Epidural Injection of Corticosteroids Under USG (EICUS)

NCT ID: NCT02860078

Last Updated: 2021-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-17

Study Completion Date

2021-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Qualitative and quantitatively evaluate the pain control and incidence of adverse effects in patients undergoing corticosteroid infiltration and local anesthetic through sacral epidural puncture with ultrasound assistance or isolated use of fluoroscopy to aid puncture and location of the sacral epidural space. A group will be submitted to epidural corticosteroid infiltration associated with local anesthetic with the use of fluoroscopy for locating the sacral epidural space, which is currently the gold standard for this technique, while in another location group will be held with the use of ultrasound.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Procedures guided by ultrasound (USG) have advantages over traditional techniques (fluoroscopy) with respect to regional anesthesia. Some studies have shown its usefulness as a quick, safe and simple tool for the location of the sacral hiatus and to guide the puncture of the sacral epidural space in patients with chronic low back pain, despite the lack of data with respect to clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the pain control and incidence of adverse effects in patients undergoing corticosteroid infiltration and local anesthetic through sacral epidural puncture with ultrasound assistance or isolated use of fluoroscopy to aid puncture and location of the sacral epidural space. It will also be evaluated success rate in the first puncture, and the time duration of the procedure in groups.

METHODS: It is clinical, analytical, prospective trial, randomized, covered for evaluators. It will include 30 patients with chronic low back pain or pain in the lower limbs resulting in lumbar canal stenosis, refractory to medical treatment. A group will be submitted to epidural corticosteroid infiltration associated with local anesthetic with the use of fluoroscopy for locating the sacral epidural space, which is currently the gold standard for this technique, while in another location group will be held with the use of ultrasound.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound

The group I will be subjected to epidural infiltration using methylprednisolone acetate diluted in ropivacaine 0.1%. Initially the sacral hiatus is identified by palpation. After, the ultrasound device is used (USG) for the puncture, with a linear transducer of high frequency. At the end of corticosteroid administration, the placement of the needle tip will be checked with fluoroscopy and noted.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Location and function of sacral epidural space with ultrasound

Radioscopy

The group II will be subjected to infiltration using methylprednisolone acetate diluted in ropivacaine 0.1% . However, only radioscopy be used to guide the puncture.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radioscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Location and puncture of the sacral epidural space only with fluoroscopy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

Location and function of sacral epidural space with ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Radioscopy

Location and puncture of the sacral epidural space only with fluoroscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Older than 18 years old;
* Patients who have low back and/or lower extremities due to lumbar spinal stenosis pain outpatients, with regular follow-up refractory to conservative medical treatment (Verbal Scale of Pain \> 3, more three months duration, with no improvement with clinical treatment).

Exclusion Criteria

* Symptoms that characterize a surgical emergency;
* The presence of sensory or motor deficit (chronic mild motor impairment or mild paresthesia will not be deleted), injury to peripheral nerves, trauma history or recent fracture;
* Serious medical conditions or decompensated;
* Infection at the puncture site;
* Coagulopathy;
* Contrast allergy history or the medications used in the technique;
* Pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

SHIRLEY ANDRADE SANTOS

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shirley Andrade Santos

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Liu HP, Chen MJ, Date E, Lew HL. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15220789 (View on PubMed)

Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Koinig H, Kapral S, Weinstabl C, Mayer N. Ultrasonographic guidance improves sensory block and onset time of three-in-one blocks. Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):854-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00026.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9322469 (View on PubMed)

Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Wallner T, Koinig H, Mayer N, Kapral S. Ultrasonographic guidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):584-8. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90086-4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 9840855 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Knezevic NN, Boswell MV, Kaye AD, Hirsch JA. Epidural Injections for Lumbar Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):E365-410.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27008296 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V, Damron KS, Boswell MV. Effect of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid or local anesthetic injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and radiculitis: a randomized, controlled, double blind trial with a two-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):273-86.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22828681 (View on PubMed)

Blanchais A, Le Goff B, Guillot P, Berthelot JM, Glemarec J, Maugars Y. Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural glucocorticoid injections. Joint Bone Spine. 2010 Oct;77(5):440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 Sep 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20869897 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

56795916.8.0000.0068

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.