Comparison Between Two Ultrasound Technologies for Ultrasound-guided Catheter Placement in Regional Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT01122693
Last Updated: 2016-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-01-31
2011-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the past, electrical stimulation which relied on surface landmark identification, was used for this. However, landmark techniques have limitations; variations in anatomy and nerve physiology , as well as equipment accuracy have had an effect on success rates and complications.
However, alongside the enthusiasm of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia, there should be a degree of informed scepticism. The widespread use of the various techniques of ultrasound-guided regional blocks without adequate training raises the danger of malpractice and subsequent impaired outcome.
Adequate education in the use of regional block techniques under ultrasound guidance is essential. Recent technical developments have achieved higher ultrasound frequencies and better image resolution, as well as better post-processing and user-friendliness.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether new technical features such as reference images, higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution and smaller size and weight of the ultrasound probes may improve outcome (clinical benefits) and may show an increased efficacy and safety. And if the new technology of ultrasound images improves the training quality of trainees and novices in the art of ultrasound-guided blocks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia
NCT03383770
Evaluation of ChatGPT-4's Success Sonoanatomy
NCT06642389
Comparison of Safety And Efficacy of Neuraxial Anesthesia, Palpation Versus Ultrasound
NCT01322126
Comparison of Echo-assisted ALR Technique and Traditional ALR Technique for the Placement of an Epidural Catheter in the Obstetric Patient
NCT06811649
Ultrasound for Neuraxial Anesthesia
NCT02553746
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
standard 2D ultrasound images
eZono - high-quality 2D ultrasound images
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
standard 2D ultrasound images
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images
high-quality 2D ultrasound images
eZono - high-quality 2D ultrasound images
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
standard 2D ultrasound images
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images
nerve stimulation techniques
eZono - high-quality 2D ultrasound images
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
standard 2D ultrasound images
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
eZono - high-quality 2D ultrasound images
higher ultrasound frequencies, better image resolution, better post-processing and user-friendliness.
standard 2D ultrasound images
current standard in two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Lacking willingness to save and hand out data within the study
* Accommodation in an institution due to an official or judicial order
* (Unclear) history of alcohol or substances disabuse
* Absent knowledge of German language
* Analphabetism
* Allergy to local anesthesia or other ingredients of the intravenous solutions
* For women: Pregnancy or positive pregnancy test within the preoperative screening
* Operation due to case of emergency, polytrauma or pathologic fracture
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification greater than III
* Peripheral or central edema
* AIDS (according to the CDC-classification of HIV-infection: category C)
* Immunosuppression therapy
* History of bleeding tendency (e.g. von-Willebrand-disease, thrombocytopenia)
* Derailed metabolic disorder (e.g. Diabetes mellitus (Glucose \> 300 mg/dl) during the preoperative screening)
* Known history of electrolyte disturbance (e.g. Hyperkalemia \> 5.8 mmol/l, Hypernatraemia \> 155 mmol/l)
* Known history of acid-base-dysbalances
* History of intracranial hemorrhage within one year of participation in the study
* Neurological or psychiatric disease with limited contractual capability
* CHF (congestive heart failure) according to (New York Heart Association) classification - NYHA class IV
* Liver disease (CHILD B or C cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease (MELD-score greater than 10)
* Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl or greater than 150 µmol/l or dependency of haemodialysis)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Claudia Spies
Univ. Prof. Dr. med. Claudia Spies, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte / Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claudia Spies, MD Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte / Campus Virchow-Klinikum
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
eZono
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.