The Effect of USG-Guided Coccygeal Nerve Block on Sacrococcygeal And/or Intercoccygeal Joint Injection for Coccydynia
NCT ID: NCT05683262
Last Updated: 2024-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-15
2024-06-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Frequency of Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment Diagnosed With Ultrasound Guided Nerve Block
NCT05303597
Efficacy of Cervical Epidural Injection and Selective Nerve Root Block
NCT05340179
Selective Cervical Root Block for Chronic Pain
NCT05450926
Fluoroscopic vs Ultrasound Guided Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Injection
NCT05235295
Fluoroscopy Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Sacral Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT05520463
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, it is planned to assessed the change of pain severity of the patients who had sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection with/without coccygeal nerve block in our clinic due to the complaint of coccydynia resistant to conservative treatment methods, by applying the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Patients are asked to indicate rates of their pain on the day of presentation during palpation of coccyx, at the first sitting, sitting on soft and hard surface, standing up from sitting position, standing for long time, during defecation, sexual intercourse and menstrual cycle, and also 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 moths and 6 months after the injection for each. Participants are asked to indicate rates of their pain according to NRS during sitting, standing up from sitting position and on palpation of coccyx at the first hour of injection. The pain elicited by injection is also asked after one hour, to determine the effect of coccygeal nerve block which is applied before the sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection. The second outcome measurement method is assessing the change of pain-free sitting time as a minute before the injection, and one hour, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 moths and 6 months after the injection.The Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain, Short Form-12 (SF-12) are applied to the participants before the procedure and, at the 1st month, 3rd months and 6 months after the treatment. In these ways, it is planned to evaluate the efficacy of sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection and also to understand does any additive effect of coccygeal nerve blockade to this treatment approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection is applied to patients in this group
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection
Ultrasound guidance is used for correct visualization of injection site, and so obtained more successful results. Patients are placed in the prone position with a pillow under the abdomen to flatten the lumbar curvature. Lower extremities should be internally rotated while feet are inverted to help flatten the gluteal region. Injection site is cleaned thrice with povidone iodine %10 solution and covered with sterile drapes. Ultrasonography gel was applied on the probe and the probe was wrapped with a transparent thin sheath and cleaned with povidone iodine. Sterile gel is applied on the skin. The sacrococcygeal ligament, the sacrococcygeal and intercoccygeal joints were visualized. The sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joints were entered using the in-plane technique with a 23 gauge 6 cm long needle. When it was seen that the needle tip was inside the joint, 3 cc of 2% lidocaine + 1 cc betamethasone solution was injected.
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection with coccygeal nerve block
Ultrasound-guided coccygeal nerve blockade is done before the application of ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection to patients in this group
Ultrasound-guided coccygeal nerve block
Patients are placed in the prone position with a pillow under the abdomen. Lower extremities are internally rotated while feet are inverted. Injection site and the probe are cleaned thrice with povidone iodine %10 solution. Sterile gel is applied. The prob was placed on coccygeal cornu and the coccygeal nerve was visualized superomedial to the CC in the subcutaneous tissue layer. Hydrodissection was made by administering 5 ml of 5% dextrose + 1 ml of 2% lidocaine via an in-plane approach with a 23 gauge 6 cm long needle, targeting the short axes of the bilateral coccygeal nerves.
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection after coccygeal nerve block
After the coccygeal nerve block, when the pain with palpation of the coccygeal region was reduced by at least 50%, the sacrococcygeal ligament, sacrococcygeal and intercoccygeal joints were visualized.The sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joints were entered using the in-plane technique with a 23 gauge 6 cm long needle. When the needle tip was inside the joint, 3 cc of 2% lidocaine + 1 cc betamethasone solution was injected.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection
Ultrasound guidance is used for correct visualization of injection site, and so obtained more successful results. Patients are placed in the prone position with a pillow under the abdomen to flatten the lumbar curvature. Lower extremities should be internally rotated while feet are inverted to help flatten the gluteal region. Injection site is cleaned thrice with povidone iodine %10 solution and covered with sterile drapes. Ultrasonography gel was applied on the probe and the probe was wrapped with a transparent thin sheath and cleaned with povidone iodine. Sterile gel is applied on the skin. The sacrococcygeal ligament, the sacrococcygeal and intercoccygeal joints were visualized. The sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joints were entered using the in-plane technique with a 23 gauge 6 cm long needle. When it was seen that the needle tip was inside the joint, 3 cc of 2% lidocaine + 1 cc betamethasone solution was injected.
Ultrasound-guided coccygeal nerve block
Patients are placed in the prone position with a pillow under the abdomen. Lower extremities are internally rotated while feet are inverted. Injection site and the probe are cleaned thrice with povidone iodine %10 solution. Sterile gel is applied. The prob was placed on coccygeal cornu and the coccygeal nerve was visualized superomedial to the CC in the subcutaneous tissue layer. Hydrodissection was made by administering 5 ml of 5% dextrose + 1 ml of 2% lidocaine via an in-plane approach with a 23 gauge 6 cm long needle, targeting the short axes of the bilateral coccygeal nerves.
Ultrasound-guided sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joint injection after coccygeal nerve block
After the coccygeal nerve block, when the pain with palpation of the coccygeal region was reduced by at least 50%, the sacrococcygeal ligament, sacrococcygeal and intercoccygeal joints were visualized.The sacrococcygeal and/or intercoccygeal joints were entered using the in-plane technique with a 23 gauge 6 cm long needle. When the needle tip was inside the joint, 3 cc of 2% lidocaine + 1 cc betamethasone solution was injected.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have coccygeal pain and have not benefited from conservative treatment
3. Be able to understand enough Turkish to complete the outcome questionnaire
4. Patients whose informed consent was obtained for participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of surgery for coccydynia
3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
4. Inflammatory disease which effect the spine
5. Malignancy
6. Coagulation disorders
7. Infection
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aslinur Keles Ercisli, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Feyza Unlu Ozkan
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Farih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sencan S, Edipoglu IS, Ulku Demir FG, Yolcu G, Gunduz OH. Are steroids required in the treatment of ganglion impar blockade in chronic coccydynia? a prospective double-blinded clinical trial. Korean J Pain. 2019 Oct 1;32(4):301-306. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.301.
Garg B, Ahuja K. Coccydynia-A comprehensive review on etiology, radiological features and management options. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan;12(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Mitra R, Cheung L, Perry P. Efficacy of fluoroscopically guided steroid injections in the management of coccydynia. Pain Physician. 2007 Nov;10(6):775-8.
Datir A, Connell D. CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to the management of coccydynia. Clin Radiol. 2010 Jan;65(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
Woon JT, Stringer MD. Clinical anatomy of the coccyx: A systematic review. Clin Anat. 2012 Mar;25(2):158-67. doi: 10.1002/ca.21216. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
Chen Y, Huang-Lionnet JHY, Cohen SP. Radiofrequency Ablation in Coccydynia: A Case Series and Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review. Pain Med. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1111-1130. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw268.
Wu WT, Hsu YC, Chang KV, Ozcakar L. Ultrasound Imaging and Ultrasound-Guided Injection of the Coccygeal Nerve for Coccydynia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 1;101(7):e108-e109. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001987. Epub 2022 Feb 23. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-83041234-604.16.01-8011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.