Does Ultrasound Scanning of the Lumbar Spine Improve Patient Satisfaction and the Ease of Insertion Epidurals?
NCT ID: NCT00996905
Last Updated: 2011-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study hypothesis is that anesthesiologists (both residents and fellows), will have an increased rate of success and ease of insertion of labour epidural catheters, and that there will be increased patient satisfaction, if ultrasound scanning of the lumbar spine is done prior to the procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasonography for Confirmation of Caudal Injection
NCT02321787
Does Ultrasound Guidance Improve Time to Perform a Spinal or Number of Attempts in Obese Patients?
NCT01680913
Comparison of Safety And Efficacy of Neuraxial Anesthesia, Palpation Versus Ultrasound
NCT01322126
Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Poorly-palpable Surface Landmarks
NCT03377764
Real-time Ultrasound-guided Spinal Anesthesia:A Feasibility Study
NCT01326988
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will involve residents and fellows, each performing epidural insertions with and without the use of ultrasound scanning of the lumbar spine prior to the procedure. If the hypothesis is correct, then the use of this technique may become widespread, resulting in less complications and increased patients satisfaction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Beginner Conventional (BC)
Beginner level (residents) doing epidural insertions the conventional way (ie. no ultrasound scanning)
No interventions assigned to this group
Beginner Ultrasound (BU)
Beginner level (residents) doing epidural insertions with the help of ultrasound scanning.
Portable ultrasound machine
Each patient will have their lumbar spine scanned by ultrasound for a maximum period of 5 minutes.
Experienced Conventional
Experienced level (fellows) doing epidural insertions the conventional way.
No interventions assigned to this group
Experienced Ultrasound
Experienced level (fellows) doing epidural insertions with the help of ultrasound scanning.
Portable ultrasound machine
Each patient will have their lumbar spine scanned by ultrasound for a maximum period of 5 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Portable ultrasound machine
Each patient will have their lumbar spine scanned by ultrasound for a maximum period of 5 minutes.
Portable ultrasound machine
Each patient will have their lumbar spine scanned by ultrasound for a maximum period of 5 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* requesting epidural analgesia for labour
* having easily palpable spine (clinically 'easy' back)
* Residents and fellows training or practicing at Mount Sinai hospital and enrolled in either a residency or fellowship program at the University of Toronto.
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with a history of difficult epidural insertions or spinal anesthetic
* Patients with a known history of back surgery
* patients with known significant kyph0scoliosis
For Anesthesiologists:
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose CA Carvalho, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arzola C, Mikhael R, Margarido C, Carvalho JC. Spinal ultrasound versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in labour: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):499-505. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000119.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.