Comparative Study of the Analgesic Effect of Spinal Anesthesia or Infiltration Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT ID: NCT02839538
Last Updated: 2016-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-12-31
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: This randomized study included 40 patients aged 18 to 60 years old. Local group (LG) received local infiltration under general anaesthesia; spinal group (SG) received a subarachnoid block. LG received general anaesthesia with propofol, atracurium and propofol infusion as well as a local infiltration of 20 ml 0.75% ropivacaine. SG received 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Analgesic supplementation was with 50µg of fentanyl for LG and 1% lidocaine for SG. There were assessed: postoperative pain intensity, sphincter relaxation, motor blockade of lower limbs, time to discharge, analgesic dose over 1 week and adverse effects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fracture
NCT04285333
Postoperative Analgesia Using Ganglion Impar Block After Anal Surgery
NCT04110132
Femoral/Sciatic Block for Knee Surgery
NCT02882152
Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain After Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT05889962
Femoral Nerve Block vs Peri-capsular Nerve Group Block for Hip Fracture Analgesia
NCT05444803
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients in group 1( n= 19 ) will be submitted to spinal block and group 2 (n=21) to local infiltration. The spinal block will be performed with 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine. The infiltration will be performed with 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine on each side.
Will be evaluated: intensity of pain on a numerical scale from 0 to 10 every 30 minutes, relaxation of the sphincter muscles, intensity of pain after the operation every 30 minutes until reached the criteria for discharge, motor blocked of the lower limbs every 30 minutes, BP, HR, SO2, FR, other items that determine the conditions of discharge (urine output, nausea and vomiting), time to hospital discharge, and duration of analgesia.
Adverse effects and complications will be noted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
local Infiltration
Induction of General Anesthesia with Propofol(2mg/Kg) and Atracurium(0,5mg/Kg) . Pulmonary ventilation with laryngeal mask and Propofol infusion ( 100mcg/Kg/min.) After , Infiltration of 0.75% ropivacaine (10 ml) each side block injection of local anesthetic at perianal.
If necessary, fentanyl endovenous injection (50 mcg).
Local Infiltration
Injection at perianal region with ropivacaine 0.75%(20ml)
Subarachnoidal block
Sedation with midazolam 2 mg. After , Spinal block with 10 mg of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Injection of anesthetic at subarachnoidal space with Quincke needle 27G.
If pain, local infiltration with lidocaine 1% (5 ml) in wound.
Subarachnoidal block
Injection at subarachnoidal space with bupivacaine 0.5% ( 2ml)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Local Infiltration
Injection at perianal region with ropivacaine 0.75%(20ml)
Subarachnoidal block
Injection at subarachnoidal space with bupivacaine 0.5% ( 2ml)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of São Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luis Antonio Borges
MD
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Borges LA, da Cunha Leal P, Rey Moura EC, Sakata RK. Randomized clinical study on the analgesic effect of local infiltration versus spinal block for hemorrhoidectomy. Sao Paulo Med J. 2017 May-Jun;135(3):247-252. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0001260117. Epub 2017 May 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAAE: 37140514.9.000.5505
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.