Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on DCB vs. POBA in De-novo Femoropopliteal Disease

NCT ID: NCT02927574

Last Updated: 2020-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Restenosis is still an issue after endovascular revascularization for femoropopliteal occlusive disease. One approach to reduce the rates of restenosis and reintervention is local application of Paclitaxel with drug-coated balloon angioplasty. The purpose is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials comparing on Drug-Coated Balloon angioplasty (DCB) vs. Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) in de-novo femoropopliteal disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Peripheral arterial disease is the third leading entity of atherosclerosis. The femoropopliteal segment is affected in most patients. Endovascular revascularisation is one possible treatment option, but high rates of restenosis, especially in complex lesions, are a limiting factor. Bare-metal stents failed to show a long-term superiority in a Cochrane systematic review. Another approach to prevent restenosis is local delivery of an antiproliferative drug (e.g. Paclitaxel) via Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty. New studies did report their results since the publication of earlier meta-analyses. It's time for an up-to-date systematic review. Prior systematic reviews did not address risk of bias nor did they take differences in treatment strategy despite the used balloon catheter into consideration.Some previous reviews did compare results from different points in time, e.g. analysis of 6 months' results together with 24 months' results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Arterial Disease Intermittent Claudication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DCB

Treatment with Paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB)

DCB

Intervention Type DEVICE

POBA

Treatment with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)

POBA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DCB

Intervention Type DEVICE

POBA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Randomized controlled trials
* DCB vs. POBA
* focus on de-novo femoropopliteal lesions
* registration in a clinical trials registry
* available study protocol (either in clinical trial registry or published)

Exclusion Criteria

* non-randomized controlled trials
* focus on below-the-knee interventions
* focus on iliac artery interventions
* focus on treatment of critical limb ischemia
* focus on treatment of in-stent restenosis
* usage of additional devices except for bare-metal stent (e.g. atherectomy)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jena University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ulf Teichgräber

Prof. Dr. med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ulf Teichgräber, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Jena

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IDIR/005/2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drug Coated Balloons for Prevention of Restenosis
NCT00696956 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3