TMS for Adults With Autism and Depression

NCT ID: NCT02939560

Last Updated: 2019-10-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this proposal is to investigate whether a standard rTMS protocol for depression, including multiple sessions applied to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) results in reduction of depressive symptoms for adult patients with ASD and MDD (Aim 1). The secondary goal is to investigate and whether there is any beneficial reduction in the core symptoms of autism (Aim 2).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim 1. Determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of left-sided DLPFC high frequency rTMS on MDD symptoms in patients with ASD: The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving the rTMS will tolerate the treatment course without difficulty and have clinically significant reduction of depressive symptoms after receiving all 25 sessions, as compared with their symptom burden prior to initiating TMS. Depression symptom data will be collected as pre- and post-TMS scores on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Depression scores will also be monitored periodically during course of TMS with Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9).

Exploratory sub-aim - Monitoring for durability of response: The investigators hypothesize that subjects receiving rTMS will demonstrate durability of response in their depression symptom reduction, as measured by HAM-D scores at 1 month and 3 months post-TMS.

Aim 2. Determine the effect of left DLPFC rTMS on core symptoms of ASD: The investigators hypothesize that subjects will experience reduction in core symptoms of ASD after completing all 25 sessions, as compared with their symptom burden prior to initiating treatment. For social and communication deficits, informant and/or self-report evaluations will be made pre- and post-TMS with the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Ritvo Autism Aspergers Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R) and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). Repetitive and restricted behavior will be evaluated using the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R), the ABC, and RAADS.

Exploratory sub-aim: Determine if there are changes to functional brain connectivity during face and object processing tasks via functional MRI imaging in patients with Autism who receive rTMS: The study investigators hypothesize that there will be altered brain connectivity evident in patients' baseline fMRI during cognitive processing tasks prior to TMS reflected as both hyper- and hypo-connectivity, and that there will be some level of normalization of these patterns in fMRI after completion of TMS series, particularly in the prefrontal cortex.

Exploratory sub-aim - Monitoring for durability of response: The study investigators hypothesize that subjects receiving rTMS will exhibit durability of response in their ASD symptom reduction, as measured by ABC, SRS, RAADS, AND RBR scores at 1 month and 3 months post-TMS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Autism Spectrum Disorder Depression Depressive Disorder Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rTMS

Participants will receive rTMS sessions according to the study protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NeuroStar® TMS device (Neuronetics, Atlanta, GA)

Participants in this study arm will be evaluated before and after receiving rTMS. Outcome measures will include social skills rating scales, depression rating scales and cognitive tasks while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder and active depressive symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria

* List specific contraindicationsUncontrolled and/or untreated seizure disorder as defined by any incidence of seizure within the past 6 months. Patients with diagnosed epilepsy, or prior seizures, will be allowed in the study if they are taking an anticonvulsant medication, or have not had a seizure in the past year off medications.
* Moderate to severe intellectual disability (ID) as defined by IQ \< 60, determined by prior IQ testing or Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASC-II) if no prior test results available
* Other psychiatric or neurodevelopmental illness that is the primary area of clinical focus (including but not limited to primary psychotic disorder, substance abuse disorder, and ASD or ID which are secondary to genetic syndromes)
* Active suicidal ideation or suicide attempt in the 90 days prior to initial assessment
* Presence of any metal implants or devices in the head or neck (e.g. metal plates or screws)
* No participants who are pregnant or who are planning to become pregnant

* have metal pins, plates or clips in the body or have orthodontics
* have surgical implants such as pacemakers or cochlear implants
* have permanent makeup or tattoos near the face or head
* have metal fragments in the body (from welding, shrapnel, BB guns) or suspect that they have fragments
* are claustrophobic
* are pregnant
* have ever suffered a closed head injury or concussion
* are currently under the influence of alcohol or other recreational drugs
* are a smoker
* are currently enrolled in a course in which the PI or co-I's are instructors
* cannot understand the task instructions
* cannot lay still in the mock scanner for a period of 6 minutes
* Inability or unwillingness of participant or legal guardian/representative to give informed consent
* There will be no discrimination or exclusions based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other socioeconomic factors. Of note, while both male and female participants will be actively and equally recruited using the same methods. The natural distribution of autism in the population skews towards significant towards male gender, with male prevalence being 4-5 times that of female prevalence. Our study will therefore likely have more male participants than female due to this trend in prevalence.
* Children (age \<18) are being excluded from this study for several reasons. While autism is a pediatric neurodevelopmental disorder with symptom onset as young as one year of age, it is also one that is chronic throughout adulthood. Both children with autism and neurotypical children undergo periods of rapid change in brain size, structure, and organization as they age, and the interaction between a full rTMS series and brains that are still involved in periods of very active development and whom may also be at different points along their own developmental timelines may skew or alter the data that is collected. Additionally, due to both brain growth and increases in skull thickness, children of different ages may have significantly different "scalp to cortex" distances, which can result in very different patterns of cortical stimulation despite uniform coil positioning. This will be an added, unnecessary variable which would compromise the attempt at performing a standardized protocol. Finally, while high frequency rTMS is an FDA approved treatment for depression in adults, it has not yet been FDA approved in children and adolescents.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Perera T, George MS, Grammer G, Janicak PG, Pascual-Leone A, Wirecki TS. The Clinical TMS Society Consensus Review and Treatment Recommendations for TMS Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder. Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):336-346. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27090022 (View on PubMed)

Oberman LM, Enticott PG, Casanova MF, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A, McCracken JT; TMS in ASD Consensus Group. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: Challenges, promise, and roadmap for future research. Autism Res. 2016 Feb;9(2):184-203. doi: 10.1002/aur.1567. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26536383 (View on PubMed)

George MS, Raman R, Benedek DM, Pelic CG, Grammer GG, Stokes KT, Schmidt M, Spiegel C, Dealmeida N, Beaver KL, Borckardt JJ, Sun X, Jain S, Stein MB. A two-site pilot randomized 3 day trial of high dose left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for suicidal inpatients. Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24731434 (View on PubMed)

Enticott PG, Fitzgibbon BM, Kennedy HA, Arnold SL, Elliot D, Peachey A, Zangen A, Fitzgerald PB. A double-blind, randomized trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder. Brain Stimul. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24280031 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.projectrex.org

Home page with information about the Primary Investigator

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00056546

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brief, High-dose rTMS for Depression
NCT04657432 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA