Comparison of Intraoperative Volume Replacement Determined by the Plethysmograph Variability Index (PVI) With That Determined by the Delta PP in the Digestive, Gynecological, Urological, and Abdominal Surgery and Their Impact on the Length of Stay

NCT ID: NCT02908256

Last Updated: 2018-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An optimal intraoperative fluid replacement reduces the hospital stay, the admissions in the intensive care unit and the mortality rate after a major surgery.

Different criteria are used to guide the optimal vascular filling of a patient. Among the various monitoring for the last twenty years are parameters originating from the respiratory variations of the arterial pressure curves and the pulse oximetry.

On arterial curves, the Systolic Pressure Variation (SPV) is the difference between the maximum systolic pressure (DeltaUp) and the minimal one (DeltaDown).On the oxygen saturometry curves obtained with the Masimo Radical7, the plethysmographic variability index (PVI) corresponds to the formula (PImax-PImin/PImax X 100%) where PI corresponds to the quotient expressed in % between the pulsed infrared absorption signal and the continuous absorption signal.

It has been demonstrated that the dynamic indexes were better than the static indexes to determine the response to the vascular filling. A meta-analysis showed that the dynamic changes of the variables derived from the arterial pressure curve of patients under mechanic ventilation could predict the vascular filling responsiveness with a high specificity and sensibility. The same thing applies to the variables derived from the pulsed oxymetry curves.

Furthermore, monitoring and minimizing, through the vascular filling, the variations of the pulsated arterial pressure (delta PP) induced by the mechanic ventilation during a high risk surgery allows to reduce the postoperative complications and the hospital length of stay. This has not yet been proved for the non invasive parameters (IP and PVI).

The goal of this study is thus to compare a non invasive strategy (based on PVI) to an invasive strategy (based on the deltaPP) of perioperatory filling during abdomino-pelvic interventions (digestive, gynecologic, urologic), in order to test their equivalence and measure their impact in terms of hospital stay.

This record is linked to the NCT02709252 record and share the same cohort of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdomino-pelvic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PVI group

Monitoring of the PVI during the surgical intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Geloplasma (PVI)

Intervention Type DRUG

In the PVI group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the PVI\>15% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the PVI remains over 15%.

Delta PP group

Monitoring of the deltaPP during the surgical intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Geloplasma (delta PP)

Intervention Type DRUG

In the delta PP group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the delta PP\> 13% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the delta PP remains over 13%.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Geloplasma (PVI)

In the PVI group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the PVI\>15% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the PVI remains over 15%.

Intervention Type DRUG

Geloplasma (delta PP)

In the delta PP group, a filling solution (geloplasma) will be given as a bolus of 250 ml administered in 10 minutes if the delta PP\> 13% during more than 5 minutes. The bolus will be repeated if the delta PP remains over 13%.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Abdominal-pelvic surgery (digestive, gynecologic, urologic) with laparotomy or laparoscopy
* Surgery duration superior to 1 hour

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA score of 4
* BMI \> 35
* supraventricular arrythmia (isolated extrasystoles excepted)
* cardiac insufficiency (F.E \< 25 %)
* severe peripheric vascular affections
* severe respiratory affections
* terminal renal insufficiency (creatine clear and \< 30 mL/min)
* gelatin allergies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brugmann University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Philippe VAN DER LINDEN

Head of clinic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Philippe Van Der Linden, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brugmann

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Holte K, Secher NH, Kehlet H. Monitoring of peri-operative fluid administration by individualized goal-directed therapy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Mar;51(3):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01221.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17390421 (View on PubMed)

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19602972 (View on PubMed)

Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):200-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen133. Epub 2008 Jun 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18522935 (View on PubMed)

Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jun;27(6):555-61. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20035228 (View on PubMed)

Michard F, Lopes MR, Auler JO Jr. Pulse pressure variation: beyond the fluid management of patients with shock. Crit Care. 2007;11(3):131. doi: 10.1186/cc5905.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17521454 (View on PubMed)

Coeckelenbergh S, Delaporte A, Ghoundiwal D, Bidgoli J, Fils JF, Schmartz D, Van der Linden P. Pleth variability index versus pulse pressure variation for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 9;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0707-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30851740 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHUB-GIFA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.