for depression in adults, it has not yet been FDA approved in children and adolescents.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Perera T, George MS, Grammer G, Janicak PG, Pascual-Leone A, Wirecki TS. The Clinical TMS Society Consensus Review and Treatment Recommendations for TMS Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder. Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):336-346. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
Oberman LM, Enticott PG, Casanova MF, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A, McCracken JT; TMS in ASD Consensus Group. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: Challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research. Autism Res. 2016 Feb;9(2):184-203. doi: 10.1002/aur.1567. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
George MS, Raman R, Benedek DM, Pelic CG, Grammer GG, Stokes KT, Schmidt M, Spiegel C, Dealmeida N, Beaver KL, Borckardt JJ, Sun X, Jain S, Stein MB. A two-site pilot randomized 3 day trial of high dose left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for suicidal inpatients. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
Enticott PG, Fitzgibbon BM, Kennedy HA, Arnold SL, Elliot D, Peachey A, Zangen A, Fitzgerald PB. A double-blind, randomized trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder. Brain Stimul. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Home page with information about the Primary Investigator
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00056546
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.