Segmental Epidural Anesthesia (SEA) V/S General Anesthesia for PCNL

NCT ID: NCT02878512

Last Updated: 2016-08-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Management of nephrolithiasis has been revolutionized by the advent of shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique and is used for the fragmentation and removal of stones of size more than 20 to 30 mm, staghorn stones or multiple stones resistant to ESWL. Anaesthesia for PCNL is a challenge because of the disease, surgical procedure, positioning, hypothermia,and the possibility of fluid absorption, dilutional anaemia and blood loss. General anaesthesia is the gold standard for this surgery.The advent of new drugs has refined the technique of general anaesthesia. However there are several issues related to prone position still to be addressed like accidental extubation and difficult reintubation, nerve injuries and post operative respiratory complications.

Combined spinal epidural(CSE) and only epidural anaesthesia (EA) is a well established technique of anaesthesia for upper abdomen and lower thoracic surgeries. It use has also been reported in PCNL surgeries.Segmental epidural can selectively blocks pain fibres from the surgical site. This not only allows to limit the dose of the local anaesthetics, but also limit motor and sympathetic blockade. Selective sympathetic block is associated with respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal and metabolic benefits. This formed the basis of our current study. In the present study the investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy of segmental epidural for PCNL and compared it with standard technique i.e. GA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To evaluate efficacy the investigators compared intraoperative haemodynamics, surgical clearance of stones, post operative pain, surgeon's and Patient's satisfaction scores and postoperative complications and side effects in 60 ASA I and II patients undergoing PCNL surgery who received either General anesthesia or Segmental epidural Anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Success Rate Under Segmental Epidural Post Operative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PCNL under General Anesthesia

Patients were premedicated with Inj. Atropine 0.06 mg intramuscularly half an hour prior to surgery, IV ranitidine 1mg kg-1, IV ondansetron 0.08mg kg-1 IV midazolam 0.02mg kg-1 and Pentazocine 0.3 mg/kg. Anaesthesia was induced with IV Thiopentone sodium 3-5 mg kg-1 and Vecuronium 0.1mg kg-1.and then intubated. Anaesthesia was maintained on 50 %:50% nitrous oxide and oxygen, vecuronium and propofol infusion . At the end of the surgery postoperative analgesia was given with IV tarmadol and local nfiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine at the surgical site. Patients were reversed with IV glycopyrrolate 0.008mg kg-1 and IV neostigmine 0.06mg kg-1 and extubated.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PCNL under General Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients undergoing percutaneous Nephrolithotomy received General anesthesia.

PCNL under Segmental epidural Anesthesia

epidural space was located at T12 -L1 or L1-L2 space .The epidural catheter was inserted cephalad 5 cm upwards in the epidural space (tip approximately at T8 to T9). and test dose of 3 ml of 2% Adrenalized Lignocaine was administered..loading dose of 0.5% Bupivacaine, approximately 8 to 10 ml was injected epidurally with regular negative aspiration to block T6- T12 segments, if desired level was not achieved then additional dose of 1 to 1.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine per spared segment was given to achieve the desired level.Motor blockade of the lower limbs was checked and noted before lithotomy, before prone and at the end of the surgery using Bromage scale. After two segment regression of sensory level epidural top up with 1/4th of initial dose 2 to 3 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine was given. At the end of the surgery 8ml of 0.125% Bupivacaine was administered for postoperative analgesia and the catheter was removed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Segmental Epidural Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients undergoing PCNL surgery received Segmental epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PCNL under General Anesthesia

Patients undergoing percutaneous Nephrolithotomy received General anesthesia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Segmental Epidural Anesthesia

Patients undergoing PCNL surgery received Segmental epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Regional Anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I/II
* Age - 18 years to 60 years
* Either sex
* BMI \< 30

Exclusion Criteria

* Unwilling for consent
* ASA 3
* Obesity with BMI \> 30.
* Contraindications for Epidural Anaesthesia
* Undilated pelvicalyceal system
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shakuntala Basantwani

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEC/69/16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4