Comparison of Intraoperative Volume Replacement Determined by the Plethysmograph Variability Index (PVI) With That Determined by the Delta PP in the Digestive, Gynecological, Urological, and Abdominal Surgery and Their Impact on the Length of Stay
NCT ID: NCT02908256
Last Updated: 2018-01-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-04-30
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Different criteria are used to guide the optimal vascular filling of a patient. Among the various monitoring for the last twenty years are parameters originating from the respiratory variations of the arterial pressure curves and the pulse oximetry.
On arterial curves, the Systolic Pressure Variation (SPV) is the difference between the maximum systolic pressure (DeltaUp) and the minimal one (DeltaDown).On the oxygen saturometry curves obtained with the Masimo Radical7, the plethysmographic variability index (PVI) corresponds to the formula (PImax-PImin/PImax X 100%) where PI corresponds to the quotient expressed in % between the pulsed infrared absorption signal and the continuous absorption signal.
It has been demonstrated that the dynamic indexes were better than the static indexes to determine the response to the vascular filling. A meta-analysis showed that the dynamic changes of the variables derived from the arterial pressure curve of patients under mechanic ventilation could predict the vascular filling responsiveness with a high specificity and sensibility. The same thing applies to the variables derived from the pulsed oxymetry curves.
Furthermore, monitoring and minimizing, through the vascular filling, the variations of the pulsated arterial pressure (delta PP) induced by the mechanic ventilation during a high risk surgery allows to reduce the postoperative complications and the hospital length of stay. This has not yet been proved for the non invasive parameters (IP and PVI).
The goal of this study is thus to compare a non invasive strategy (based on PVI) to an invasive strategy (based on the deltaPP) of perioperatory filling during abdomino-pelvic interventions (digestive, gynecologic, urologic), in order to test their equivalence and measure their impact in terms of hospital stay.
This record is linked to the NCT02709252 record and share the same cohort of patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pleth Variability Index and Fluid Management During Surgery
NCT00816153
Paired Comparison of SVV and PVI Accuracy
NCT07260890
Fluid Management Based on Pleth Variability Index (PVI) Monitoring During High-risk Surgery
NCT01788293
Internal Jugular Vein Distensibility and Pleth Variability Index(PVI) for Evaluating Fluid Responsiveness
NCT03673475
Fluid Requirement During Surgery PVI v Doppler
NCT02142816
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PVI group
Monitoring of the PVI during the surgical intervention
Geloplasma (PVI)
In the PVI group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the PVI\>15% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the PVI remains over 15%.
Delta PP group
Monitoring of the deltaPP during the surgical intervention
Geloplasma (delta PP)
In the delta PP group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the delta PP\> 13% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the delta PP remains over 13%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Geloplasma (PVI)
In the PVI group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the PVI\>15% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the PVI remains over 15%.
Geloplasma (delta PP)
In the delta PP group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the delta PP\> 13% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the delta PP remains over 13%.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Surgery duration superior to 1 hour
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI \> 35
* supraventricular arrythmia (isolated extrasystoles excepted)
* cardiac insufficiency (F.E \< 25 %)
* severe peripheric vascular affections
* severe respiratory affections
* terminal renal insufficiency (creatine clear and \< 30 mL/min)
* gelatin allergies
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brugmann University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philippe VAN DER LINDEN
Head of clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe Van Der Linden, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Brugmann
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H. Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Mar;51(3):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01221.x.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):200-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen133. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):555-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1.
Michard F, Lopes MR, Auler JO Jr. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock. Crit Care. 2007;11(3):131. doi: 10.1186/cc5905.
Coeckelenbergh S, Delaporte A, Ghoundiwal D, Bidgoli J, Fils JF, Schmartz D, Van der Linden P. Pleth variability index versus pulse pressure variation for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 9;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0707-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUB-GIFA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.