Food Insecurity, Obesity, and Impulsive Food Choice

NCT ID: NCT02930642

Last Updated: 2020-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-31

Study Completion Date

2020-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to determine the relations among food insecurity status, obesity, and impulsive food choice patterns and to test the extent to which a mindful eating strategy reduces impulsive choice for food. The central hypothesis is that food-insecure individuals will demonstrate more impulsive food choice patterns and demonstrate a greater likelihood of obesity than individuals who are food secure. Two specific aims are proposed:

Specific aim #1: Determine the relation between food insecurity, obesity, and impulsive food choice patterns in women. The working hypothesis is that food-insecure individuals, especially those that are obese, will exhibit more impulsive food choice patterns than food-secure individuals.

Specific aim #2: Determine the efficacy of an extended mindfulness-based eating strategy on impulsive choice patterns among food insecure women. The working hypothesis is that mindful eating will reduce impulsive food choice patterns relative to baseline and control conditions, and will persist to follow-up. The investigators expect mindful eating to reduce impulsive choice compared to control conditions, despite food security status.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will recruit women from a variety of community locations, including grocery stores, public schools, churches, local food pantries, and from governmental food assistance programs, such as Women, Infants, and Children and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Participants will be recruited heavily from settings where low to moderate food security is prevalent, but not severe food security. Food insecurity status will be determined by completion of the 18-item United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Security Module, and will be scored based on standardized scoring techniques. Participants will provide informed consent, be weighed and measured, and complete several questionnaires that measure diet quality, time since last pay check or food benefits as well as other information, such as age, education, ethnicity, employment status, income, marital status, intelligence, nicotine dependence, and alcohol and drug use. Participants will complete baseline delay and probability discounting tasks for food and money as measures of impulsivity.

Then, food insecure women only will be randomly assigned to one of three arms: mindful eating, a nutrition movie, or a control. Participants in the mindful eating group will be given four foods and receive a 50 min mindful eating workshop. Individuals in the nutrition movie condition also will be given the same four foods, but will view a 50 minute nutrition video. The third group (no treatment control) will receive the four foods, but no treatment. A Time 2 measures of discounting will be administered immediately after the treatments.

Then, for the next week after Session 2, participants in the mindful eating group will be asked to practice mindful eating throughout the week. Research assistants will send text message prompts to participants reminding them to record when they practice mindful eating during meals twice per day for one week. Those in the Nutrition movie will receive the same number of prompts during a one week period as the mindful eating group, but they will give give one-word answers to questions about nutrition. Those in the control group will do nothing during the week.

After one week of mindful eating (or controls), all participants will be asked to return to the laboratory and complete a third set of discounting tasks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Feeding Behavior Obesity Impulsivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mindful Eating

Participants in this arm will receive a 50 min mindful eating training with four pieces of food. They will practice mindful eating at home with two meals for a one-week duration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mindful Eating

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Mindful eating is a behavioral strategy in which food is eaten slowly, with deliberate and focused attention on the features of food, the process of eating, and physiological responses to eating. Objectivity is key.

Nutrition Digital Video Disc (DVD)

Participants will watch a 50 min DVD on nutrition and receive four pieces of food. They will receive prompts twice a week to give one-word answers to questions about food.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nutrition DVD

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants watch a 50 minute video on nutrition to control for verbal aspects of food.

Control

Participants will receive four pieces of food. They will not receive any prompts during the one week.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mindful Eating

Mindful eating is a behavioral strategy in which food is eaten slowly, with deliberate and focused attention on the features of food, the process of eating, and physiological responses to eating. Objectivity is key.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Nutrition DVD

Participants watch a 50 minute video on nutrition to control for verbal aspects of food.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Raisin exercise

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be female
* Must be an adult
* Must score 3-5 (with children) or 3-7 (without children) on the USDA Food Security Module
* Must be English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Diagnosed with an eating disorder
* HIV
* Hemophilia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Idaho State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erin Rasmussen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Idaho State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Idaho State University

Pocatello, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lawyer SR, Boomhower SR, Rasmussen EB. Differential associations between obesity and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26235925 (View on PubMed)

Rasmussen EB, Lawyer SR, Reilly W. Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behav Processes. 2010 Jan;83(1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19744547 (View on PubMed)

Hendrickson KL, Rasmussen EB. Effects of mindful eating training on delay and probability discounting for food and money in obese and healthy-weight individuals. Behav Res Ther. 2013 Jul;51(7):399-409. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23685325 (View on PubMed)

Hendrickson KL, Rasmussen EB, Lawyer SR. Measurement and validation of measures for impulsive food choice across obese and healthy-weight individuals. Appetite. 2015 Jul;90:254-63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25796210 (View on PubMed)

Robaina KA, Martin KS. Food insecurity, poor diet quality, and obesity among food pantry participants in Hartford, CT. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23219294 (View on PubMed)

Townsend MS, Peerson J, Love B, Achterberg C, Murphy SP. Food insecurity is positively related to overweight in women. J Nutr. 2001 Jun;131(6):1738-45. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.6.1738.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11385061 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IdahoSU001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Decision-making and Food Intake
NCT07133529 RECRUITING NA
Bringing Awareness Into Eating
NCT04021745 COMPLETED NA
Cortisol and Food Insecurity
NCT05191030 COMPLETED NA