Comparison Between 2l vs 3l in HFNC During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants

NCT ID: NCT02824744

Last Updated: 2024-05-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-02

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of 2 different flow with High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants.

Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center.

Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS \>3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups:HFNC "2l/min/kg" or HFNC "3l/min/kg" during 24 hours.

Conditions of measurements:

Primary endpoint: Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours.

Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

Secondary outcomes: Assessment at H1, H12, H24 of mWCAS, respiratory and heart rate, EDIN score, skin lesions, FiO2 required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%, transcutaneous PCO2 (correlated to an initial gas analysis), Report SpO2 / FiO2

Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis.

Expected number of patients: 135 per arm: 270 children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchiolitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

treatment by 2l/min/kg in HFNC

treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC) during the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants (0-6 months years old)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

treatment by 3l/min/kg in HFNC

treatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC) during the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants (0-6 months years old)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

treatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

treatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \< 6 months
* bronchiolitis
* mWCAS \> or =3
* hospitalisation: PICU
* signed consent form by parents

Exclusion Criteria

* Intubated patient
* Neurological or cardiac disease
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Hours

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University hospital of Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Milesi C, Pierre AF, Deho A, Pouyau R, Liet JM, Guillot C, Guilbert AS, Rambaud J, Millet A, Afanetti M, Guichoux J, Genuini M, Mansir T, Bergounioux J, Michel F, Marcoux MO, Baleine J, Durand S, Durand P, Dauger S, Javouhey E, Leteurtre S, Brissaud O, Renolleau S, Portefaix A, Douillard A, Cambonie G; GFRUP Respiratory Study Group. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a 3-L/kg/min versus 2-L/kg/min high-flow nasal cannula flow rate in young infants with severe viral bronchiolitis (TRAMONTANE 2). Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1870-1878. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5343-1. Epub 2018 Oct 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30343318 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9719

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Using HFNC in Bronchiolitis
NCT03342781 COMPLETED NA
High Flow Nasal Cannula Rates in Pediatric Asthma
NCT06379607 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA